Maximum Entropy and Acausal Processes: Astrophysical Applications and Challenges
In Newtonian physics, if we know the state of the world at some moment of time, then we can precisely predict the state of the world at all future times. In this sense, Newtonian physics is deterministic. In modern physics (starting with quantum mechanics), theories are usually non-deterministic in the sense that even if we know exactly the initial state of the world, we cannot uniquely predict the future state of the world. In quantum mechanics (and in most modern quantum-based physical theories), the best we can get is probabilities of different future states. In this sense, in the majority of modern physical theories, uncertainty is of statistical nature.
Lately, a new area of acausal (causality violating) processes has entered mainstream physics. This area has important astrophysical applications. It can be shown that if an acausal process is possible, then some events will take place, whose probability is normally extremely low to prevent this acausal influence from happening.
According to statistical physics, the probability of a macro-state monotonically depends on its entropy, and therefore, the state most probable to occur is the one with the maximal entropy. In this paper, we use MaxEnt to show how the possibility of acausal processes explains the isotropy of the universe and the overabundance of particles over anti-particles. We will also describe the open MaxEnt problems arising from acausal applications and show that the possibility of acausal processes leads to a field of physics where probabilities are non-frequential.
Key wordsMaximum entropy acausal processes astrophysics isotropization particle-antiparticle asymmetry future computers
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.M. Davidson, “Is time travel possible?” USA Today (Magazine), Jan. 1990, pp. 64–67.Google Scholar
- 6.P. Davies, “Wormholes and time machines,” Sky & Telescope, Jan. 1992, pp. 20–23.Google Scholar
- 8.R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. L. Sands, The Feynman Lectures On Physics, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1989.Google Scholar
- 11.S. F. Gull, “Charged Particles at Potential Steps,” In: A. Weingartshofer, D. Hestenes (eds.), The Electron, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991.Google Scholar
- 12.A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997.Google Scholar
- 13.O. M. Kosheleva and V. Kreinovich, “What can physics give to constructive mathematics,” Mathematical Logic and Mathematical Linguistics, Kalinin, 1981, pp. 117–128 (in Russian).Google Scholar
- 14.V. Kreinovich and R. Mignani, “Noncausal quantum processes and astrophysics”, Bolletino della Societa Italiana di Fisica, 1977, Vol. 112, August 29, p. 88.Google Scholar
- 15.A. N. Lasenby, C. J. L. Doran, Y. Dabrowski and A. D. Challinor, “Rotating Astrophysical Systems and a Gauge Theory Approach to Gravity,” In: N. Sanchez, A. Zichini (eds.), Advances in Astrofundamental Physics, Erice, 1996.Google Scholar
- 16.A. Lasenby, C. Doran, and S. Gull, “Gravity, Gauge Theories and Geometric Algebra,” Phil Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A., 1997 (to appear).Google Scholar
- 17.M. D. Lemonick, “How to Go Back in Time”, Time, 1991, May 13, p. 74.Google Scholar
- 18.J. W. Macvey, Time Travel: a guide to journey in the forth dimension, Scarborough House, Chelsea, MI, 1990.Google Scholar
- 20.H. Moravec, Time travel and computing, Carnegie-Mellon University, Computer Science Department, Preprint, 1991.Google Scholar
- 23.P. Nahin, Time machines: time travel in physics, metaphysics, and science fiction, American Institute of Physics, N.Y., 1993.Google Scholar
- 27.B. Parker, “Tunnels through time”, Astronomy, June 1992, pp. 28–36.Google Scholar
- 30.R. Rosen, In: R. Herken (ed.) The universal Turing machine: a half-century survey, Kammerer & Unverzagt, Hamburg, 1988, pp. 523–537.Google Scholar
- 31.R. Rosen, Life itself: a comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life, Columbia University Press, N.Y., 1991.Google Scholar
- 32.R. Rosen, “What can we know?”, In: J. L. Casti, A. Karlqvist (eds.), Beyond belief: randomness, prediction, and explanation in science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
- 33.A. D. Sakharov, “Violation of CP Invariance, C Asymmetry, and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe,” translated in Soviet Physics, JETP Letters, 1967, Vol. 5, pp. 32–35.Google Scholar
- 36.K. S. Thorne, From black holes to time warps: Einstein’s outrageous legacy, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
- 40.J. Travis, “Could a pair of cosmic strings open a route into the past?”, Science, 1992, April 10, pp. 179–180.Google Scholar
- 42.S. Weinberg, “The Quantum Theory of Massless Particles,” In: S. Deser, K. Ford (eds.), Lectures on Particles and Field Theory: 1964 Brandeis Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, Volume 2, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1965.Google Scholar