Abstract
Knowledge-based configuration is both a successful application domain for AI techniques and and an active research area. An open issue in many practical domains is that of reconfiguration, typically exhibited by legacy systems that are to be extended, upgraded or simply altered. Standard configuration techniques are not necessarily suited to this task. We discuss the use of a diagnosis approach to reconfiguration. We present the differing application and representation requirements, develop a representation that is suitable for expressing the information about the required and configurable functionalities from the diagnosis point of view, present an example and discuss our experiences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alberts, L. K., Bakker, R. R., Beerkman, D. and Wognum, P. M.: 1991, Model-based redesign of technical systems, Proceedings on the Second International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis.
Bhatta, S., Goel, A. and Prabhakar, S.: 1994, Innovation in analogical design: A model-based approach. in J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘84, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 57–74.
Chittaro, L., Guida, G., Tasso, C. and Toppano, E.: 1993, Functional and telelogical knowledge in the multimodeling approach for reasoning about physical systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernatics, 23 (3), 1718–1751.
de Kleer, J.: 1991, Focusing on probable diagnoses, Proceedings AAAI, July, Anaheim, pp. 842–848.
de Kleer, J., Mackworth, A. K. and Reiter, R.: 1990, Characterizing diagnoses, Proceedings AAAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Boston, pp. 324–330.
de Kleer, J. and Williams, B. C.: 1987, Diagnosing multiple faults, Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 97–130.
Friedrich, G., Gottlob, G. and Nejdl, W.: 1990, Physical impossibility instead of fault models, Proceedings AAAI, Boston, August, pp. 331–336. Also appears in Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis, Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.
Goel, A. and Chandrasekaran, B.: 1989, Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving, Proceedings IJCAI, Detroit, August, pp. 1388–1394.
Goel, A. and Stroulia, E.: 1996, Functional device models and model-based diagnosis in adaptive design, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (Al EDAM), 10, 355–370.
Gelle, E. and Weigel, R.: 1996, Interactive configuration with constraint satisfaction, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Practical Applications of Constraint Technology (PACT), August.
Haselböck, A., Havelka, T. and Stumptner, M.: 1993, Revising inconsistent variable assignments in constraint satisfaction problems, Proceedings CSAM’93 Workshop on Constraint Processing, July, St. Petersburg, Russia. Available as Technical Report DBAI-CSP-TR 93/2.
Heinrich, M. and Jüngst, E. W.: 1991, A resource-based paradigm for the configuring of technical systems from modular components, Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on AI Applications (CALA), pp. 257–264.
McDermott, J.: 1982, R1: A rule-based configurer of computer systems, Artificial Intelligence, 19, 39–88.
Mittal, S. and Frayman, F.: 1989, Towards a generic model of configuration tasks, Proceedings 11 th IJCAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 1395–1401.
Marcus, S., Stout, J. and McDermott, J.: 1988, VT: An expert elevator designer that uses knowledge-based backtracking, Al Magazine, 9(2), 95–111.
Runkel, J. T., Balkany, A. and Birmingham, W. P.: 1994, Generating non-brittle configuration-design tools, inJ. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘84, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 183–200.
Reiter, R.: 1987, A theory of diagnosis from first principles, Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 57–95.
Rothenfluh, T., Gennari, J., Eriksson, H., Puerta, A., Tu, S. and Musen, M.: 1996, Reusable ontologies, knowledge-acquisition tools, and performance systems: PROTEGE-II solutions to Sisyphus-2. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 303–332.
Schreiber, A. T. and Birmingham, W. P.: 1996, The Sisyphus-VT initiative, Special issue, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44.
Struss, P. and Dressler, O.: 1989, Physical negation — Integrating fault models into the general diagnostic engine, Proceedings 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, August, pp. 1318–1323.
Stumptner, M. and Haselböck, A.: 1993, A generative constraint formalism for configuration problems, 3rd Congress Italian Assoc. for AI, volume 729 of Lecture Notes in AI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Stumptner, M., Haselböck, A. and Friedrich, G.: 1994, COCOS - a tool for constraint-based, dynamic configuration. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Conference on Al Applications (CALA), March, San Antonio.
Wielinga, B. and Schreiber, G.: 1997, Configuration-design problem solving, IEEE Expert, 12(2), 49–56.
Wright, J. R., Weixelbaum, E. S., Brown, K., Vesonder, G. T., Palmer, S. R., Berman, J. I. and Moore, H. G.: 1993, A Knowledge-Based Configurator that Supports Sales, Engineering, and Manufacturing at AT&T Network Systems, Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Innovative Applications of Al, AAAI Press.
Yost, G.: 1996, Implementing the Sisyphus-93 task using Soar/TAQL, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 281–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stumptner, M., Wotawa, F. (1998). Model-Based Reconfiguration. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6153-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5121-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive