Goodwill, Determinism and Justification

  • Maureen Sie
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 77)


In daily life we meet and engage with other people. We are confronted with their ways of life, their values and their projects. To a certain extent we take into consideration these other people, their well-being, their ways of life, their values and their projects. We try to avoid harming them when we enter a crowded place, we try to be decent to most of them and we try to be a good friend to some of them, and so on. Because we are capable of doing this, we are capable of exercising different degrees of ill will or goodwill towards them. We can insult someone we dislike, we can ‘forget’ a friend’s birthday out of malice, and so on. People react to this displayed degree of ill will or goodwill with attitudes and feelings of resentment, moral blame, moral indignation or gratitude.


Moral Judgment Moral Responsibility Daily Practice Reactive Attitude Moral Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Benson, P. (1987), “Freedom and Value.” The Journal of Philosophy: 465–486.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, P. (1990), “The Moral Improtance of Free Action.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy XXVIII (no. 1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cockburn, D. (1995), “Responsibility and Necessity.” Philosophy 70: 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dennett, D. C.(1984), Elbow Room. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fischer, J. M. (1994), The Metaphysics of Free Will. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Frankfurt, Harry G, (1988), “Moral Responsibility and Coercion”. in: The Importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nagel, T. (1979), “Moral Luck.” In: Mortal Questions, 24–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Nagel, T. (1986), The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Russell, Paul. (1992), “Strawson’s Way of Naturalizing Responsibility.” in: Ethics 102: 287–302.Google Scholar
  10. Strawson, P. (1962), “Freedom and Resentment.” In: Free Will, ed. Watson, G. (1992), 59–81. ed., Vol. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Strawson, P. (1985), Scepticism and Naturalism. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  12. Van Inwagen, P. (1983), An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Wallace, R. J. (1994), Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge/Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Watson, G. (1987), “Responsibility and the limits of evil; variations on a Strawsonian theme”. in: Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions. Schoeman, F. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Wolf, S. (1990), Freedom within Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maureen Sie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUtrecht UniversityNetherlands

Personalised recommendations