Skip to main content

How Students Learn from Ambulatory Preceptors: Critical Incidents

  • Chapter
Advances in Medical Education
  • 34 Accesses

Summary

This study explores the medical student’s perspective on learning in the community-based preceptor setting. Method: A critical incident narrative was collected from each fourth year student enrolled in the family medicine clerkship. A multidisciplinary team of medical educators analysed and coded the narratives. Results: Critical learning events had definitive outcomes, were problem-focused and lead the student to self-reflection. ‘Active observation’ (71%) was the most frequent mode of learning. ‘Collaboration’ and ‘coaching’ (30% and 14%) were also important. Conclusions: This study expands the idea of active learning to include observation focused by the students’s recognition of an important learning need. The study also suggests that critical learning moments are generally brief Increasing preceptor sensitivity to these results can enhance their teaching effectiveness without compromising practice efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Branch W, Pels RJ, Lawrence RS, Arky R. Becoming a doctor. Critical-incident reports from third-year medical students. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;329(15):1130–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diamond MR, Kamien M, Sim MGB, Davis J. A critical incident study of general practice trainees in their basic general practice term. Medical Journal of Australia 1995;162(6):321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goertzen J, Stewart M, Weston W. Effective teaching behaviors of rural family medicine preceptors. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995;153(2):161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Metcalfe DH, Mathara M. Students’ perception of good and bad teaching: report of a critical incident study. Medical Education 1995;29(3):193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parker DL, Webb J, D’ Souza D. The value of critical incident analysis as an educational tool and its relationship to experiential learning. Nurse Education Today 1995;15(2):111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Price DA, Miflin BM, Mudge PR, Jackson CL. The quality of medical teaching and learning in rural settings: the learner’s perspective. Medical Education 1994;28:239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenal L. Exploring the learner’s world: critical incident methodology. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 1995;26(3):115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Swee DE. Teaching Family Medicine in Medical School. Kansas City, Missouri: The Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brookfield S. Using critical incidents to explore learner’s assumptions. In: Mezirow J, editor. Fostering Critical Thinking in Adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990:177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brookfield SD. The skilful teacher. On technique, trust and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn WR, Hamilton DD. The critical incident technique. A brief guide. Medical Teacher 1986;8(3):207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Flanagan JC. The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin 1954:51:327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Primary Care Research In Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Epstein, R.M., Cole, D., Gawinski, B., Ruddy, N., Lee, S. (1997). How Students Learn from Ambulatory Preceptors: Critical Incidents. In: Scherpbier, A.J.J.A., van der Vleuten, C.P.M., Rethans, J.J., van der Steeg, A.F.W. (eds) Advances in Medical Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_81

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6048-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4886-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics