Abstract
The study of the interactions between the natural sciences and economics has become a lively field of inquiry (Cohen 1993). Historically, physics has constituted the principal model for a vast majority of orthodox theorists (both classical and neoclassical) pursuing scientific inquiry in economics. Research on the origin and nature of common methodological tools of analysis between economics and physics has been extensively carried out by Mirowski (1989) and others (Drakopoulos 1994; Zouboulakis 1993). The conclusion has been that, while showing significant differences in the object of inquiry, economists have strongly sought to emulate methodological developments in the physical sciences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allais, M. 1947: Économie et intérêt. Paris: Librairie des publications officielles.
Chick, V. 1987: Silvio Gesell. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, editors, The New Palgrave: Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 2, London: Macmillan Press, 520.
Cohen, I.B. 1993: Analogy, homology, and metaphor in the interactions between the natural sciences and the social sciences, especially economics. In N. de Marchi, editor, Non-Natural Social Sciences: Reflecting on the Enterprise of ‘More Heat than Light,’ Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 7–44
Daly, H.E. 1980: The economic thought of Frederick Soddy. History of Political Economy 12, 469–88.
Darity, Jr., W. 1995: Keynes’s political philosophy: the Gesell connection. Eastern Economic Journal 21, 27–41.
Dillard, D. 1942: Silvio Gesell’s monetary theory of social reform. American Economic Review 32, 348–52.
Dragan, J.C., and M.C. Demetrescu 1986: Entropy and Bioeconomics. Milano: Editrice Nagard.
Drakopoulos, S.A. 1994: Economic method and the scientific philosophy of contemporary physics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 5, 37–53.
Fisher, I. 1933: Stamp Scrip. (assisted by H.R.L. Cohrssen, and H.W. Fisher) New York: Adelphi Co.
Gaitskell, H.T.N. 1933: Four monetary heretics. In G.D.H. Cole, editor, What Everybody Wants to Know about Money, London: Victor Gollanz, 346–413.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971: The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1976: Energy and Economic Myths, Institutional and Analytical Economic Essays. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.
Gesell, S. 1929: The Natural Economic Order. Frahnau: NeoVerlag.
Hsieh, C.-Y., and M.-H. Ye 1991: Economics, Philosophy, and Physics. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
Jevons, W.S. 1871: The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.
Jevons, W.S. 1875: Money and the Mechanism of Exchange. London: D. Appleton and Company.
Johannsen, N. 1908: A Neglected Point in Connection with Crises. New York: The Bankers Publishing Co.
Johannsen, N. 1913: Die Steuer der Zukunft und ihre Einwirkung auf geschäftliche Depressionen und volkswirtschaftliche Verhältnisse. Berlin: Puttkammer & Mühlbrecht.
Keynes, J.M. 1936: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
Keynes, J.M. 1937: The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 51, 209–23.
Knapp, G.F. 1924: The State Theory of Money. London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.
Lavoie, M. 1992: Foundations of Post Keynesian Economic Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Lavoie, M., and M. Seccareccia 1988: Money, interest and rentiers: the twilight of rentier capitalism in Keynes’s General Theory. In O.F. Hamouda and J.N. Smithin, editors, Keynes and Public Policy after Fifty Years, Vol. 2, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 145–58.
Mirowski, P. 1988: Against Mechanism: Protecting Economics from Science. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mirowski, P. 1989: More Heat than Light, Economics as Social Physics: Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, B.J. 1988: Horizontalists and Verticalists, the Macroeconomics of Credit Money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, C. 1989: Money, Interest and Capital, a Study in the Foundations of Monetary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seccareccia, M. 1988: Système monétaire et loi d’entropie: la notion gesellienne de préférence pour la liquidité. Économies et sociétés 22, 57–71.
Seccareccia, M. 1993: On the Intellectual Origins of Keynes’s Policy Radicalism in the General Theory. History of Economic Ideas 1, 77–104.
Soddy, F. 1922: Cartesian Economics. London: Henderson.
Seccareccia, M. 1924: The Inversion of Science and a Scheme of Scientific Reformation. London: Henderson.
Seccareccia, M. 1926: Wealth, Virtual Wealth and Debt: the Solution of the Economic Paradox. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co.
Seccareccia, M. 1931: Money Versus Man. London: Elkin Mathews & Marrot.
Seccareccia, M. 1934: The Rôle of Money: What it Should be, Contrasted with What it has Become. London: Routledge & Sons.
Suhr, D. 1989: The Capitalistic Cost-Benefit Structure of Money, an Analysis of Money’s Structural Nonneutrality and its Effects on the Economy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Trenn, T.J. 1979: The central role of energy in Soddy’s holistic and critical approach to nuclear science, economics, and social responsibility. British Journal for the History of Science 12, 261–76.
Zouboulakis, M. 1993: La science économique à la recherche de ses fondements: la tradition épistémologique ricardienne, 1826–1891. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seccareccia, M. (1997). Early Twentieth-Century Heterodox Monetary Thought. In: Cohen, A.J., Hagemann, H., Smithin, J. (eds) Money, Financial Institutions and Macroeconomics. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5362-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5362-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6254-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5362-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive