Advertisement

Self-Awareness and Affection

  • Dan Zahavi
Chapter
Part of the Phaenomenologica book series (PHAE, volume 148)

Abstract

Manfred Frank has in recent publications criticized a number of prevailing views concerning the nature of self-awareness,1 and it is the so-called reflection theory of self-awareness which has been particularly under fire. That is, the theory which claims that self-awareness only comes about when consciousness directs its ‘gaze’ at itself, thereby taking itself as its own object. But in his elaboration of a position originally developed by Dieter Henrich (and, to a lesser extent, by Cramer and Pothast) Frank has also more generally criticized every attempt to conceive original self-awareness as a relation, be it a relation between two acts or a relation between the act and itself.2 Every relation entails a distinction between two (or more) relata and, according to Frank, it would be impossible to account for the immediacy and infallibility of self-awareness (particularly its so-called immunity to the error of misidentification), if it were in any way a mediated process. Thus, self-awareness cannot come about as the result of a self-identification, a reflection, an inner vision or introspection, nor should it be conceived as a type of intentionality or as a conceptually mediated propositional attitude, all of which entails the distinction between two or more relata. The pre-reflective self-awareness of an experience is not mediated by foreign elements such as concepts and classificatory criteria, nor by any internal difference or distance. It is an immediate and direct self-acquaintance which is characterized by being completely and absolutely irrelational (and consequently best described as a purely immanent self-presence).3

Keywords

Spatial Object Perceptual Object Primal Impression Reflection Theory Hyletic Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Benoist, J.: Autour de Husserl. Vrin, Paris 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Bernet, R.: “Die ungegenwärtige Gegenwart. Anwesenheit und Abwesenheit in Husserls Analyse des Zeitbewußtseins,” Phänomenologische Forschungen 14, 1983, pp. 16–57.Google Scholar
  3. Bernet, R.: La vie du sujet. Épiméthée PUF, Paris 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Brand, G.: Welt, Ich und Zeit. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brough, J.B.: “The Emergence of an Absolute Consciousness in Husserl’s Early Writings on Time-Consciousness,” Man and World 5, 1972, pp. 298–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Claesges, U.: Edmund Husserls Theorie der Raumkonstitution. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag 1964.Google Scholar
  7. Cramer, K.: “Erlebnis’. Thesen zu Hegels Theorie des Selbstbewußtseins mit Rücksicht auf die Aporien eines Grundbegriffs nachhegelscher Philosophie,” in H.-G. Gadamer (ed.): Stuttgarter Hegel-Tage 1970, pp.537–603, Bonn 1974.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J.: La voix et le phénomène. Épiméthée PUF, Paris 1967.Google Scholar
  9. Frank, M.: Was ist Neostrukturalismus ? Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Frank, M.: Die Unhintergehbarkeit von Individualität. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1986.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, M.: Das Sagbare und das Unsagbare. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Frank, M.: Zeitbewuβtsein. Pfullingen 1990.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, M.: Selbstbewuβtsein und Selbsterkenntnis. Reclam, Stuttgart 1991a.Google Scholar
  14. Frank, M. (ed.): Selbstbewuβtseinstheorien von Fichte bis Sartre. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1991b.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, M. (ed.): Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewuβtseins. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1994.Google Scholar
  16. Hart, J.G.: The Person and the Common Life. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1992.Google Scholar
  17. Hart, J.G.: “Constitution and Reference in Husserl’s Phenomenology of Phenomenology,” Husserl Studies 6, 1989, pp. 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heidegger, M.: Sein und Zeit. Max Niemeyer, Tübingen 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Held, K.: Lebendige Gegenwart. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag 1966.Google Scholar
  20. Held, K.: “Phänomenologie der Zeit nach Husserl,” Perspektiven der Philosophie 7, 1981, pp. 185–221.Google Scholar
  21. Henrich, D.: Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht. In Festschrift für Wolfgang Cramer, pp. 188–232. Frankfurt am Main 1966.Google Scholar
  22. Henrich, D.: “Selbstbewußtsein, kritische Einleitung in eine Theorie.” In Bubner, Cramer, Wiehl (Eds.): Hermeneutik und Dialektik, pp. 257–284. Tübingen 1970.Google Scholar
  23. Henry, M.: L’essence de la manifestation. Épiméthée PUF, Paris 1963.Google Scholar
  24. Henry, M.: Phénoménologie matérielle. Épiméthée PUF, Paris 1990.Google Scholar
  25. Holenstein, E.: “Passive Genesis: Eine begriffsanalytische Studie.” Tijd-schrift voor Filosofie 33, 1971, pp. 112–153.Google Scholar
  26. Landgrebe, L.: Der Weg der Phänomenologie. Gerd Mohn, Gütersloh 1963.Google Scholar
  27. Landgrebe, L.: “Reflexionen zu Husserls Konstitutionstheorie.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 36, 1974, pp. 466–482.Google Scholar
  28. Landgrebe, L.: Faktizität und individuation. Felix Meiner, Hamburg 1982.Google Scholar
  29. Pothast, U.: Über einige Fragen der Selbstbeziehung. Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main 1971.Google Scholar
  30. Ricoeur, P.: Soi-même comme un autre. Éditions du Seuil, Paris 1990.Google Scholar
  31. Sartre, J.-P.: L’être et le néant. Gallimard, 1943.Google Scholar
  32. Sartre, J.-P.: “Conscience de soi et connaissance de soi.” Bulletin soc. Franç. de philosophie XLII, 1948, pp. 49–91.Google Scholar
  33. Seebohm, T.: Die Bedingungen der Möglichkeit der Tranzendental-Philosophie. Bouvier, Bonn 1962.Google Scholar
  34. Straus, E.: Vom Sinn der Sinne. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zahavi, D.: Husserl und die transzendentale Intersubjektivität. Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Zahavi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations