Skip to main content

A Computer Assisted Diagnostic System for Mass Detection

  • Chapter
Digital Mammography

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 13))

Abstract

Computer assisted diagnostic (CAD) methods have been proposed as a “second opinion” strategy for breast cancer screening using digital mammography. The reported methods have included the detection of either microcalcification clusters or masses [1]. Mass detection poses a more difficult problem compared to microcalcification cluster detection because masses are often: (a) of varying size, shape, and density, (b) exhibit poor image contrast, (c) are highly connected to the surrounding parenchymal tissue density, particularly for spiculated lesions, and (d) are surrounded by non-uniform tissue background with similar characteristics [2]–[4]. The segmentation of masses and the computation of related pixel intensity, morphological, and directional texture features poses difficult problems in terms of improved feature extraction methods, as required for classification methods that distinguish masses from normal tissues. Improved and robust feature extraction has not been emphasizes in the literature. Examples include features such as mass shape or mass margin analysis, or spiculations for spiculated lesions [5]. Mass detection is proposed here as a good clinical model for the motivation for proposing a new class of adaptive CAD methods for image preprocessing, to improve feature extraction. The methods proposed are useful for other CAD applications such as the detection of microcalcifications and lung nodules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. L. Giger, “Computer-aided diagnosis,” RSNA Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Physics, Technical Aspects of Breast Imaging, eds. AG Haus, MJ Yaffe, 283–298, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. W. Bassett, D. H. Bunnell, R. H. Jahashahi, R. H. Gold, R. D. Arndt, and J. Linsman, “Breast cancer detection: One versus two views,” Radiology 165, 95–97, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. A. Sickle, W. N. Weber, and H. B. Galvin, “Baseline screening mammography: One vs two views per breast,” American J. Roentgenol, 147, 1149–1153, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Wolverton, R. M Nishikawa, W. Zouras, K. Doi, “CAD in Digital Mammography: Computerized detection and classification of masses,” Digital Mammography, Gale A.G. et al, eds, Elsevier Science B.V., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. P. Kegelmeyer, J. M. Pruneda, P. D. Bourland, A. Hillis, M. W. Riggs, M. L. Nipper, “Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions,” Radiology, vol. 191, 331–337, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Gupta, P. E. Undrill, “The use of texture analysis to delineate suspicious masses in mammography,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol.40, 835–855, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Petrick, H. P. Chan, B. Sahiner, D. Wei, M. A. Helvie, M. M. Goodsitt and D. D. Adler, “Automated detection of breast masses on digital mammograms using a convolution neural network for morphological and texture classification,” Proc. of World Congress on Neural Networks, vol.2, 872–875, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Brzakovic, X. M. Luo, P. Brzakovic, “An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms,” IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol.9, 233–241, 1990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. W. P. Kegelmeyer, “Evaluation of stellate lesion detection in a standard mammogram data set,” Proc. of SPIE vol. 1905, 787–793, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Huo, M.L. Giger, C.J. Vyborny, U. Bick, P. Lu, D. E. Wolverton, and R. A. Schmidt, “Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses,” Medical Physics, 22(10), 1569–1579, Oct., 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M.R. Anderberg, Clustering Analysis for Application, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Karssemeijer, “Recognition of stellate lesions in digital mammograms,” Digital Mammography. Gale A.G. et al, eds, Elsevier Science B.V., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Karssemeijer and G. M. te Brake, “Detection of stellate distortion in mammograms,” IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, vol.15, no.5, Oct. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Qian, L.P. Clarke, et al., “Digital mammography: M-channel quadrature mirror filters for microcalcification extraction,” Computerized Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 18, No.5, pp 301–314, Sept./Oct., 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Qian, L.P. Clarke, “Hybrid M-channel wavelet transform methods: adaptive, automatic and digital X-ray sensor independent,” Medical Physics, vol. 22(6), 983–984, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Li, W. Qian and L.P. Clarke, “Digital mammography: CAD method for mass detection using multiresolution and multiorientation wavelet transforms,” Academic Radiology, Oct, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Li, W. Qian, F. Mao, L.P. Clarke, “Wavelet transform for directional feature extraction in medical imaging,” Proc. of Int. Conf. on Image Processing, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Qian, L. Li and L. P. Clarke, “Digital mammography: Wavelet based CAD method for mass detection,” Proc. of SPIE Medical Imaging, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Qian, L. P. Clarke, M. Kallergi, H. D. Li, R. P. Velthuizen, R. A. Clark, and M. L. Silbiger, “Tree-structured nonlinear filter and wavelet transform for microcalcification segmentation in mammography,” Proc of the IS&T/SPIE Annual Symposium on Electronic Imaging, Science & Technology, San Jose, California, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Qian, L. P. Clarke, M. Kallergi, B. Y. Zheng, P. Venugopal, R. A. Clark, M. L. Silbiger, “Application of Wavelet Transform for Image Enhancement in Medical Imaging,” Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, ASME, vol. 4, 651–660, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Qian, L. P. Clarke, M. Kallergi, R. A. Clark, “Tree-structured nonlinear filters in digital mammography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 13(1), 25–36, 1994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. L. P. Clarke, B. Zheng, W. Qian, “Artificial Neural Network for Pattern Recognition in Mammography,” Invited paper: World Congress on Neural Networks, CA, June 4–9, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Li, W. Qian, LP. Clarke, “X-ray medical image processing using directional wavelet transform,” Proceeding of IEEE Int. Conf. on ASSP, vol.4, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W. Qian, L. P. Clarke, M. Kallergi, B. Zheng, R. A. Clark, “Wavelet Transform for Computer Assisted Diagnosis (CAD) for Digital Mammography,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Invited Paper, vol.14(5), 561–569, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Qian, L. P. Clarke, “Wavelet-based neural network with fuzzy-logic adaptivity for nuclear image restoration,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Special Issue on Applications of Neural Networks, Invited paper, vol.84, no. 10, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. N. Pappas, “An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation,” IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, vol.40(2), 902–914, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.R. Anderberg, Clustering Analysis for Application, Academic Press, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H.D. Li, M. Kallergi, L. P. Clarke, V. K. Jain and R. A. Clark, “Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography,” IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 14(3), 565–576, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. A.K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Doi, “Overview of state of the art and future requirements,” Session 5B, Image Processing and Computer Assisted Diagnosis (CAD), Office of Womon’s Health (OWH) Workshop on Digital Mammography, Washinton DC, June 1–2, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Velthuizen R.P. and Clarke L.P. “Image Standardization for Digital Mammography“ 8th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM’98) Nijmegen, Netherlands, June 7–10 1998

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qian, W., Li, L., Clarke, L., Mao, F., Clark, R.A., Thomas, C.J. (1998). A Computer Assisted Diagnostic System for Mass Detection. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds) Digital Mammography. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6234-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5318-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics