Summary
This paper describes the fundamental restructuring of an academic medical center’s consultative process. The objectives include broadening generalists’ skills while using specialists in a targeted manner. Specialty care training traditionally focuses on the management of complex inpatient problems; outpatient services are regarded as an adjunct to inpatient management. The tempo and scope of specialty care does not integrate easily with service delivery in primary care settings. When generalists have a question they may: 1) try to find a specialist (often time consuming), 2) write a consult to the specialty clinic (inefficient for patients/loses teachable moment for generalist), or 3) attempt to manage the problem without specialty input (potentially resulting in extensive, unfocused or incomplete evaluations). We have shifted the specialty consult paradigm to value the outpatient consult above all other stable patients. Specialists developed service specific preconsult management strategies for routine specialty questions that frequently generate referrals. For clinical questions not covered by these strategies, consultants will evaluate the case over the phone or provide a brief consult with the patient and generalist during the outpatient clinic session. These real-time specialty consults maximize generalist learning through education around clinical issues relevant to generalist practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hart J, Kahan E, Deranze E. Consultants’ perception of quality of referrals. Isr J Med Sci 1991;27:405–407.
Aiken LH, Lewis CE, Craig J et al. The contribution of specialists to the delivery of primary care. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1363–1370.
Kravitz RL, Greenfield S. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Annu Rev Public Health 1995;16:431–435.
Hnatiuk O, Moores L, Loughney T, Torrington K. Evaluations of Internists’ Spirometric Interpretations. JGIM 1996;11:204–208.
Dawson NV, Arkes HR. Systematic errors in medical decision making: judgement limitations. J Gen Intern Med 1987;2:183–187.
Greibe J, Bugge P, Gjørup T, Lauritzen T, Bonnevie O, Wulff HR. Long term prognosis of duodenal ulcer: follow-up study and survey of doctors’ estimates. Br Med J 1977;2:1572–1574.
Williams, PT, Peet G. Differences in the value of clinical information: Referring physician versus consulting specialists. J Am Board FamPract 1994;7:292–302.
Chernof BA, Guterman JJ, Heckman M, Esquivel M, Hilborne L, Hodgson C. Managing access to specialty consultation: An organizational needs assessment [abstract]. JGIM 1996;11(1):66.
Fronstin P. The effectiveness of health care cost management strategies: A review of the evidence. ERBI Issue Brief 1994;154:1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chernof, B.A., Guterman, J.J., Heckman, M., Esquivel, M., Hodgson, C.S. (1997). Re-engineering the Specialty Consult Paradigm: Extending the Generalist and Maximizing the Specialist Through Educational Reform. In: Scherpbier, A.J.J.A., van der Vleuten, C.P.M., Rethans, J.J., van der Steeg, A.F.W. (eds) Advances in Medical Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_60
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6048-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4886-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive