Skip to main content

Managing Risk Through Government Benefit Programs

  • Chapter
Managing Environmental Risk Through Insurance

Part of the book series: Studies in Risk and Uncertainty ((SIRU,volume 9))

  • 115 Accesses

Abstract

Federal, state, and local government, through the establishment of numerous benefit (some would say entitlement) programs, has stepped forward to accept some risks on behalf of its citizens. Taxes are the primary source of revenues to compensate those in need. In some cases, notably Social Security, revenues are at least partially provided by those who directly benefit from the program—the employees—supplemented by contributions from employers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For example, following Hurricane Agnes in 1972 the federal government, through the Small Business Administration, provided grants of up to $5,000 to cover the first layer of losses and 1 percent 30-year loans to cover the remaining portion of the damage. See Kunreuther, Howard, Recovery from Natural Disasters: Insurance or Federal Aid, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D. C, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. These programs may be costly to taxpayers if large numbers of loans are granted at below-market interest rates. Although such programs are more stringent than they were 20 years ago, the Small Business Administration still provides subsidized low-interest loans for individuals and businesses, with terms of up to 30 years. The interest rate may not exceed 4 or 8 percent, depending on whether the recipient has credit available elsewhere. See U. S. Congress, Federal Disaster Assistance Report of the Senate Task Force on Funding Disaster Relief, Washington, D. C, USGPO, 1995, p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kunreuther, Howard, “Mitigating Disaster Losses Through Insurance,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Priest, George, “The Government, the Market and the Problem of Catastrophic Loss,” The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.

    Google Scholar 

  5. New Zealand illustrates a case where a country treated disasters as the responsibility of all property owners in the country without regard to their hazard exposure. Until recently, funds to cover losses from disasters were obtained by a compulsory levy of 5 cents per $ 100 of property insured on all insurance contracts with fire content in them and were administered by the government’s Earthquake and War Damage Commission. The philosophy behind the Fund was that natural events were unforeseen and that where they were widespread and extraordinary, citizens ought to be helped by recourse to a central fund. The country has changed its philosophy and now places much greater responsibility for loss-sharing onto the private reinsurance industry and affected communities and individuals. See Hay, Iain, “Shaken Not Stirred: Repercussions of New Zealand’s Earthquake Commission Act 1993,” New Zealand Geographer, 50(2), p. 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Bernstein, Merton C, and Joan Brodshaug Bernstein, Social Security: The System That Works, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1988, p. 13., and in particular, reference number 3 which cites a United States Senate report.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, James and Howard Kunreuther, “Retroactive Liability and Future Risk: The Optimal Regulation of Underground Storage Tanks,” Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center Working Paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 42 U. S. C. sections 9601-9675

    Google Scholar 

  9. Probst, Katherine and Paul Portney, Assigning Liability for Superfund Cleanups: An Analysis of Options, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freeman, P.K., Kunreuther, H. (1997). Managing Risk Through Government Benefit Programs. In: Managing Environmental Risk Through Insurance. Studies in Risk and Uncertainty, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5360-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5360-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6253-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5360-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics