Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Arthropod Relationships pp 189–209Cite as

A phylogeny of recent and fossil Crustacea derived from morphological characters

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The Systematics Association Special Volume Series ((SASS,volume 55))

Abstract

Crustaceans exhibit enormous diversity and morphological plasticity, having evolved many distinctive morphotypes with many heteronomous character combinations since their origination in the Cambrian (Schram, 1982; Briggs, 1992). The high level of parallelism, convergence and reversals amongst the crustaceans reflects that among the arthropods in general (Schram, 1978). Their morphological flexibility is largely due to the segmented nature of the body and serially homologous appendages, giving enormous opportunity for evolutionary specialization. Nevertheless, there are certain constraints within the Crustacea on what can be a viable, functioning arrangement of parts, and there is often a gross similarity of form and function in similar habitat types (e.g. mystacocarids, bathynellaceans and ingolfiellan amphipods in interstitial habitats).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abele, L.G., Spears, T., Kim, W. and Applegate, M. (1992) Phylogeny of selected maxillopodan and other crustacean taxa based on 18S ribosomal nucleotide sequences: a preliminary analysis. Acta Zoologica, 73, 373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adouette, A. and Philippe, H. (1993) The major lines of metazoan evolution, summary of traditional evidence and lessons from ribosomal RNA analysis, in Comparative Molecular Neurobiology (ed. Y. Pichon), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 1–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J.C. (1949) The systematic position of the crustacean genus Derocheilocaris and the status of the subclass Mystacocarida. American Museum Novitates, 1413, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averof, M. and Akam, M. (1995) Insect—crustacean relationships: insights from comparative developmental and molecular studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B, 347, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K.-H. (1975) Basipodella harpacticola n. gen., n. sp. Helg. wiss. Meers, 27, 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beklemischev, V. N. (1952) Osnovy sraviteljnoi anatomii bespozvonocnych. 2nd edn, Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beklemischev, V. N. (1969) Principles of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 1., Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, (translation of 3rd (1964) edn by J. M. MacLennan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, J. (1992) The oldest arthropods and the origin of the Crustacea. Acta Zoologica, 73, 287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, T.E. and Abele, L.G. (1982) Classification of the Recent Crustacea, in The Biology of Crustacea, Vol. 1. (ed. L.G. Abele), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxshall, G.A. and Huys, R. (1989) New tantulocarid, Stygotantulus stocki, parasitic on harpacticoid copepods, with an analysis of the phylogenetic relationships within the Maxillopoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 9, 126–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxshall, G.A. and Lincoln, R.J. (1983) Tantulocarida, a new class of Crustacea ectoparasitic on other crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 3, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxshall, G.A. and Lincoln, R.J. (1987) The life cycle of the Tantulocarida (Crustacea). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 315, 267–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, J.M. and Hewitt, G.C. (1980) A new maxillopodan crustacean, parasitic on a myodocopid ostracod. Crustaceana, 38, 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D.E.G. (1978) The morphology, mode of life, and affinities of Canadaspis perfecta (Crustacea: Phyllocarida), Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 281, 439–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D.E.G. (1981) The arthropod Odaraia alata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 291, 541–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D.E.G. (1992) Phylogenetic significance of the Burgess Shale crustacean Canadaspis. Acta Zoologica, 73, 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D.E.G., Fortey, R.A. and Wills, M.A. (1992) Morphological disparity in the Cambrian. Science, 256, 1670–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D.E.G., Fortey, R.A. and Wills, M.A. (1993) How big was the Cambrian explosion? A taxonomic and morphologic comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods, in Evolutionary Patterns and Processes (eds D.R. Lees and D. Edwards), Linnean Society Symposium Series, Linnean Society of London, pp. 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, H.K. (1955) A crustacean from the Tesnus Formation of Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 29, 852–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusca, R.C and Brusca, G.J. 1990. Invertebrates, Sinauer, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calman, W.T. (1904) On the classification of the Crustacea Malacostraca. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7, 144–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calman, W.T. (1909) Crustacea, in Treatise on Zoology VII, Appendiculata, Fascicule 3 (ed. R. Lankester), Adam & Black, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G.H. (1906) Notes on the segmentation and phylogeny of the Arthropoda, with an account of the maxillae in Polyxenus lagurus. Quarterly Journal of the Microscopical Society, 49, 469–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisne, J.L. (1982) Origin of the Crustacea, in The Biology of the Crustacea, Vol. 1. Systematics, the Fossil Record and Biogeography (ed. L.G. Abele), Academic Press, New York, pp. 65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claus, C. (1876) Untersuchungen zur Erforschung der genealogischen Grundlage des Crustaceensystems, Carl Gerold’s Sohn, Wien.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Claus, C. (1888) Uber den Organismus der Nebaliden und die systematische Stellung der Leptostraken. Arbeiteten aus dem Zoologischen Institut der Universität Wien, 6, 1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costlow, J.D. Jr and Bookhout, C.G. (1957) Larval development of Balanus eburneus in the laboratory. Biological Bulletin, 112, 313–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costlow, J.D. Jr and Bookhout, C.G. (1958) Larval development of Balanus amphitrite var. denticulata Broch reared in the laboratory. Biological Bulletin, 114, 284–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1952) Mystacocarida. Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–49. Lund University Arssk, 48, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1956) Some crustacean relationships, in Bertil Hanstrom, Zoological Papers in Honour of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, November 20th, 1956 (ed. K. Wingstrand) Lund Zoological Institute, Lund, Sweden, pp. 138–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1963) Main evolutionary lines among recent Crustacea, in Phylogeny and Evolution of Crustacea (eds H.B. Whittington and W.D.I. Rolfe), Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1976) Structural plans as functional models exemplified by the Crustacea Malacostraca. Zoologica Scripta, 5, 163–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1983) Phylogenese systematics and the Crustacea Malacostraca — a problem of prerequisites. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 26, 355–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1984) The subclass Phyllocarida (Crustacea) and the status of some early fossils; a neontologist’s view. Videnskabelige Meddeleser fra Dansk naturhistorisk Forening, 145, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1991) Crustacea Phyllopoda and Malacostraca, a reappraisal of cephalic dorsal shield and fold systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 334, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E. (1992) Aspects of malacostracan evolution. Acta Zoologica, 73, 339–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M.J. and Schram, F.R. (1990) The origin of crustacean biramous appendages and the evolution of Arthropoda. Science, 250, 667–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, F.D. (1988) Developmental patterns in numbers of ramal segments of copepod post-maxillipedal legs. Crustaceana, 54, 256–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G. (1992) The origin of the Crustacea. Acta Zoologica, 73, 273–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesebrecht, W. (1913) Crustacea, in Handbuch der Morphologie der Wierbellosen Tiere, Arthropoden 4 (ed. A. Lang), Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. 9–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobben, K. (1893) A contribution to the knowledge of the genealogy and classification of the Crustacea. Annual Magazine of Natural History, 11, 440–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobben, K. (1919) Uber die muskulatur des vorderkopfes der stomatopoden und die systematische stellung dieser malakostrakengruppe. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichten Academie der Wissenschaften in Wien, 128, 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygier, M.J. (1983) Ascothoracida and the unity of the Maxillopoda. Crustacean Issues, 1, 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygier, M.J. (1985) Comparative morphology and ontogeny of the Ascothoracida, a step towards phylogeny of the Maxillopoda. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 2466B–7B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygier, M.J. (1987) Nauplii, antennular ontogeny, and the position of the Ascothoracida within the Maxillopoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 1, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1896) Systematische Phylogenie der Wirbellose Tiere 2, George Reimer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. J. (1893) Zur morphologie der Gliedmassen und Mundtheile der Crustaceen und Insecten. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 16, 193–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, D.L. and Presch, W. (1991) The effect of ordered characters on phylogenetic reconstruction. Cladistics, 1, 243–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, K.L. (1928) Critical notes on some Cambrian arthropods described by Charles D. Walcott. Videnskabelige Meddeleser fra Dansk naturhistorisk Forening, 86, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1964) The Cephalocarida comparative skeletomusculature. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 16, 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1971) Biology of the Mystacocarida, A prospectus. Smithsonian Contributions in Zoology, 76, 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1982) The structural morphology of walking mechanisms in eumalacostracan crustaceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 296, 245–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1983) A defense of the caridoid facies, wherein the early evolution of the Malacostraca is discussed, in Crustacean Issues, Vol. 1, Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F.R. Schram), Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 145–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. (1992) Reflections on the phylogenetic position of the Cephalocarida. Acta Zoologica, 73, 315–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R. and Newman, W.A. (1975) A trilobitomorph origin for the Crustacea. Fossils and Strata, 4, 437–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R.R., Marcotte, B.M., Newman, W.A. and Maddocks, R.F. (1982) Evolution within the Crustacea, in Biology of Crustacea (ed. L.G. Abele), Academic Press, New York, pp. 150–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, T. (1989) Origin of the limb basis in copepod limbs, with reference to remipedian and cephalocarid limbs. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 9, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, S.M. (1934) On the embryology of Nebalia bipes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B, 223, 168–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metschnikov, E. (1868) The history of the development of Nebalia. Zapiski Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk, St. Petersburg, 13, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R.C. (1959) (ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1, Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K.J. (1983) Crustacea with preserved soft parts from the Upper Cambrian of Sweden. Lethaia, 16, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K.J. (1985) Skaracarida, a new order of Crustacea from the Upper Cambrian of Västergötland. Fossils and Strata, 17, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K.J. and Walossek, D. (1986) Martinssonia elongata. gen. et sp.n., a crustacean-like euarthropod from the Upper Cambrian ‘Orsten’ of Sweden. Zoologica Scripta, 15, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K.J. and Walossek, D. (1988) External morphology and larval development of the Upper Cambrian maxillopod Bredocaris admirabilis. Fossils and Strata, 23, 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W.A. (1983) Origin of the Maxillopoda; urmalacostracan ontogeny and progenesis, in Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F.R. Schram), Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 105–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W.A., Zullo, V.A. and Withers, T.H. (1969) Cirripedia, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology Part R, Arthropoda, Vol. 4 (ed. R.C. Moore), Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. R206–R295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K.C. and Davis, J.I. (1991) Polymorphic taxa, missing entries and cladistic analysis. Cladistics, 7, 233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novozhilov, N.I. (1960) Podklass Pseudocrustacea, in Osnovy Paleontologii, Arthropoda. Trilobitomorpha and Crustacea (ed. Yu.A. Orlov), Nedra, Moscow, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, R.A. and Riggins, R. (1987) The nature of cladistic data. Cladistics, 3, 201–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platnick, N.I., Griswold, C.E. and Coddington, J.A. (1991) On missing entries in cladistic analysis. Cladistics, 7, 337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, P.E. (1920) The appendages, anatomy and relationships of Trilobites. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 7, 1–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, P.E. (1935) Leanchoilia and other Mid-Cambrian Arthropoda. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard, 76, 205–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, W.D.I. (1969) Phyllocarida, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology Part R, Arthropoda, Vol. 4 (ed. R.C. Moore), Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. R296–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H.L. (1955) The Cephalocarida, a new subclass of Crustacea from Long Island Sound. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 41, 61–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H.L. (1963a) The Cephalocarida, functional morphology, larval development, comparative external anatomy. Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 15, 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H.L. (1963b) Significance of the Cephalocarida, in Phylogeny and Evolution of Crustacea (eds H.B. Whittington and W.D.I. Rolfe), Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 163–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G.O. (1887) Report of the Phyllocarida collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Challenger Report, Zoology, 19, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1969a) Polyphyly in the Eumalacostraca? Crustaceana, 16, 243–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1969b) Some Middle Pennsylvanian Hoplocarida and their phylogenetic significance. Fieldiana Geology, 12, 235–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1978) Arthropods, a convergent phenomenon. Fieldiana Geology, 39, 61–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1981) On the classification of Eumalacostraca. Journal of Paleontology, 55, 126–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1982) The fossil record and evolution of the Crustacea, in Biology of Crustacea (ed. L.G. Abele), Academic Press, New York, pp. 93–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1983) Remipedia and crustacean phylogeny, in Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F.R. Schram), Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 23–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1984) Relationships within the eumalacostracan Crustacea. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 20, 301–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. (1986) Crustacea, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. and Emerson, M.J. (1986) The great Tesnus fossil expedition of 1985. Environment Southwest, 515, 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, F.R. and Emerson, M.J. (1991) Arthropod Pattern Theory, A new approach to arthropod phylogeny. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 31, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scourfield, D.J. (1926) On a new type of crustacean from the Old Red Sandstone — Lepidocaris rhyniensis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B, 214, 153–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serban, E. (1972) Bathynella (Podophallocarida Bathynellacea). Travaux de l’Institut de Spéologie ‘Emile Racovitza’, 11, 11–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, A.G. (1966) Basic Arthropodan Stock, Pergamon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewing, R. (1958) Untersuchungen zur Morphologie der Malacostraca. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie, 75, 39–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewing, R. (1960) Neuere Ergebnisse der Verwandtschaftsforschung bei den Crustaceen. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Rostock, Reihe. Mathematik-Naturwissenschaften, 9, 343–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siewing, R. (1963) Studies in Malacostracan morphology, Results and problems, in Phylogeny and Evolution of Crustacea (eds H.B. Whittington and W.D.I. Rolfe), Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonetta, A.M. and Delle Cave, L. (1975) The Cambrian non trilobite arthropods from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia. A study of their comparative morphology, taxonomy and evolutionary significance. Palaeontographica Italica, 69, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, T., Abele, L.G. and Applegate, M.A. (1994) Phylogenetic study of cirripedes and selected relatives (thecostraca) based on 18S rDNA sequence-analysis. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 14, 641–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Størmer, L. (1944) On the relationships and phylogeny of fossil and Recent Arachnomorpha. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske Vidensk Academi i Oslo, 5, 1–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Størmer, L. (1959) Chelicerata, Merostomata, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part P, Arthropoda 2 (ed. R.C. Moore), Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbings, H.G. (1975) Balanus balanoides. L.M.B.C. Memoirs on Typical British Marine Plants and Animals, 37, 70–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D.L. (1990) PAUP, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.0. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G.M. (1894) On a freshwater schizopod from Tasmania. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 6, 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiegs, O.W. and Manton, S.M. (1958) The evolution of the Arthropoda. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 33, 255–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, C.D. (1912) Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Cambrian geology and paleontology, II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57, 109–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, L.J. (1969) Studies on the larval structure and metamorphosis of Balanus balanoides. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 256, 237–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walossek, D. (1993) The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of the Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Fossils and Strata, 32, 1–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walossek, D. and Müller, K. J. (1990) Upper Cambrian stem lineage crustaceans and their bearing upon the monophyly of Crustacea and the position of Agnostus. Lethaia, 23, 409–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watling, L. (1983) Peracaridan disunity and its bearing on eumalacostracan phylogeny with a redefinition of eumalacostracan superorders, in Crustacean Issues, Vol. 1, Crustacean Phylogeny (ed. F.R. Schram), Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 213–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W., Cartwright, P. and Hayashi, C. Y. (1993) Arthropod phylogeny, a combined approach. Cladistics, 9, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, M.A., Briggs, D.E.G. and Fortey, R.A. (1994) Disparity as an evolutionary index. A comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods. Paleobiology, 20, 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, M.A., Briggs, D.E.G., Fortey, R.A. and Wilkinson, M. (1995) The significance of fossils in understanding arthropod evolution. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 57, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, M.A., Briggs, D.E.G., Fortey, R.A., Wilkinson, M. and Sneath, P.H.A. (1997) An arthropod phylogeny based on fossil and Recent taxa, in Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny (ed. G.E. Edgecombe), Columbia University Press, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.D.F. (1992) Computerized analysis of crustacean relationships. Acta Zoologica, 73, 383–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, J. (1981) Remipedia. A new class of Crustacea from a marine cave in the Bahamas. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 1, 328–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, C. (1926–27) Crustacea = Krebse Allgemeine Einleitung in die Naturgeschichte der Crustacea, in Handbuch der Zoologie, Vol. III, No. 1 (eds W. Kukenthal and T. Krumbach), de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology, Wills Memorial Building, University of Bristol, Queen’s Road, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK

    M. A. Wills

Authors
  1. M. A. Wills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, London, UK

    R. A. Fortey

  2. Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, London, UK

    R. H. Thomas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wills, M.A. (1998). A phylogeny of recent and fossil Crustacea derived from morphological characters. In: Fortey, R.A., Thomas, R.H. (eds) Arthropod Relationships. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series, vol 55. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4904-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4904-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6057-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4904-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation