Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward Increased Centralization in Public School Finance

  • Chapter
Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 56))

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, public elementary and secondary education has been highly decentralized in the United States. There are more than 16,000 school districts, each of which has significant responsibility for raising education funds and deciding how those funds are to be spent; as late as the 1920s, local governments provided well over 80 percent of public school revenues. Although state governments have shared in the cost of providing education, historically their major role has been to monitor curriculum, evaluation and standards. Moreover, the federal role has been small. Federal spending is low and even a modest effort to involve the federal government in standards through Goals 2000 met an early demise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Betts, Julian R. “Does School Quality Matter? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77, no. 2 (May, 1995): 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, David and Alan B. Krueger. “Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United States.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (February, 1992): 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Catherine. “Regional School Taxing Units: The Texas Experiment.” Journal of Education Finance 21 (Summer, 1995): 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S., et al. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, John E., William M. Clune, and Stephen D. Sugarman. Private Wealth and Public Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, Paul N., Edward M. Gramlich, and Susan Loeb. “Michigan’s Recent School Finance Reforms — A Preliminary Report.” In Proceedings of the Eighty-Seventh Annual Conference on Taxation. 29–36. Columbus: National Tax Association, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, Thomas A. “Evaluating the Impact of School Finance Reform on the Provision of Education: The California Case.” National Tax Journal 45 (December, 1992): 405–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, Thomas A. and Thomas F. Pogue. “Accounting for Fiscal Capacity and Need in the Design of School Aid Formulas.” In Fiscal Equalization for State and Local Government Finance, edited by John E. Anderson. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, Thomas A. and David Schoeman. “School Financing Reform and Private School Enrollment: Evidence from California.” Unpublished working paper, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, Thomas A. and Mona P. Shah. “The Effect of School Finance Reform on the Level and Growth of Per Pupil Expenditures.” Unpublished working paper, October 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple, Dennis and Richard E. Romano. “Public School Choice and Finance Policies, Neighborhood Formation, and the Distribution of Educational Benefits.” Unpublished working paper, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, William N., Sheila E. Murray, and Robert M. Schwab. “School Houses, Court Houses, and State Houses after Serrano.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, William N., Wallace E. Oates, and Robert M. Schwab. ”Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (October, 1992): 966–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin S. “Wealth Neutrality and Local Choice in Public Education.” American Economic Review 45 (March, 1975): 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, Raquel and Richard Rogerson. “Income Distribution, Communities, and the Quality of Public Education.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (February, 1996): 135–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, Raquel and Richard Rogerson. “Public Education and Income Distribution: A Quantitative Evaluation of Education Finance Reform.” Unpublished working paper, August 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, William A. “Did Serrano Cause Proposition 13?” National Tax Journal 42 (December, 1989): 465–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, William A. “How Serrano Caused Proposition 13.” Unpublished working paper, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Ronald C. State and Local Public Finance (2nd edition). Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz, Margaret E. “School Finance Reform in New Jersey: The Saga Continues.” Journal of Education Finance 18 (Spring, 1993): 346–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, Thomas A. and Lawrence W. Kenny. “The Legacy of Serrano: The Impact of Mandated Equal Spending on Private School Enrollment.” Unpublished working paper, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Eric A. “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools.” Journal of Economic Literature 24 (September, 1986): 1141–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hisht, Joseph C. “Full State Funding and the Distribution of Educational Resources in Hawaii.” National Tax Journal 27 (March, 1974): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, Christopher and Susan E. Mayer. “The Social Consequences of Growing Up in a Poor Neighborhood.” In Inner City Poverty in the United States, edited by Laurence E. Lynn, Jr. and Michael G. H. McGeary. Washington: National Academy Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Helen F. and John Yinger. “The Case for Equalizing Aid.” National Tax Journal 47 (1994): 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manwaring, Robert L. and Steven M. Sheffrin. “Litigation, School Finance Reform, and Aggregate Educational Spending.” Unpublished paper, August 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Sheila E. “Two Essays on the Distribution of Education Resources and Outcomes.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Sheila E., William N. Evans and Robert M. Schwab. “Education Finance Reform and the Distribution of Education Resources.” Unpublished working paper, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nechyba, Thomas J. “Public School Finance in a General equilibrium Tiebout World: Equalization Programs, Peer Effects, and Competition.” Unpublished working paper, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, William H. “Fiscal Equalization: An Empty Box?” National Tax Journal 47 (1994): 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picus, Lawrence O. “Cadillacs or Chevrolets?: The Evolution of State Control over School Finance in California.” Journal of Education Finance 17 (Summer, 1991): 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picus, Lawrence O. and Linda Hertert. “Three Strikes and You’re Out: Texas School Finance After Edgewood III.” Journal of Education Finance 18 (Spring, 1993): 366–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschovsky, Andrew. “Fiscal Equalization and School Finance.” National Tax Journal 47 (1994): 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Paul. “The Demand for Education with ‘Power Equalizing’ Aid.” Journal of Public Economics 49 (1992): 135–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinfeld, Daniel L. “California Fiscal Federalism: A School Finance Perspective.” Unpublished working paper, June 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, Fabio and Jon Sonstelie. “Did Serrano Cause a Decline in School Spending?” National Tax Journal, 47 (June, 1995): 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonstelie, Jon. “The Welfare Costs of Free Public Schools.” Journal of Political Economy 90 (August, 1982): 794–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, Neil D. and Lawrence O. Picus. “Living with equal Amounts of Less: Experiences of States with Primarily State-Funded School Systems.” Journal of Education Finance 17(1991): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, John A. “Funding and Spending in Paradixe: Notes on the Hawaii Model of Educational Finance.” Journal of Education Finance 12 (Fall, 1986): 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, David G., R. Craig Wood, and David S. Honeyman. Fiscal Leadership for Schools: Concepts and Practices. New York: Longman, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Changing Public Attitudes on Governments and Taxes. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 1994. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. “Goals 2000 Education America Act.” pub. 1. 103–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Robert Marshall. “Goals 2000 Bill Clears Senate in Early-Morning Session.” Congressional Quarterly (April 2, 1994): 804–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Education Encyclopedia. New York: Facts on File Publications, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. William N. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheila E. Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert M. Schwab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Michigan State University, USA

    Ronald C. Fisher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, W.N., Murray, S.E., Schwab, R.M. (1997). Toward Increased Centralization in Public School Finance. In: Fisher, R.C. (eds) Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5352-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5352-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6250-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5352-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation