Skip to main content

Abstract

Knowledge-based configuration is both a successful application domain for AI techniques and and an active research area. An open issue in many practical domains is that of reconfiguration, typically exhibited by legacy systems that are to be extended, upgraded or simply altered. Standard configuration techniques are not necessarily suited to this task. We discuss the use of a diagnosis approach to reconfiguration. We present the differing application and representation requirements, develop a representation that is suitable for expressing the information about the required and configurable functionalities from the diagnosis point of view, present an example and discuss our experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberts, L. K., Bakker, R. R., Beerkman, D. and Wognum, P. M.: 1991, Model-based redesign of technical systems, Proceedings on the Second International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta, S., Goel, A. and Prabhakar, S.: 1994, Innovation in analogical design: A model-based approach. in J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘84, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittaro, L., Guida, G., Tasso, C. and Toppano, E.: 1993, Functional and telelogical knowledge in the multimodeling approach for reasoning about physical systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernatics, 23 (3), 1718–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer, J.: 1991, Focusing on probable diagnoses, Proceedings AAAI, July, Anaheim, pp. 842–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer, J., Mackworth, A. K. and Reiter, R.: 1990, Characterizing diagnoses, Proceedings AAAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Boston, pp. 324–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer, J. and Williams, B. C.: 1987, Diagnosing multiple faults, Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 97–130.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, G., Gottlob, G. and Nejdl, W.: 1990, Physical impossibility instead of fault models, Proceedings AAAI, Boston, August, pp. 331–336. Also appears in Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis, Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, A. and Chandrasekaran, B.: 1989, Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving, Proceedings IJCAI, Detroit, August, pp. 1388–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, A. and Stroulia, E.: 1996, Functional device models and model-based diagnosis in adaptive design, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (Al EDAM), 10, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelle, E. and Weigel, R.: 1996, Interactive configuration with constraint satisfaction, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Practical Applications of Constraint Technology (PACT), August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselböck, A., Havelka, T. and Stumptner, M.: 1993, Revising inconsistent variable assignments in constraint satisfaction problems, Proceedings CSAM’93 Workshop on Constraint Processing, July, St. Petersburg, Russia. Available as Technical Report DBAI-CSP-TR 93/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M. and Jüngst, E. W.: 1991, A resource-based paradigm for the configuring of technical systems from modular components, Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on AI Applications (CALA), pp. 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J.: 1982, R1: A rule-based configurer of computer systems, Artificial Intelligence, 19, 39–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S. and Frayman, F.: 1989, Towards a generic model of configuration tasks, Proceedings 11 th IJCAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 1395–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, S., Stout, J. and McDermott, J.: 1988, VT: An expert elevator designer that uses knowledge-based backtracking, Al Magazine, 9(2), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkel, J. T., Balkany, A. and Birmingham, W. P.: 1994, Generating non-brittle configuration-design tools, inJ. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘84, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R.: 1987, A theory of diagnosis from first principles, Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 57–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenfluh, T., Gennari, J., Eriksson, H., Puerta, A., Tu, S. and Musen, M.: 1996, Reusable ontologies, knowledge-acquisition tools, and performance systems: PROTEGE-II solutions to Sisyphus-2. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, A. T. and Birmingham, W. P.: 1996, The Sisyphus-VT initiative, Special issue, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struss, P. and Dressler, O.: 1989, Physical negation — Integrating fault models into the general diagnostic engine, Proceedings 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, August, pp. 1318–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumptner, M. and Haselböck, A.: 1993, A generative constraint formalism for configuration problems, 3rd Congress Italian Assoc. for AI, volume 729 of Lecture Notes in AI, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumptner, M., Haselböck, A. and Friedrich, G.: 1994, COCOS - a tool for constraint-based, dynamic configuration. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE Conference on Al Applications (CALA), March, San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielinga, B. and Schreiber, G.: 1997, Configuration-design problem solving, IEEE Expert, 12(2), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. R., Weixelbaum, E. S., Brown, K., Vesonder, G. T., Palmer, S. R., Berman, J. I. and Moore, H. G.: 1993, A Knowledge-Based Configurator that Supports Sales, Engineering, and Manufacturing at AT&T Network Systems, Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Innovative Applications of Al, AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, G.: 1996, Implementing the Sisyphus-93 task using Soar/TAQL, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stumptner, M., Wotawa, F. (1998). Model-Based Reconfiguration. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5121-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics