Abstract
Rousseau often rejects market exchange. He again and again expresses his preference for autarchic modes of provision and the immediacy between production and consumption. Similarly, when writing auto-biographically he testifies to a desire to live independently and transparently. Jean Starobinski has argued forcefully that the former, Rousseau’s rejection of market exchange, is generated by the latter. His personal emotional disposition has been redressed to a general ideological aversion against market exchange. Others have taken this as evidence that his rejection is not based on rational argument. They have treated it as a basic judgment (that is to say, as an emotionally-founded one). A closer look shows, however, that a consistent and careful economic analysis is hidden underneath the various formulations and that the market rejection is a nonbasic part of his philosophy.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fridén, B. (1998). The Market as a Brothel. In: Rousseau’s Economic Philosophy. International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées, vol 159. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5294-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5294-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6228-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5294-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive