Summary
This study explores the medical student’s perspective on learning in the community-based preceptor setting. Method: A critical incident narrative was collected from each fourth year student enrolled in the family medicine clerkship. A multidisciplinary team of medical educators analysed and coded the narratives. Results: Critical learning events had definitive outcomes, were problem-focused and lead the student to self-reflection. ‘Active observation’ (71%) was the most frequent mode of learning. ‘Collaboration’ and ‘coaching’ (30% and 14%) were also important. Conclusions: This study expands the idea of active learning to include observation focused by the students’s recognition of an important learning need. The study also suggests that critical learning moments are generally brief Increasing preceptor sensitivity to these results can enhance their teaching effectiveness without compromising practice efficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Branch W, Pels RJ, Lawrence RS, Arky R. Becoming a doctor. Critical-incident reports from third-year medical students. New England Journal of Medicine 1993;329(15):1130–1132.
Diamond MR, Kamien M, Sim MGB, Davis J. A critical incident study of general practice trainees in their basic general practice term. Medical Journal of Australia 1995;162(6):321–324.
Goertzen J, Stewart M, Weston W. Effective teaching behaviors of rural family medicine preceptors. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995;153(2):161–168.
Metcalfe DH, Mathara M. Students’ perception of good and bad teaching: report of a critical incident study. Medical Education 1995;29(3):193–197.
Parker DL, Webb J, D’ Souza D. The value of critical incident analysis as an educational tool and its relationship to experiential learning. Nurse Education Today 1995;15(2):111–116.
Price DA, Miflin BM, Mudge PR, Jackson CL. The quality of medical teaching and learning in rural settings: the learner’s perspective. Medical Education 1994;28:239–251.
Rosenal L. Exploring the learner’s world: critical incident methodology. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 1995;26(3):115–118.
Swee DE. Teaching Family Medicine in Medical School. Kansas City, Missouri: The Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, 1991.
Brookfield S. Using critical incidents to explore learner’s assumptions. In: Mezirow J, editor. Fostering Critical Thinking in Adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990:177–193.
Brookfield SD. The skilful teacher. On technique, trust and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
Dunn WR, Hamilton DD. The critical incident technique. A brief guide. Medical Teacher 1986;8(3):207–215.
Flanagan JC. The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin 1954:51:327–358.
Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Primary Care Research In Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Epstein, R.M., Cole, D., Gawinski, B., Ruddy, N., Lee, S. (1997). How Students Learn from Ambulatory Preceptors: Critical Incidents. In: Scherpbier, A.J.J.A., van der Vleuten, C.P.M., Rethans, J.J., van der Steeg, A.F.W. (eds) Advances in Medical Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_81
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_81
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6048-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4886-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive