Summary
For hybrid wheat to be accepted in the Great Plains of the USA, hybrids must exhibit enhanced yield performance, yield responsiveness, and reasonable yield stability across a wide array of production environments. Agripro has been researching hybrid wheat since 1981 and has an established pureline release history since 1978. Yield data from 1991 to 1995 were examined to compare the trend performance and selection gains of purelines and hybrids in a large scale parallel development effort. This data set (13,739 points) reveals an average 0.454 t ha−1 or 10.8% hybrid yield advantage over purelines in preliminary regional testing. Entries selected from the preliminary trials show a greater hybrid advantage of 0.652 t ha−1, or 13.5%. Several factors including enhanced stability over strong yearly environmental effects, improved agronomic and epidemiological expression through complementary inbred trait selection, and improved heat tolerance are likely contributors to this significantly improved selection gain. Yield stability of hybrids and purelines was compared in Agripro Standard Variety Trials and USDA-ARS Southern Regional Performance Nurseries from 1990 to 1995. In addition to having higher means than purelines, hybrid yield advantage increased with improving production conditions. The enhanced responsiveness of hybrids, as indicated by higher slopes in regression analyses, was combined with similar deviations from regression response. Hybrid wheat in the Great Plains of the USA has shown a fundamental yield, responsiveness and selection gain advantage over pureline varieties that could result in acceptance by producers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carver, B.F., E.L. Smith & H.O. England, Jr., 1987. Regression and cluster analysis of environmental responses of hybrid and pureline winter wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 27: 659–664.
Eberhart, S.A. & W.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Agronomy J 6: 36–40.
Mock, J.J., 1995. A new look at hybrid wheat and its role in improving yield and quality. In: C.J. Peterson (Ed.), Proceedings of the North American Wheat Workers Workshop, 1994, pp. 20–34. National Wheat Improvement Committee. Kansas City.
SAS Institute, 1982. SAS user’s guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Van Meeteren, N.D, 1995. Hybrid and pureline response to high temperature stress at two growth stages in hard red winter wheat. Agronomy Abstracts 87: 80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bruns, R., Peterson, C.J. (1997). Yield and stability factors associated with hybrid wheat. In: Braun, HJ., Altay, F., Kronstad, W.E., Beniwal, S.P.S., McNab, A. (eds) Wheat: Prospects for Global Improvement. Developments in Plant Breeding, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4896-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4896-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6053-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4896-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive