Skip to main content

The Ecological Footprint: An Indicator of Progress toward Regional Sustainability

  • Chapter
Monitoring Ecological Condition at Regional Scales

Abstract

We define regional sustainability as the continuous support of human quality of life within a region’s ecological carrying capacity. To achieve regional sustainability, one must first assess the current situation. That is, indicators of status and progress are required. The ecological footprint is an area-based indicator which quantifies the intensity of human resource use and waste discharge activity in relation to a region’s ecological carrying capacity. If the ecological footprint of a human population is greater than the area which it occupies, the population must be doing at least one of the following: receiving resources from elsewhere, disposing of some of its waste outside of the area, or depleting the area’s natural capital stocks. To achieve global sustainability, the sum of all regional footprints must not exceed the total area of the biosphere. This paper, explains the mechanics of a footprint calculation method for nations and regions. As the method is standardized, the relative ecological load imposed by nations and regions can be compared. Further, a nation’s or region’s consumption can be contrasted with its local ecological production, providing an indicator of potential vulnerability and contribution to ecological decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayres, R. and Simmonis, U. (eds.): 1994, Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development. UN University Press, Tokyo and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel, S., Braunschweig, A. and Müller-Wenk, R.: 1990, Methodik für Ökobilanzen auf der Basis ökologischer Optimierung(Methodology for life cycle assessment based on ecological optimization). Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft. Schriftenreihe Umwelt, Vol. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudepartement Basel Stadt: 1997, ‘Nur Abgasreduktion schützt dauerhaft vor Ozon’ (only a reduction in emissions will durably reduce ozone). Unser Lebensraum1/97, Baudepartement Basel Stadt, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buitenkamp, M., Venner, H. and Wams, T. (editors): 1993, 1033 Action Plan Sustainable Netherlands. Dutch Friends of the Earth. Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. E.: (this volume), ‘Emergy Analysis of Human Carrying Capacity and Regional Sustainability: An Example Using the State of Maine’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E.: 1995: How Many People Can the Earth Support? W. W. Norton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchin, F. and Lange, G. M.: 1994: The Future of the Environment: Ecological Economics and Technological Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., et al.: 1996, ‘Renewable Resource Appropriation by Cities.’ in Costanza, R. et al.: 1996. Getting Down to Earth. Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin, G., Hammond, A., Raskin, P. and Swart, R.: 1997, Branch Points: Global Scenarios and Human Choice, PoleStar Series Report No.7, Stockholm Environment Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graszl, H.: 1996, Der Fussabdruck Feldbachs(The Footprint of Feldbach), Universität Graz, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A., Tian, H., Qi, Y., Pontius, G., Cornell, J. and Uhlig, J. 1995, Spatially Explicit Models of Land Use Change and Their Application to the Tropics, DOE Research Summary, CDIAC, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, P.: 1991. Persönliche Energie - und CO 2 -Bilanz. (Personal Energy and CO2 Balance). Second draft. Büro für Analyse und Ökologie, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J. and Ehrlich, P.: 1974. ‘Human Population and the Global Environment.’ American Scientist62, 282–292.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H.: 1997. The Carbon Crop. Science277, 883.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, J. Y., Hall, C. A. and L. G. L. Lemus: (this volume), ‘Resource Use Rates and Efficiency as Indicators of Regional Sustainability: An Examination of Five Countries’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krotscheck, C. and Narodoslawsky, M. 1996, “The Sustainable Process Index: A New Dimension in Ecological Evaluation”. Ecological Engineering, Vol. 6 p241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H., and Whittaker, R. (eds.): 1975 The Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., Meadows, D. and Randers, J.: 1992, Beyond the Limits. Chelsea Green Publishing Co., Post Mills, Vermont, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J. and Behrens, W.: 1972, Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, A. S., 1997, ‘Resurgent Forests can be Greenhouse Gas Sponges’, Science277, 315–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I.: 1994, Der ökologische Fussabdruck der Region Trier(The Ecological Footprint of the Trier Region), Diplomarbeit, Universität Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. and Cooperrider, A. Y.: 1994, Saving Nature’s Legacy-Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity, Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T.: 1994, Ecological and General Systems, revised edition. University of Colorado Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omemick, J. M.: 1987, ‘Ecoregions of the conterminous United States’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers77, 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Houser, J., Preiss, E., White, O., Fang, H., Mesnick, L., Barsky, T., Tariche, S., Schreck, J. and Alpert, S.: 1997. ‘Water Resources: Agriculture, the Environment, and Society’, BioScience47, 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S.: 1996, ‘Forging a Sustainable Water Strategy’, in Brown, L. et al.: 1996, State of the World, N.N. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E.: 1996. ‘Revisiting Carrying Capacity: Area-Based Indicators of Sustainability’, Population and Environment17, 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W. A.: 1995, Environmental Politics and Policy. CQ Press, Congressional Quarterly Inc. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek, F.: 1994, Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch: MIPS-das Mass für ökologisches Wirtschaften. (How Much Environment Do People Need? MIPS: The Measure for Managing Ecological Economies). Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston. English edition forthcoming: “The Fossil Makers”, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, J. L. and Le Quéré, C.: 1996, ‘Oceanic Carbon Dioxide Uptake in a Model of Century-Scale Global Warming’, Science274, 1346–1350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) annual. Human Development Report. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H. and Matson, P. A.: 1986. ‘Human Appropriation of the Products of Photosynthesis’, BioScience34, 368–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackemagel, M., Macintosh, J., Rees, W. E. and Willard, R.: 1993, How Big Is Our Ecological Footprint? A Handbook for Estimating a Community’s Appropriated Carrying Capacity. Draft. The UBC Task Force on Healthy and Sustainable Communities, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackemagel, M. and Rees, W. E.: 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackemagel, M., Onisto, L., Linares, A. C., Falfán, I. S. L., García, J. M., Guerrero, A. I. S., Guerrero, M. G. S.: 1997, Ecological Footprints of Nations: How Much Nature Do They Use? How Much Nature Do they Have?. Commissioned for the Rio+5 Forum. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Toronto. (available through ICLEI: iclei@iclei.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED: 1987, Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, (Gro Harlem Brundtland, chair), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H.: 1975. Communities and Ecosystems, MacMillan Publishing New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (WRI): 1994. World Resources1994–95. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (WRI): 1996. World Resources1996–97. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wackernagel, M., Yount, J.D. (1998). The Ecological Footprint: An Indicator of Progress toward Regional Sustainability. In: Sandhu, S., Jackson, L., Austin, K., Hyland, J., Melzian, B., Summers, K. (eds) Monitoring Ecological Condition at Regional Scales. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4976-1_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4976-1_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6089-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4976-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics