Advertisement

The early history and phylogeny of the chelicerates

  • J. A. Dunlop
  • P. A. Selden
Part of the The Systematics Association Special Volume Series book series (SASS, volume 55)

Abstract

Chelicerata is one of the major arthropod groups, characterized by a body divided into two tagmata, prosoma and opisthosoma, while the name Chelicerata refers to the chelicerae, the chelate first pair of appendages. Chelicerates comprise the arachnids (spiders, scorpions, mites, etc.), the extinct eurypterids (sea scorpions) and the xiphosurans (horseshoe crabs). Among Recent groups the limits of the Chelicerata are well defined, i.e. arachnids and xiphosurans, though the position of pycnogonids (sea spiders) remains uncertain (King, 1973). Phylogenetic relationships within the Chelicerata remain unresolved (Weygoldt and Paulus, 1979; van der Hammen, 1989; Shultz, 1990). When fossil taxa are considered, the limits of the Chelicerata become less well constrained. This is especially true of various problematic arthropods: fossils such as aglaspidids (Raasch, 1939), chasmataspids (Caster and Brooks, 1956), Sanctacaris Briggs and Collins, 1988 and other Burgess Shale-type arthropods (see Conway Morris, 1992 for a review).

Keywords

Sister Group Lower Cambrian Horseshoe Crab Lower Devonian Genal Spine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abele, L.G., Kim, W. and Felgenhauer, B.E. (1989) Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 6, 685–91.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D.T. (1973) Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L.I. and Selden P.A. (1997) Opisthosomal fusion and phylogeny of Palaeozoic Xiphosura. Lethaia, 30, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babcock, L.E. (1996) Early Cambrian chelicerate arthropod from China, in Sixth North American Paleontological Convention. Abstracts of Papers, (ed. J.E. Repetski), The Palaeontological Society, Special Publication No. 8, p. 17.Google Scholar
  5. Beall, B.S. and Labandeira, C.C. (1990) Macroevolutionary patterns of the Chelicerata and Tracheata, in Arthropod Paleobiology, Short Courses in Palaeontology, No. 3 (ed. S.J. Culver), The Palaeontological Society, pp. 257–84.Google Scholar
  6. Bekleminshev, V.N. (1944) Osnovy sraynitelinoi anatomii bespozvonochnykh (Fundamentals of the comparative anatomy of invertebrates), Sovetskaya nauka, 1st edition.Google Scholar
  7. Bergström, J. (1968) Eolimulus, a Lower Cambrian xiphosurid from Sweden. Geologiska Förenigens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 90, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergström, J. (1971) Paleomerus — merostome or merostomoid. Lethaia, 4, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergström, J. (1975) Functional morphology and evolution of xiphosurids. Fossils and Strata, 4, 291–305.Google Scholar
  10. Bergström, J. (1979) Morphology of fossil arthropods as a guide to phylogenetic relationships, in Arthropod Phylogeny (ed. A.P. Gupta), Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, pp. 3–56.Google Scholar
  11. Bergström, J., Stürmer, W. and Winter, G. (1980) Palaeoisopus, Palaeopantopus and Palaeothea, pycnogonid arthropods from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, West Germany. Paläontologishe Zeitschrift, 54, 7–54.Google Scholar
  12. Briggs, D.E.G. and Collins, D.A. (1988) A Middle Cambrian chelicerate from Mount Stephen, British Columbia. Palaeontology, 31, 779–98.Google Scholar
  13. Briggs, D.E.G. and Fortey, R.A. (1989) The early radiation and relationships of the major arthropod groups. Science, 246, 241–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Briggs, D.E.G., Bruton, D.L. and Whittington, H.B. (1979) Appendages of the arthropod Aglaspis spinifer (Upper Cambrian, Wisconsin) and their significance. Palaeontology, 22, 167–80.Google Scholar
  15. Briggs, D.E.G, Fortey, R.A. and Wills, M.A. (1992) Morphological disparity in the Cambrian. Science, 256, 1670–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bristowe, W.S. (1971) The World of Spiders, 2nd edn, Collins, London.Google Scholar
  17. Bruton, D.L. (1981) The arthropod Sidneya inexpectans, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B, 295, 619–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruton, D.L. and Whittington, H.B. (1983) Emeraldella and Leancholia, two arthropods from the Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B, 300, 553–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caster, K.E. and Brooks, H.K. (1956) New fossils from the Canadian-Chazyan (Ordovician) hiatus in Tennessee. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 36, 153–99.Google Scholar
  20. Caster, K.E. and Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N. (1964) Upper Ordovician eurypterids of Ohio. Palaeontographica Americana, 4, 301–58.Google Scholar
  21. Caster, K.E. and Macke, W.B. (1952) An aglaspid merostome from the Upper Ordovician of Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 26, 753–57.Google Scholar
  22. Chen, J.Y., Edgecombe, G.D., Ramsköld, L. and Zhou, G.Q. (1995) Head segmentation in early Cambrian Fuxianhuia: implications for arthropod evolution. Science, 268, 1339–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chlupač, I. (1965) Xiphosuran merostomes from the Bohemian Ordovician. Sbornúk Geologickych Ved Praha, Rada P, 5, 7–38.Google Scholar
  24. Chlupač, I. (1988) The enigmatic arthropod Duslia from the Ordovician of Czechoslovakia. Palaeontology, 31, 611–20.Google Scholar
  25. Chlupač, I. and Havlúcek, V. (1965) Kodymirus n. g., a new aglaspid merostome of the Cambrian of Bohemia. Sborník Geologickych Ved Praha, Rada P, 6, 7–20.Google Scholar
  26. Clarke, J.M. and Ruedemann, R. (1912) The Eurypterida of New York. Memoirs of the New York State Museum, Memoir 14.Google Scholar
  27. Conway Morris, S. (1992) Burgess Shale-type faunas in the context of the ‘Cambrian explosion’: a review. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 149, 631–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dahl, F. (1913) Vergleichende Physiologie und Morphologie der Spinnentiere, Theil I, Jena.Google Scholar
  29. Dubinin, V.B. (1962) Class Scorpionomorpha, in Fundamentals of Paleontology, Volume 9, Arthropoda, Tracheata, Chelicerata (ed. B.B. Rohdendorf), Osnovy paleontologii, 1991 English translation, Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Amerind Publishing Co., New Delhi, pp. 614–77.Google Scholar
  30. Eldredge, N. (1974) Revision of the suborder Synziphosurina (Chelicerata, Merostomata), with remarks on merostome phylogeny. American Museum Novitates, 2543, 1–41.Google Scholar
  31. Fedotov, D. (1925) On the relations between the Crustacea, Trilobita, Merostomata and Arachnida. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, (1924), 383–408.Google Scholar
  32. Firstman, B. (1973) The relationship of the chelicerate arterial system to the evolution of the endosternite. Journal of Arachnology, 1, 1–54.Google Scholar
  33. Flower, R. (1968) Merostomes from a Cotter horizon of the El Paso group. New Mexico State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir, 22 (4), 35–44.Google Scholar
  34. Grasshoff, M. (1978) A model of the evolution of the main chelicerate groups. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 42, 273–84.Google Scholar
  35. Hall, J. (1862) A new crustacean from the Potsdam Sandstone. Canadian Naturalist, 7, 443–5.Google Scholar
  36. Hammen, L. van der (1989) An Introduction to Comparative Arachnology, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  37. Handlirsch, A. (1914) Eine interessante Crustaceenform aus der Trias der Vogesen. Verhandlung der Kaiserlich Konlichen Zoologish—Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 64, 1–8.Google Scholar
  38. Hesselbo, S.P. (1989) The aglaspidid arthropod Beckwithia from the Cambrian of Utah and Wisconsin. Journal of Paleontology, 63, 636–42.Google Scholar
  39. Hesselbo, S.P. (1992) Aglaspidida (Arthropoda) from the Upper Cambrian of Wisconsin. Journal of Paleontology, 66, 885–923.Google Scholar
  40. Heymons, R. (1901) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Scolopender. Zoologica, 13(33), 2–5.Google Scholar
  41. Jeram, A.J. (1994) Scorpions from the Viséean of East Kirkton, West Lothian, Scotland, with a revision of the infraorder Mesoscorpionina. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 84, 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. King, P.E. (1973) Pycnogonids, Hutchinson and Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  43. Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N. (1986) A restudy of the fossil Scorpionida of the world. Palaeontographica Americana, 55, 1–287.Google Scholar
  44. Kraus, O. (1976) Zur phylogenetischen Stellung und Evolution der Chelicerata. Entomologica Germanica, 3, 1–12.Google Scholar
  45. Lankester, E.R. (1881) Limulus, an arachnid. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 23, 504–548.Google Scholar
  46. Lankester, E.R. (1881) Limulus, an arachnid. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 23, 609–49.Google Scholar
  47. Lauterbach, K.-E. (1980) Schlüsselerignisse in der Evolution des Grundplans der Arachnata (Arthropoda). Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 23, 163–327.Google Scholar
  48. Lindquist, E.E. (1984) Current theories on the evolution of major groups of Acari and their relationships with other groups of Arachnida, with consequent implications for their classification, in Acarology VI (eds D.A. Griffiths and C.E. Bowman), Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester, pp. 28–62.Google Scholar
  49. Lockwood, S. (1870) The horse foot crab. American Naturalist, 4(5), 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McNamara, K.J. and Trewin, N.H. (1993) A euthycarcinoid arthropod from the Silurian of Western Australia. Palaeontology, 36, 319–35.Google Scholar
  51. Möberg, J.C. (1892) Om en nyupptäckt fauna i blok af kambrisk sandsten insamlade af Dr N.O. Holst. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 14, 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nieszkowski, J. (1859) Der Eurypterus remipes aus den obersihurischen Schichten der Insel Oesel. Archiv für Naturkunde der Liv- Est- und Kurlands Series 1, 2, 299–344.Google Scholar
  53. Novojilov, N. (1962) Class Merostomata, in Fundamentals of Paleontology, Volume 9, Arthropoda, Tracheata, Chelicerata (ed. B.B. Rohdendorf), Osnovy paleontologii, 1991 English translation, Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Amerind Publishing Co., New Delhi, pp. 591–613.Google Scholar
  54. Petrunkevitch, A.I. (1949) A study of Palaeozoic Arachnida. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 37, 69–315.Google Scholar
  55. Pickett, J.W. (1993) A Late Devonian xiphosuran from near Parkes, New South Wales. Memoirs of the Association of Australian Palaeontologists, 15, 279–87.Google Scholar
  56. Pocock, R.I. (1893) On some points in the morphology of the Arachnida (s. s.) with notes on the classification of the group. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 61, 1–19.Google Scholar
  57. Pocock, R.I. (1901) The Scottish Silurian scorpion. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 44, 291–311.Google Scholar
  58. Raasch, G.O. (1939) Cambrian Merostomata, Special Papers of the Geological Society of America, No. 19.Google Scholar
  59. Raw, F. (1957) Origin of chelicerates. Journal of Paleontology, 31, 139–92.Google Scholar
  60. Richter, R., and Richter, G. (1929) Weinbergina opitzi n.g., n. sp., ein Schwerttrager (Merost. Xiphos.) aus dem Devon (Rheinland). Senckenbergiana, 11, 193–209.Google Scholar
  61. Riek, E.F. (1964) Merostomoidea (Arthropoda, Trilobitomorpha) from the Australian Middle Triassic. Records of the Australian Museum, 26, 327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Savory, T.H. (1971) Evolution in the Arachnida, Merrow Publishing Co., Watford.Google Scholar
  63. Selden, P.A. (1981) Functional morphology of the prosoma of Baltoeurypterus tetragonophthalamus (Fischer) (Chelicerata, Eurypterida). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 72, 9–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Selden, P.A. and Siveter, D.J. (1987) The origin of the limuloids. Lethaia, 20, 383–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Selden, P.A. and White, D.E. (1984) A new Silurian arthropod from Lesmahagow, Scotland. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 30, 43–9.Google Scholar
  66. Sharov.  A.G. (1966) Basic Arthropodan Stock with Special Reference to Insects, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  67. Shultz, J.W. (1990) Evolutionary morphology and phylogeny of Arachnida. Cladistics, 6, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simonetta, A. and Delle Cave, L. (1981) An essay in the comparative and evolutionary morphology of Palaeozoic arthropods. Atti dei Convengni Lincei, 49, 389–439.Google Scholar
  69. Sissom, W.D. (1990) Systematics, biogeography and paleontology, in The Biology of Scorpions (ed. G.A. Polis), Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 64–160.Google Scholar
  70. Starobogatov, Y.I. (1990) Sistema i filogeniya nizshikh khelitserovykh (analiz morfologii paleozoysikh grupp). (The systematics and phylogeny of the lower chelicerates (a morphological analysis of the Paleozoic groups)). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 1, 4–17 [English translation].Google Scholar
  71. Stockwell, S.A. (1989) Revision of the phylogeny and higher classification of scorpions (Chelicerata). PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley. Published by University Microfilms International, Ann Arbour, Michigan.Google Scholar
  72. Størmer, L. (1944) On the relationships and phylogeny of fossil and Recent Arachnomorpha. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske Videnskaps Academi i Oslo, I Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse 1944 I, 5, 1–158.Google Scholar
  73. Størmer, L. (1952) Phylogeny and taxonomy of fossil horseshoe crabs. Journal of Paleontology, 26, 630–40.Google Scholar
  74. Størmer, L. (1955) Merostomata, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part P, Arthropoda 2 (ed. R.C. Moore), Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 4–41.Google Scholar
  75. Størmer, L. (1959) Trilobitomorpha, in Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1 (ed. R.C. Moore), Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 22–37.Google Scholar
  76. Størmer, L. (1972) Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany, Part 2, Xiphosura. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 53, 1–29.Google Scholar
  77. Størmer, L. (1974) Arthropods from the Lower Devonian (Lower Emsian) of Alken an der Mosel, Germany. Part 4, Eurypterida, Drepanopteridae and other groups. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 54, 354–451.Google Scholar
  78. Stürmer, W. and Bergström, J. (1978) The arthropod Cheloniellon from the Devonian Hunsrück late. Paläontologiche Zeitschrift, 52, 57–81.Google Scholar
  79. Stürmer, W. and Bergström, J. (1981) Weinbergina, a xiphosuran from the Devonian Hunsrück late. Paläontologiche Zeitschrift, 55, 237–55.Google Scholar
  80. Tollerton, V.P. (1989) Morphology, taxonomy and classification of the Order Eurypterida Burmeister, 1843. Journal of Paleontology, 63, 642–57.Google Scholar
  81. Versluys, J. and Demoll, R. (1920) Die Vervandschaft der Merostomata mit den Arachnida und der anderen Abteilungen der Arthropoda. Proceedings Akademie Wetensschappen, Amsterdam, 23, 739–65.Google Scholar
  82. Walcott, C.D. (1912) Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Cambrian Geology and Palaeontology, II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57, 145–288.Google Scholar
  83. Waterston, C.D. (1979) Problems of the functional morphology and classification in stylonuroid eurypterids with observations on the Scottish Silurian Stylonuroidea. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 70, 251–322.Google Scholar
  84. Weygoldt, P. and Paulus, H.F. (1979) Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Taxonomie und Phylogeny der Chelicerata. Zeitschrift für Zoologie, Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 17, 85–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weygoldt, P. and Paulus, H.F. (1979) Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Taxonomie und Phylogeny der Chelicerata. Zeitschrift für Zoologie, Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 17, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wheeler, W.C., Cartwright, P. and Hayashi, C.Y. (1993) Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach. Cladistics, 9, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Whittington, H.B. (1981) Rare arthropods from the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B, 292, 329–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wills, M.A. (1996) Classification of the Arthropod Fuxianhuia. Science, 272, 746–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wills, M.A., Briggs, D.E.G. and Fortey, R.A. (1994) Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Paleobiology, 20, 93–130.Google Scholar
  90. Wills, M.A., Briggs, D.E.G., Fortey, R.A. and Wilkinson, M. (1995) The significance of fossils in understanding arthropod evolution. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 88, 203–15.Google Scholar
  91. Woods, H. (1909) The Crustacea and arachnids, in The Cambridge Natural History (eds S.F. Harmer and A.E. Shipley), Cambridge, pp. 283–94.Google Scholar
  92. Woodward, H. (1866–1878) Monograph of the British fossil Crustacea belonging to the order Merostomata. Palaeontographical Society, London.Google Scholar
  93. Youchong, H. and Shaowu, N. (1981) Discovery of new marine family-Sinaglaspidae (Aglaspida) in Shanxi Province. Kexue Tongbao, 26(10), 911–14.Google Scholar
  94. Zakhvatkin, A.A. (1952) Razdeleniye kleshchei (Acarina) na otryady i ikh polozheniye v sisteme Chelicerata (Division of ticks (Acarina) into orders and their position in the system of Chelicerata). Parazitologiya Sbornik Instut Zoologii Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 14, 5–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Dunlop
    • 1
  • P. A. Selden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations