Skip to main content

Abstract

A lot of attention has recently been devoted to the concept of sustainable development or sustainable growth.’ This is usually defined as development “that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED, 1987, p. 43). Operationally it can be interpreted as: given a certain rate of time preference “a sustainable economy is… one that provides the maximum level of social welfare over an infinite horizon maintaining both the optimal reproducible capital stock and the optimal stock of regenerable environmental stock” (Musu, 1991, p. 3). Consequently, sustainable development reduces to a constrained maximization of a social welfare function and “control theory… (is the technique used) to examine sustainability in the context of renewables and non-renewables resources” (Pezzey, 1989, p. vi).2

The author would like to thank A. Beltratti, D. Siniscalco and A. Vercelli for their comments on an earlier draft of this work. Any remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the author. Financial support from the Fondazione EM Enrico Maffei is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K. J. and L. Hurwicz (1972). “Optimality Criterion for Decision-Making under Ignorance”, in Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics: Essays in Honor of G. L. S. Shackle, C. F. Carter and J. L. Ford (eds.), Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett, W. A. (1981). Consumer Demand and Labor Supply: Goods,Monetary Assets and 71’me, Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanchard, O. J. and S. Fisher (1989).Lectures on Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broome, J. (1992). Counting the Cost of Global Warming,London, White Horse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cline, W. R. (1991). “Scientific Basis for the Greenhouse Effect”, The Economic Journal 101, 904–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cline, W. R. (1992). The Economics of Global Warming, Washington, D.C. Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cropper, M. L. and W. E. Oates (1992). “Environmental Economics: A Survey”,Journal of Economic Literature XXX, 675–740.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer (1980). Economics and Consumer Behavior, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Heal, G. M. (1993). “The Optimal Use of Exhaustible Resources”, in Handbook of Natural Resources and Energy Economics, Vol. III, A. V. Kneese and J. L. Sweeney (eds.), Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp. 855–880.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hooper, J. W. and A. Zellner (1961). “The Error Forecast for Multivariate Regression Models”, Econometrica 29, 544–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Intriligator, M. D. (1971). Mathematical Optimization and Economic Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marini, G. and P. Scaramozzino (1993). “Environmental Externalities, Disconnected Generations and Policy”, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mood, A. M., F. A. Graybill and D. C. Boes (1974). Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 3rd ed., New York, McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Musu, I. (1991). “Sustainable Growth and Time Preference”, Università di Venezia, D.P. No. 91.08.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nordhaus, W. D. (1994). Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pezzey, J. (1989). “Economic Analysis of Sustainable Growth and Sustainable Development”, Environment Department, Working Paper No. 15, The World Bank Policy Planning and Research Staff, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tucci, M. P. (1992). “Sustainable Growth: A Stochastic Approach”, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Via S. Sofia 27, 20122 Milano, Italy, Nota di Lavoro 10.92.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vercelli, A. (1994). “Hard Uncertainty and the Environment”, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Via S. Sofia 27, 20122 Milano, Italy, Nota di Lavoro 46.94.

    Google Scholar 

  19. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Graciela Chichilnisky Geoffrey Heal Alessandro Vercelli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tucci, M.P. (1998). Stochastic Sustainability. In: Chichilnisky, G., Heal, G., Vercelli, A. (eds) Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4892-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4892-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6051-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4892-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics