Skip to main content

Aspects of a Language Model for Designing

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98
  • 307 Accesses

Abstract

This paper looks at a normative, computational model or, perhaps more accurately, model-framework, that the author has found extremely useful for exploring the creative possibilities of algorithms. It is based on a simplified approach to natural language and is aimed at the (semi-) autonomous production of art and design works which it treats as texts. In various forms, the model has been used since the late 1960s for the production of 2-D and 3-D designs, music, and dance choreography. The paper discusses some of the background to the model and relates it to the need for producing meaning in designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bel Geddes, N.: 1977, Horizons, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. D.: 1933, Aesthetic Measure, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E.: 1996, Artificial innocence: Interactions between the study of children’s drawing and artificial intelligence, in L. Candy and E. Edmonds (eds), Proceedings of Creativity and Cognition Conference, Loughborough University, Loughborough, pp. 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapanis, A.: 1976, Interactive human communication: Some lessons learned from laboratory experiments, Technical Report 5, Department of Psychology, John Hopkins University, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D.: 1987, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, I.: 1992, Why did Mozart write three symphonies in the summer of 1788?, Music Review, 53(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, J.: 1989, Morphological parsing and the lexicon, in W. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process, MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlin, S.: 1995, Distance between Zipf plots, Physica A, 216(1–2), 148–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdan, G.: 1966, The Advanced Theory of Language as Choice and Chance, Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, L.: 1961, Essential Word English, Michael Joseph, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holynski, M. and Lewis, E.: 1984, Effectiveness standards for computer graphics, Proceedings of the IEEE Small Computers in the Arts Conference, IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, pp. 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holynski, M., Garneau, R. and Lewis, E.: 1986, An adaptive graphics interface for effective visual representation, in A. A. G. Requicha (ed.), Eurographics ‘86, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jodard, P.: 1992, Design Heroes: Raymond Loewy, Harper Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, I. and Kessler, D. A.: 1995, Markov Processes: Linguistics and Zipf’s Law, Physical Review Letters, 74(22), 4559–4562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J. G., Snell, J. L. and Thompson, G. L.: 1960, Introduction to Finite Mathematics, Prentice-Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: 1989, On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that ‘Design is making sense (of things)’, Design Issues, 5(2), 9–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: 1990, Product semantics: A triangulation and four design theories, in S. Väkevä (ed.), Product Semantics ‘89, University of Industrial Arts, Helsinki, pp. A2–A23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, J.: 1970, Computer art for theatrical performance, Proceedings, ACM International Computing Symposium, ACM, Bonn, pp. 718–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, J.: 1973, An introduction to the use of computers in graphics, music, choreography and literary composition, Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, in J. D. Lomax (ed.), Computers in the Creative Arts, NCC Publications, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, J. and Friedman, P.: 1974, Procedures for Artists, Proceedings CAS Interact Conference, Edinburgh (preprints).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, J.: 1978, The Computer in Choreography, Computer, 11(8), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, J.: 1993, Chaos, complexity and design applications, in A. J. Crilly, R. A. Earnshaw, and H. Jones (eds), Applications of Fractals and Chaos, Springer, Berlin, pp. 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, J.: 1995, Artificial creativity: An algorithmic approach to art, in Beardon C. (ed.) Digital Creativity: Proceedings of CADE 95, University of Brighton, Brighton, pp. 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, L. B. and Reingold, Z.: 1994, Entropy of natural languages: Theory and experiment, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 4(5), 709–743.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. T.: 1992, Random texts exhibit Zipf Law-like word frequency distributions, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38(6), 1842–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B.: 1977, Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension, Freeman, San Francisco

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Naranan, S. and Balasubrahmayan, V. K.: 1992, Information-theoretic models in statistical linguistics: 1–2, Current Science, 63(5), 261–269 and 63(6), 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Beirne, T. H.: 1967, Dice-Composition Music, LP Record SD888/1, Barr and Stroud, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. K.: 1938, Basic English, Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: 1994, The Language Instinct, Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.: 1949, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Illinois University Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shtrikman, S.: 1994, Some comments on Zipf’s law for the Chinese language, Journal of Information Science, 20(2), 142–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, H. E. et al: 1994, Statistical and linguistic features of noncoding DNA: A heterogeneous complex system, Nuovo Cimento, 16D(9), 1339–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G. and Gips, J.: 1978, Algorithmic Aesthetics, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texeido, J.: 1998, The Product System, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Art Design and Performing Arts, Middlesex University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg, M.: 1992, Why failure rates observe Zipf law in operational software, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 41(3), 386–389.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K.: 1949, Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lansdown, J. (1998). Aspects of a Language Model for Designing. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5121-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics