Skip to main content

Case Studies and Comparison between Different Methods

  • Chapter
Rock Stress and Its Measurement
  • 1085 Accesses

Abstract

The previous five chapters have described various techniques of rock stress measurements. In this chapter we present several case studies where some of those techniques have been used at the same site either in a complementary manner or as a cross-check. Several examples of comparison between different methods are presented. Such comparisons are recommended in practice as they provide an additional measure of consistency and reliability with regard to the methods used and the stresses measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bjarnason, B. and Stephansson, O. (1986) Hydraulic rock stress measurements in borehole Gi-1 GideÃ¥ study site, Sweden. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm, SKB Technical Report 86-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.T. and Cramer, M.L. (1983) The design and construction of a block test in closely jointed rock. Rockwell International Report RHO-BW-SA-286 P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.M., Leijon, B.A. and Hustrulid, W.A. (1986) Stress distribution within an artificially loaded, jointed block, in Proc. Int. Symp. on Rock Stress and Rock Stress Measurements, Stockholm, Centek Publ., LuleÃ¥, pp. 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, N.A. (1993) Bored raise overcoring for in situ stress determination at the Underground Research Laboratory. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 30, 989–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, N.A. and Martin, D. (1991) An examination of the conditions causing subhorizontal hydraulic fractures in a highly stressed granite batholith, in Proc. 32nd US Symp. Rock Mech., Norman, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, N.A. and Martin, D. (1994) The influence of near surface faults on in-situ stresses in the Canadian shield, in Proc. 1st North Amer. Rock Mech. Symp., Austin, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooling, C.M., Hudson, J.A. and Tunbridge, L.W. (1988) In-situ rock stresses and their measurement in the UK — Part II. Site experiments and stress field interpretation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 25, 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornet, F.H. and Burlet, D. (1992) Stress field determinations in France by hydraulic tests in boreholes. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 11829–11849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornet, F.H. and Valette, B. (1984) In situ stress determination from hydraulic injection test data. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 11527–11537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enever, J.R. and Chopra, P.N. (1986) Experience with hydraulic fracture stress measurements in granite, in Proc. Int. Symp. on Rock Stress and Rock Stress Measurements, Stockholm, Centek Publ., LuleÃ¥, pp. 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enever, J.R., Walton, R.J. and Wold, M.B. (1990) Scale effects influencing hydraulic fracture and overcoring stress measurements, in Proc. Int. Workshop on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Loen, Norway, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, E.C. et al. (1983a) Applicability of borehole stress measurement instrumentation to closely jointed rock, in Proc. 24th US Symp. Rock Mech., College Station, Association of Eng. Geologists Publ., pp. 283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, E.C. et al. (1983b) In situ stress measurement in a jointed basalt, in Proc. Rapid Excavation & Tunneling (RETC) Conf., Chicago, Vol. 1, SME/ AIME, pp. 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimson, B. (1980) Near surface and deep hydrofracturing stress measurements in Waterloo quartzite. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 17, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimson, B.C. (1981) Confirmation of hydrofracturing results through comparisons with other stress measurements, in Proc. 22nd US Symp. Rock Mech., Cambridge, MIT Publ., pp. 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimson, B.C. (1983) The state of stress at the Nevada Test Site: a demonstration of the reliability of hydrofracturing and overcoring techniques, in Proc. Int. Symp. Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Zurich, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimson, B.C. et al. (1989) Measurement of rock stress using the hydraulic fracturing method in Cornwall, UK — Part II. Data reduction and stress calculation. Int.J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 26, 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, S.H., Healy, J.H. and Zoback, M.D. (1985) In situ stress, natural fracture distribution, and borehole elongation in the Auburn Geothermal Well, Auburn, New York. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5497–5512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J.A. and Cooling, C.M. (1988) In situ rock stresses and their measurement in the UK — Part I. The current state of knowledge. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 25, 363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, P.K., Zou, D. and Lang, P.A. (1990) Stress determination by back-analysis of excavationinduced stress changes — a case study. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 23, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P.A., Thompson, P.M. and Ng, L.K.W. (1986) The effect of residual stress and drill hole size on the in situ stress determined by overcoring, in Proc. Int. Symp. on Rock Stress and Rock Stress Measurements, Stockholm, Centek Publ., LuleÃ¥, pp. 687–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijon, B.A. and Stillborg, B.L. (1986) A comparative study between two rock stress measurement techniques at Luossavaara mine. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 19, 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljunggren, C. (1990) Hydraulic fracturing and hydraulic tests on pre-existing fractures in a foliated rock — a comparison of results and techniques, in Proc. 31st US Symp. Rock Mech., Golden, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1027–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljunggren, C. and Raillard, G. (1986) In situ stress determination by hydraulic tests on pre-existing fractures at GideÃ¥ test site, Sweden. LuleÃ¥ University of Technology, Sweden, Research Report TULEA 1986:22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljunggren, C. and Raillard, G. (1987) Rock stress measurements by means of hydraulic tests on pre-existing fractures at GideÃ¥ test site, Sweden. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 24, 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.D. (1989) Characterizing in-situ stress domains at AECL’s underground research laboratory, in Proc. 42nd Can. Geotech. Conf., Winnipeg, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.D. and Chandler, N.A. (1993) Stress heterogeneity and geological structures. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 30, 993–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.D. and Christiansson, R. (1991) Overcoring in highly stressed granite: comparison between USBM and CSIR devices. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 24, 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.D. and Simmons, G.R. (1993) The Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Underground Research Laboratory: an overview of geomechanics characterization, in Comprehensive Rock Engineering (ed. J.A. Hudson), Pergamon Press, Oxford, Chapter 38, Vol. 3, pp. 915–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.D., Read, R.S. and Chandler, N.A. (1990) Does scale influence in-situ stress measurements? — Some findings at the Underground Research Laboratory, in Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Loen, Norway, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.D., Read, R.S. and Lang, P.A. (1990) Seven years of in-situ stress measurements at the URL. An overview, in Proc. 31st US Symp. Rock Mech., Golden, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.D., Martino, J.B. and Dzik, E.J. (1994) Comparison of borehole breakouts from laboratory and field tests, in Proc. Eurock’ 94: Int. Symp. on Rock Mech. in Petrol. Eng., Delft, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillet, F.L. and Kim, K. (1987) Character and distribution of borehole breakouts and their relationship to in situ stresses in deep Columbia river basalts. J. Geophys. Res., 92, 6223–6234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, R.J., Tunbridge, L.W. and Kwakwa, K. (1983a) In-situ stress measurement in the Carnmenellis granite — I. Overcoring tests at South Crofty Mine at a depth of 790 m. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 20, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, R.J., Tunbridge, L.W. and Kwakwa, K. (1983b) In-situ stress measurement in the Carnmenellis granite — II Hydrofracture tests at Rosemanowes quarry to depths of 2000 m. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 20, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, R.J., Jupe, A. and Tunbridge, L.W. (1990) An evaluation of in-situ stress measurements affecting different volumes of rock in the Carnmenellis granite, in Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Scale Effects in Rock Masses, Loen, Norway, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, R.A. and Hickman, S.H. (1985) Stressinduced borehole elongation: a comparison between the four-arm dipmeter and the borehole televiewer in the Auburn Geothermal Well. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5513–5521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist, J. (1995a) Determination of hydraulic normal stiffness of fractures in hard rock from well testing. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 32, 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist, J. (1995b) A method to determine stress-transmissivity relationship of joints from hydraulic testing, in Proc. 8th Cong. Int. Soc. Rock Mech. (ISRM), Tokyo, Balkema, Rotterdam, Vol. 2, pp. 755–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist, J. and Stephansson, O. (1996) A cyclic hydraulic jacking test to determine the in situ stress normal to a fracture. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 33, 695–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, G. and Zoback, M.D. (1992) Stress orientation profile to 3.5 km depth near the San Andreas Fault at Cajon Pass, California. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 5059–5080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi, S. and Young, R.P. (1989) Failure mechanism of crack propagation induced by shaft excavation at the Underground Research Laboratory, in Proc. Int. Symp. Rock Mech. and Rock Physics at Great Depth, Pau, Balkema, Rotterdam, Vol. 3, pp. 1455–1461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebi, S. and Young, R.P. (1992) Microseismic monitoring in highly stressed granite: relation between shaft-wall cracking and in situ stress. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sei & Geomech. Abstr., 29, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.M. (1990) A borehole deformation gauge for stress determinations in deep boreholes, in Proc. 31st US Symp. Rock Mech., Golden, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.M., Lang, P.A. and Snider, G.R. (1986) Recent improvements to in-situ stress measurements using the overcoring method, in Proc. 39th Can. Geotech. Conf., Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heerden, W.L. and Grant, R (1967) A comparison of two methods for measuring stress in rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sei, 4, 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernik, L. and Zoback, M.D. (1992) Estimation of maximum horizontal principal stress magnitude from stress-induced well bore breakouts in the Cajon Pass scientific research borehole. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 5109–5119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, T.D. and Kaiser, P.K. (1994a) In-situ stress determination using the under-excavation technique-1: theory. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sei & Geomech. Abstr., 31, 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, T.D. and Kaiser, P.K. (1994b) In-situ stress determination using the under-excavation technique-1: applications. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 31, 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback, M.D. and Healy, J.H. (1992) In situ stress measurements to 3.5 km depth in the Cajon Pass scientific research borehole: implications for the mechanics of crustal faulting. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 5039–5057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, D. and Kaiser, P.K. (1990) In situ stress determination by stress change monitoring, in Proc. 31st US Symp. Rock Mech., Golden, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amadei, B., Stephansson, O. (1997). Case Studies and Comparison between Different Methods. In: Rock Stress and Its Measurement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5346-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5346-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6247-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5346-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics