Skip to main content

Locality and Lorentz-Covariance in the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Part of the book series: The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 60))

Abstract

The first derivation of Bell inequalities, which started the quantum mechanical locality discussion, was based on the assumption that measurement outcomes in EPR-Bohm-type experiments are (“deterministic”) functions of the local measuring device settings and the state of the system. Experiment violates the Bell inequalities, and therefore at least one ingredient of the premises of the derivation must be rejected in a satisfactory theoretical account of the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bohr, N. (1935), “Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality”, Nature 136, 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohr, N. (1935), “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Nature be Considered Complete?”, Physical Review 48, 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butterfield, J. (1994) “Outcome Dependence and Stochastic Einstein Locality”, Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala, D. Prawitz and D. Westerståhl (eds.), Kluwer, 385–424.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dickson, M. and Clifton, R. (1998) “Lorentz-Invariance in Modal Interpretations”, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dieks, D. (1998) “Preferred Factorizations and Consistent Property Attribution”, in Quantum Measurement: Beyond Paradox, R. Healey and G. Hellman (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis, D. (1986) Philosophical Papers, volume 2, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Redhead, M. (1987) Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vermaas, P.E., (1996) “Unique Transition Probabilities in the Modal Interpretation”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modem Physics 27, 133–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vermaas, P.E., and Dieks, D. (1995) “The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Its Generalization to Density Operators”, Foundations of Physics 25, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dieks, D. (1998). Locality and Lorentz-Covariance in the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Dieks, D., Vermaas, P.E. (eds) The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5084-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5084-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6135-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5084-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics