Abstract
In earlier discussions of the philosophy of science, philosophers such as Reichenbach (1938) distinguished between the “context of discovery” and the “context of justification.” The context of justification was concerned with the evidential basis for belief in scientific hypotheses and with the logical structure of science, whereas the context of discovery was left to psychology. More recently, philosophers of science such as Laudan (1980) and Nickles (1980b) have suggested a third classification, that of pursuit, the further investigation of a theory or an experimental result. In addition, recent studies of science, which emphasize scientific practice, have emphasized that science is a complex activity demanding a richer description than just discovery and justification.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franklin, A. (1999). Discovery, Pursuit, and Justification. In: Can that be Right?. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 199. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5334-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5334-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6242-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5334-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive