Skip to main content

Combining Single View Features and Asymmetry for Detection of Mass Lesions

  • Chapter
Digital Mammography

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 13))

Abstract

Radiologists in breast cancer screening are trained to use comparisons of left and right mammograms to identify suspicious asymmetric densities. Asymmetry is not a very specific sign, as the majority of asymmetric densities are due to normal variation of the parenchymal pattern. However, when an asymmetric density has some of the characteristics that are typical for a malignant mass or appears in a region that should normally be empty, it may be suspicious. Previously, we have developed a method for detecting stellate and circumscribed masses in mammograms from single views [5], [11], based on a statistical analysis of line and gradient orientation patterns. In this study we investigated the use of a local measure of asymmetry as an additional feature, with the aim of improving overall detection performance on a large consecutive sample of screening cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bookstein, F. L. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE PAMI 11,6 (1989), 567–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giger, M. L., Lu, P., Huo, Z., Bick, U., Vyborny, C. J., Schmidt, R. A., Zhang, W., Metz, C. E., Wolverton, D., Nishikawa, R. M., Zouras, W., and Doi, K. Cad in digital mammography: computerized detection and classification of masses. In Digital Mammography (1994), A. G. Gale, S. M. Astley, D. R. Dance, and A. Y. Cairns, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hlghnam, R. P., Brady, J. M., and Shepstone, B. J. A representation for mammographic image processing. Med Imag Analysis 1 (3 1996), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karssemeuer, N. Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys Med Biol 43 (1998), 365–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karssemeuer, N., and te Brake, G. M. Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 15 (10 1996), 611–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lau, T. K., and Bischof, W. F. Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. Comp and Biomed Research 24 (1991), 273–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, P., and Astley, S. M. Automated detection of mammographic asymmetry using anatomical features. Int. Journal of Pattern Recognition and AI 7, 6 (1992), 1461–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sallam, M., and Bowyer, K. W. Registering time-sequences of mammograms using a two-dimensional unwarping technique. In Digital Mammography (1994), A. G. Gale, S. M. Astley, D. R. Dance, and A. Y. Cairns, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, J. H., Astley, S. M., Graham, J., and Hufton, A. P. The calibration of grey levels in mammograms. In Digital Mammography (1996), K. Doi, M. L. Giger, R. M. Nishikawa, and R. A. Schmidt, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D. R., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C. R. M., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S. L., Taylor, P., Betal, D., and Savage, J. The mammographie image analysis society digital mammogram database. In Digital Mammography (1994), A. G. Gale, S. M. Astley, D. R. Dance, and A. Y. Cairns, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 375–378.

    Google Scholar 

  11. te Brake, G. M., and Karssemeuer, N. Detection of stellate breast abnormalities. In Digital Mammography (1996), K. Doi, M. L. Giger, R. M. Nishikawa, and R. A. Schmidt, Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 341–346.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yin, F. F., Giger, M. L., Doi, K., Metz, C. E., Vyborny, C. J., and Schmidt, R. A. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: Analysis of bilateral substraction images. Med Phys 18 (1991), 955–963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yin, F. F., Giger, M. L., Vyborny, C. J., Doi, K., and Schmidt, R. A. Comparison of bilateral-substraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographie masses. Invest Radiol 6 (1993), 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karssemeijer, N., Te Brake, G. (1998). Combining Single View Features and Asymmetry for Detection of Mass Lesions. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds) Digital Mammography. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6234-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5318-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics