Abstract
It is well known that Russell’s 1903 Principles of Mathematics conceived of logic as the science of structure (of propositions). The thesis of Logicism, advanced in the work, held that the intuitions of all of non-applied mathematics could be shown to be logical intuitions—intuitions based on the science of propositions. Logicism, of course, died at Russell’s own hands. Valiant as it was, the ramified type-theory of the 1910 Principia Mathematica did not salvage Logicism from Russell’s paradoxes (of classes and predication). The system offers no genuine “solution” of the paradoxes. It requires an infinity axiom and an axiom (schema) of reducibility—neither of which can be counted as truths of logic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C. Anthony (1986), “Some Difficulties Concerning Russellian Intensional Logic”, Noûs 20: 35–43.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1972), “Thinking and the Structure of the World,” Philosophia 4 (1974) 3–40; reprinted in 1975 in Critica 6 (1972) 43-86.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1979), “Fiction and Reality”, Poetics 8: 31–62.
Church, Alonzo (1974), “Russellian Simple Type Theory”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 21–33.
Cocchiarella, Nino B. (1985), “Frege’s Double Correlation Thesis and Quine’s Set Theories NF and ML”, Journal of Symbolic Logic 14: 1–39.
Cocchiarella, Nino B. (1989), “Conceptualism, Realism, and Intensional Logic”, Topoi 8: 15–34.
Landini, Gregory (1989), “New Evidence Concerning Russell’s Substitutional Theory”, Russell 9: 26–42.
Landini, Gregory (1990), “How to Russell Another Meinongian: A Russellian Theory of Fictional Objects versus Zalta’s Theory of Abstract Objects”, Grazer Philosophische Studen 37: 93–122.
Landini, Gregory (1993), “Russell to Frege, 24 May 1903: ‘I Believe Myself to Have Found Classes to Be Superfluous’”, Russell 12: 160–185.
Orilia, Francesco (1986), Natural Language Semantics and Guise Theory, Ph.D. dissertation (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Department of Philosophy).
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1980), Set Theory and Its Logic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Rapaport, William J. (1978), “Meinongian Theories of Predication and a Russellian Paradox”, Noûs 12: 153–180; errata, Noûs 13 (1979) 125.
Russell, Bertrand (1903/1937), The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd edition (London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1983).
Russell, Bertrand (1905), “On Denoting”, in Douglas Lackey (ed.), Essays in Analysis (New York: G. Braziller, 1973): 103–119.
Russell, Bertrand (1905a), “On Fundamentals”, in Alasdair Urquhart & Albeit Lewis (eds.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 4 (London: Routledge, 1994): 359–413.
Russell, Bertrand (1905b), “On Substitution”, manuscript at the Russell Archives, Mc-Master University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Russell, Bertrand (1905c), “The Theory of Implication”, American Journal of Mathematics 28 (1906) 159–202.
Russell, Bertrand (1906a), “On The Substitutional Theory of Classes and Relations”, unpublished ms. read before the London Mathematical Society in 1906, in Douglas Lackey (ed.), Essays in Analysis (New York: G. Braziller, 1973): 165–189.
Russell, Bertrand (1906b), “On’ Insolubilia’ and Their Solution by Symbolic Logic”, in Douglas Lackey (ed.), Essays in Analysis (New York: G. Braziller, 1973): 190–214.
Whitehead, Alfred North & Russell, Bertrand (1910), Principia Mathematica (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
Zalta, Edward N. (1983), Abstract Objects (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landini, G. (1998). Russell’s Intensional Logic of Propositions: A Resurrection of Logicism?. In: Orilia, F., Rapaport, W.J. (eds) Thought, Language, and Ontology. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5052-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5052-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6122-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5052-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive