Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 62))

Abstract

Even economists find Economic Man—the perfectly rational decision maker of our theories—a humorous character. We all know that in real life people make irrational decisions for all sorts of reasons—because they cannot figure out what they want, because they cannot be bothered to look for the right answer, or because they want to be the same as (or different from) other people. The economist who truly believes in individual rationality is as much a fiction as homo economicus himself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dennett, Daniel. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, Stanley Fischer and Paul Samuelson. 1977. “Comparative Advantage, Trade and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods”, American Economic Review 67(December):823–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter. 1997. “The Global Economy and the Nation-state”, Foreign Affairs 76(Sept/Oct):159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, William. 1964. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior”, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Stuart. 1993. The Origins of Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, Robert. 1996. “There’s Nothing ‘Natural’ about 5% Unemployment”, Business Week November 4, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G. 1985. “Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: a Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 100(May):529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1989. Evolutionary Genetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. 1944. “Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money”, Econometrica 12(January):45–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. 1967. “The New Industrial State: Rejoinder”, The Public Interest 9(Fall):118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. and Sweeney, R. 1977. “Monetary Theory and the Great Capitol Hill Baby-sitting Coop Crisis” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 9(1)(February):86--89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection,Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krugman, P. (1998). Rationales for Rationality. In: Dennis, K. (eds) Rationality in Economics: Alternative Perspectives. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4862-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4862-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6037-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4862-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics