Abstract
Automated perimetry is a method which has largely proved its utility in the diagnosis and follow-up of certain ophthalmic pathologies1–3, as well as its functional repercussions4–6. We carried out a randomized prospective study to assess the variations in the retinal sensitivity with automated perimetry in two groups of population affected by a macular epiretinal membrane. We performed a vitrectomy with a membrane peeling in one group, while we kept the other group under observation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Flammer, J., Drance, S.M., Zulauf, M. Differential light threshold. Short-and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984; 102: 704–706.
Flammer, J. The concept of visual field indices. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1986; 224: 389–392.
Gramer, E., Althaus, G., Leydhecker, W. Localization and depth of glaucomatous visual field defects in relation to the size of the neuroretinal rim area of the disc in low-lesion glaucoma, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma; clinical study with the Octopus 201 perimeter and the optic nerve head analyzer. Klin Mbl Augenheilk. 1986; 189: 190–199.
Vilaplana, D., Barraquer, J., Massana, J., Lucas, R., Moreno, V. Temporal branch vein occlusion: laser photocoagulation and its visual field effects. Lasers Light Ophthalmol. 1992; 4: 201–207.
Duch Mestres, F., Vilaplana, D., Rutllan Civit, J., Torres, F., Barraquer, J. Static perimetry evaluation of argon green and dye red laser treatment for choroidal neovascular membranes. Lasers Light Ophthalmol. 1993; 6: 27–32.
Vilaplana, D., Moreno, V., Barraquer, J. Temporal branch vein occlusion: diode laser photocoagulation. Lasers Light Ophthalmol. 1995; 7: 37–43.
Machemer, R. Die chirurgische entferhung von epiretinalen makula membranen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1978; 173: 36–42.
Michels, R.G. Vitrectomy for macular pucker. Ophthalmology. 1984; 91: 1384–1388.
von Gunten, S., Pournaras, C.J., de Gottrau, Ph., Brazitikos, P. Facteurs prognostiques du traitement chirurgical des membranes épirétiniennes. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilikd. 1994; 204: 309–312.
Rice, T.A., De Bustros, S., Michels, R.G., Thompson, J.T., Debanne, S.M., Rowland, D.Y. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93: 602–610.
Grewing, R., Mester, U. Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80: 323–326.
Bryselbout, E., Turut, P. Les membranes épirétiniennes idiopathiques et secondaires. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1991; 14: 265–285.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vilaplana, D., Horas, M., Casaroli, R.P., Barraquer, J. (1998). Automated perimetry variations found on epiretinal macular membranes. In: Coscas, G., Piccolino, F.C. (eds) Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Macular Diseases. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5137-5_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5137-5_78
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6160-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5137-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive