Skip to main content

Uncertainty Assessment of Biogenic Emissions Estimates and Its Impact on Ozone Attainment Control Strategy Selection

  • Chapter
  • 243 Accesses

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASEN2,volume 40))

Abstract

The regulatory community continues to issue guidance on air quality planning which encourages planners to rely on best, single value emissions estimates for use in the air quality modeling process. Little if any guidance is issued on how to assess and use uncertain emissions estimates to evaluate control strategy selection. In particular, biogenic emissions are interesting in that they are highly uncertain, and they are unaffected by traditional anthropogenic control technologies. Yet, biogenic emissions impact air quality particularly impacting the effectiveness of stringent controls on volatile organic compounds. Therefore, because emissions controls cost billions of dollars annually, it is prudent to investigate the impacts that uncertainty in biogenic emissions estimates (and in general, all emissions estimates) has on emissions control scenarios.

In this study, the consequences are shown of how improved biogenic emissions estimates impact air quality modeling results and the degree to which uncertain biogenic emissions affect emissions control strategy selection in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) of Los Angeles, California. First, the ranges in the biogenic emissions estimates due to uncertainty in data and model parameters are as follows (all values reported at the 95% confidence interval): isoprene ranges from 0.03 to 3.7 times the expected value (1800 tons/day); nitric oxide ranges from 0.22 to 72 times the expected value (99 tons/day); other volatile organic compounds range from 0.54 to 1.7 times the expected value (980 tons/day); and monoterpenes range from 0.54 to 1.8 times the expected value (700 tons/day). Second, the improved biogenic emissions estimates (50th percentile) for the SoCAB increase the modeled ozone peak from 178 ppb (base case simulation with previous biogenic emissions estimates) to 216 ppb for August 29, 1987 which is the last day of the three day episode. Finally, when the uncertain biogenic emissions estimates are propagated through a photochemical model, the results indicate that NOx control strategies are favored over VOC control strategies. This finding contradicts the recent findings by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) which show that VOC emissions controls will preferentially help mitigate the ozone problem in the SoCAB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. NRC, 1991. Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seinfeld, J., 1986. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution. Wiley Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and J. N. Pitts, 1986. Atmospheric Chemistry. Wiley Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mlot, C, 1995. “A Clearer View of Why Plants Make Haze.” Science, Volume 268, May

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce, T. E., B. K. Lamb, and A. R. Van Meter, 1990. “Development of a Biogenic Emissions Inventory System for Regional Scale Air Pollution Models.” Paper 90–94.3. In the Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association, 24–29 June, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lamb, B. K., D. Gay, H. Westberg, and T. E. Pierce, 1993. “A Biogenic Hydrocarbon Emissions Inventory for the U.S.A. Using a Simple Forest Canopy Model.” Atmospheric Environment, 27A: 1673–1690.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pier, P. A., 1995. “Isoprene Emission Rates from Northern red Oak Using a Whole-Tree Chamber.” Atmospheric Environment, 29 (12): 1347–1353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Winer, A. M., J. Arey, S. M. Aschmann, R. Atkinson, W. D. Long, C. L. Morrison, and D. M. Olszyk, 1992. “Emission Rates of Organics from Vegetation in California’s Central Valley.” Atmospheric Environment, 26A: 2647–2659.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guenther, A., R. Monson, and R. Fall, 1991. “Isoprene and Monoterpene Emission Rate Variability: Observations with Eucalyptus and Emission Rate Algoritlun Development.” Journal of Geophysical Research, 96:10799–10808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tingey, D. T., M. Manning, L. C. Grothaus, and W. F. Burns, 1980. “Influence of Light and Temperature on Monoterpene Emission Rates from Slash Pine.” Physiological Plantarum, 65: 797–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tingey, D. T., M. Manning, L. C. Grothaus, and W. F. Burns, 1979. “Influence of Light and Temperature on Isoprene Emissions from Live Oak.” Physiological Plantarum, 47: 112–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmerman, P. R., 1979. “Tampa Bay Area Photochemical Oxidant Study. Determination of Emissions Rates of Hydrocarbons from Indigenous Species of Vegetation in the Tampa/ St. Petersburg, Florida Area.” EPA 904/9–77–028, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winer, A. M., L. Chinkin, J. Arey, R. Atkinson, J. Adams, J. Karlik, 1995. “Critical Evaluation of a Biogenic Emission System for Photochemical Grid Modeling in California.” Final Report to the California Air Resources Board, Contract Number 93–725, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilkinson, J. G., T. E. Pierce, R A. Emigh, 1995. “An Intercomparison of Biogenic Emissions Estimates from BEIS2 and BIOME: Reconciling the Differences.” For presentation at the 1995 AWMA Emissions Inventory Conference, RTP, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  15. CFR, 1995. Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 91), Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  16. SCAQMD, 1996. Draft 1997 Draft Air Quality Management Plan.http://www.aqmd.gov/aqmp/97draft/execs.html

    Google Scholar 

  17. SCAQMD, 1994a. Air Quality Trends, 1976–1993. Appendix II-B, September 1994 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SCAQMD, 1994b. Summary of Air Quality, 1990–1993. Appendix II-A, April 1994 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SCAQMD, 1994c. Ozone Attainment Demonstration for the South Coast Air Basin. Appendix V-A, September 1994 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chameides, W., R. Lindsay, J. Richardson, and C. Kiang, 1988. “The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study,” Science, 241, 1473–1475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tingey, D., 1981. “The effect of environmental factors on the emission of biogenic hydrocarbons from live oak and slash pine.” Atmospheric Biogenic Hydrocarbons. edited by J. Bufalini and R. Arnts, pages 53–72, Butterworth, Stoneham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guenther, A., P. R. Zimmerman, P. C. Harley, R. K. Monson, R Fall, 1993. “Isoprene and Monoterpene Emission Rate Variability: Model Evaluations and Sensitivity Analysis.” Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 98, Number D7:12609–12617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geron, C. D., A. B. Guenther, T. E. Pierce, 1994. “An improved model for estimating emissions of volatile organic compounds from forests in the eastern United States.” Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 99, Number D6:12773–12791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, E. J., A. Guenther, and F. C. Fehsenfeld, 1992. “An Inventory of Nitric Oxide Emissions from Soils in the United States.” Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 97, Number D7:7511–7519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkinson, J. G., C. F. Loomis, R. A. Emigh, D. E. McNally, T. W. Tesche, 1994. “Technical Formulation Document: SARMAP/LMOS Emissions Modeling System (EMS-95).” Final report prepared for the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (Des Plaines, IL) and the Valley Air Pollution Study Agency (Sacramento, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fall, R. And R. Monson, 1992. “Isoprene emission rate and intercellular isoprene concentration as influenced by stomatal distribution and conductance.” Plant Physiology, 100, pages 987–992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guenther, A., 1997. Personal Communication. January 6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Williams, E. J., 1997. Personal Communication. January 7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guenther, A., 1995. Personal Communication. December 14.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shepherd, M. F., S. Barzetti, and D. R. Hastie, 1991. “The production of atmospheric NOx and N2O from fertilized agricultural soil.” Atmospheric Environment, 25A:1961–1969.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams, E. J., D. D. Parrish, M. P. Buhr, and F. C. Fehsenfeld, 1988. “Measurement of Soil NOx Emissions in central Pennsylvania.” Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 93:9539–9546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Iqbal, M., 1983. An Introduction To Solar Radiation. Academic Press, New York, 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harley, R. A., A. G. Russell, G. J. McRae, L. A. McNair, D. A. Winner, M. T. Odman, D. Dabdub, G. R. Cass, and J. H. Seinfeld, 1992. “Continued Development of a Photochemical Model and Application to the Southern California Air Quality Study (SCAQS) Intensive Monitoring Periods: Phase I.” Final Report to the Coordinating Research Council Project: SCAQS - 8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kinnee, E., C. D. Geron, T. Pierce, and T. Birth, 1995. “Creation of a land use inventory for estimating biogenic ozone precursor emissions in the United States.” Submitted for publication in Ecological Applications.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pierce, T. E., 1996a. “Documentation for /beis2/SOS/.” ftp://monsoon.rtpnc.epa.gov/pub/beis2/SOS/AAREADME/pub/beis2/SOS/AAREADME.

  36. NREL, 1994. “Estimating the Uncertainty of Solar Radiation Data.” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/solrad/method-3.html/renewables/solrad/method-3.html.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pierce, T. E. and C. D. Geron, 1996. The personal computer version of the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (PCBEIS2.2). AAREADME, anonymous ftp at monsoon.rtpnc.epa.gov located in /pub/beis2/pcbeis22.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pierce, T. E., 1996b. Personal Communication. November 21.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Benjamin, M. T., M. Sudol, L. Bloch, and A. M. Winer, 1996. “Low-Emitting Urban Forests: A Taxonomic Methodology For Assigning Isoprene And Monoterpene Emission Rates ” Atmospheric Environment, Volume 30, Number 9:1437–1452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Iman, R. L. and M. J. Shortencarier, 1984. “A FORTRAN 77 Program And User’s Guide For The Generation f Latin Hypercube And Random Samples For Use With Computer Models.” Prepared for the Division of Risk Analysis and Operations, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. NUREG/CR-3624, SAND83–2365, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuqerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Iman, R L and J. C. Helton, 1985. “A Comparison of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models.” Prepared for the Division of Risk Analysis and Operations, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. NUREG/CR-3904, SAND84–1461, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Winer, A. M., D. R. Fitz, and P. R. Miller, 1983. “Investigation of the Role of Natural Hydrocarbons in Photochemical Smog formation in California.” Report to the California Air Resources Board, Contract Number A0–056–32, Statewide Air Pollution Research Center, University of California at Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lurmann, F. W., H. H. Main, 1992. “Analysis Of The Ambient VOC Data Collected In The Southern California Air Quality Study.” Final Report to the California Air Resources Board, Contract Number A832–130.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pierson, W. R., A. W. Gertler, and R. L. Bradow, 1990. “Comparison of the SCAQS Tunnel Study with Other On-Road Vehicle Emissions Data.” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, Volume 40:1495–1504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ingalls, M. N., L. R. Smith, and R. E. Kirksey, 1989. “Measurement of On-Road Vehicle Emission in the California South Coast Air Basin - Volume I: Regulated Emissions.” Report to the Coordinating Research Council, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Aneja, V. P., 1994. “Workshop of the Intercomparison of Methodologies for Soil NOx Emissions: Summary of Discussion and Recommendations.” Jounal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 44: 977–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilkinson, J.G. (1998). Uncertainty Assessment of Biogenic Emissions Estimates and Its Impact on Ozone Attainment Control Strategy Selection. In: Linkov, I., Wilson, R. (eds) Air Pollution in the Ural Mountains. NATO ASI Series, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5208-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5208-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6192-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5208-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics