Summary
Key feature-based exams focus on clinicians’ ability to make decisions about critical steps in the identification and management of clinical problems. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent to which these key decisions are maintained or enhanced from graduation into practice. A booklet containing 18 clinical problems testing 44 key features (KFs) was administered to 98 graduating students and 21 volunteer general practitioners who were three to five years into practice. Students and experienced physicians had similar mean scores (t-tests, p>.05) for 36 of the 44 KFs (82%). Physicians scored significantly higher (+25%, p<.05) on three KFs, two related to treatment and one to investigation. The physicians scored significantly lower (-28.4%, p<.05) on two history related KFs, two physical exam KFs, and one investigation KF. The results from this exploratory study suggest that experience did not have a big effect on key decision-making skills, with experienced physicians showing slightly enhanced management decisions and some lessened skills for data acquisition. A content analysis of these latter items revealed that the experienced physicians were not failing to meet the scoring criteria by taking shortcuts (e.g., only supplying 2 out of 3 keyed responses). Instead, they were considering different leading diagnoses (the “wrong ballpark”). For example, they did not order a lower GI investigation in an elderly person, thus failing to consider GI bleeding as a possible etiology, a condition that is imminently treatable. One possible explanation for the shrinking differential diagnosis may be the low incidence of certain diagnoses in practice; out of sight, out of mind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bordage G, Page G. An alternative approach to PMPs: The “key features” concept. In: Hart IR, Harden RM, editors. Further Developments in Assessing Clinical Competence, Montréal: Can-Heal Publications, 1987; 59–75.
Page G, Bordage G. The Medical Council of Canada’s key feature project: A more valid written examination of clinical decisionmaking skills. Academic Medicine 1995;70:104–110.
Page G, Bordage G, Allen T. Developing key feature problems and examinations to assess clinical decision-making skills. Academic Medicine 1995;70:194–201.
Bordage G, Brailovsky C, Carretier H, Page G. Content validation of key features on a national examination of clinical decisionmaking skills. Academic Medicine 1995;70:276–281.
Marquis Y, Chaoulli, J, Bordage G, Chabot JM, Leclêre H. Patientmanagement problems as a learning tool for the continuing medical education of general practitioners. Medical Education 1984; 18:117–124.
Bordage, G. Where are the history and physical? Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995;152:1595–1598.
Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: A key to successful diagnostic thinking. Academic Medicine 1995;69:883–885.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bordage, G., Brailovsky, C.A., Cohen, T., Page, G. (1997). Maintaining and Enhancing Key Decision-Making Skills from Graduation into Practice: An Exploratory Study. In: Scherpbier, A.J.J.A., van der Vleuten, C.P.M., Rethans, J.J., van der Steeg, A.F.W. (eds) Advances in Medical Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4886-3_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6048-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4886-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive