Skip to main content

A Framework for a Delaware Inland Bays Environmental Classification

  • Chapter

Abstract

Since Delaware’s coastal bays have been highly eutrophied for at least twenty years and Maryland’s coastal bays are not nutrient stressed, dominance of the fish community in Delaware’s coastal bays by Fundulus sp. may be an indicator of nutrient stress. Maryland’s coastal bays are menhaden, spot, and anchovy dominated. The dominance of Fundulus sp. in a nutrient-stressed system relates to the hardy nature of these fishes, especially in low-oxygen conditions. Submerged aquatic vegetation as seagrasses (SAV) has been absent from the highly nutrient-stressed Delaware coastal bays for about twenty-five years. In contrast, SAV is still found in Maryland’s coastal bays. The loss of SAV as a habitat for young fish may also be contributing to the apparent species shift in Delaware’s coastal bays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andres, A.S.:1992. Delaware Geological Survey Open File Report #35, 36 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, H.B., and W.C. Schroeder.: 1953. Fish Bull. Of Fish and Wildlife Ser., 53:577 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolen, C and W. Boynton. 1997. Report to Maryland Coastal Bays Program. University of Maryland. 71 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerco, C.F., B. Bunch, M.A. Cialone, and H. Wang.: 1994. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Technical Report EL-94–5. 246 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiber, F.C., and multiple authors: 1976. An Atlas of Delaware’s Wetlands and Estuarine Resources. Office of Coastal Zone Management, Technical Report 2. Dover, Delaware. 530 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, W.C., R.J. Orth, K.A. Moore, J.C. Stevenson, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P.W. Bergstrom, and R. Batiuk.: 1993. Bioscience43: 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derickson, W.K., and K.S. Price.: 1973. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.102 (3): 552–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deSylva, D.P., F.A. Kalber, Jr., and C.N. Schuster.: 1962. University of Delaware, Marine Laboratory, Information Series, Publ. No. 5. 164 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency.: 1996. EMAP.EPA/620/R-96/004. 78 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecay, P.A.: 1990. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware. Newark, Delaware. 179 pages

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinga, K.R., H. Jeon, and N.F. Lewis.: 1995. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program, DAS 4. 120 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, C.C., J. Casey, and S. Jordon.: 1996. A Report to Maryland Department of Natural Resources. 78 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, C.C. and K.S. Price.: 1996. Inland Bays Citizen Monitor. 5 (2): 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R.J., and K.L. Heck.: 1980. Estuaries3 (4): 278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R.J. and K.A. Moore.: 1988. A report to Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Dover, DE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R.J., J.F. Nowak, G.F. Anderson, K.P. Kiley, and J.R. Whiting.: 1992. Final Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, Maryland. 268 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R.J., J.F. Nowak, G.F. Anderson, and J.R. Whiting.: 1993. A Report for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, A.L., and G.C. Grant: 1965. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish. No. 504. 32 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, P.J.: 1995. Master’s Thesis. College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 101 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, L.L.: 1975. Masters Thesis. University of Delaware. 82 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, M. and K. Price.: 1996. Bot. Mar.39: 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, W.J., R.J. Geider, S.A. Welch, L.M. Graziano, and B. Overman.: 1993. Report to DNREC and Delaware’s Inland Bays Program. College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware. 43 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaas, P.A. and S.J. Jordan.: 1991. In. J.A. Mihursky and A. Chaney (eds.). New Perspectives on the Chesapeake System: a Research and Management Partnership. Chesapeake Research Consortium., Inc. CRC Publ. No. 137. Solomons, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Roy F., Inc.: 1993. Report to the Delaware Inland Bays National Estuary Program, DNREC., Dover,DE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Price, K.S. (1998). A Framework for a Delaware Inland Bays Environmental Classification. In: Sandhu, S., Jackson, L., Austin, K., Hyland, J., Melzian, B., Summers, K. (eds) Monitoring Ecological Condition at Regional Scales. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4976-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4976-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6089-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4976-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics