Skip to main content

Malmquist Productivity Indexes: An Empirical Comparison

  • Chapter
Index Numbers: Essays in Honour of Sten Malmquist

Abstract

The interest in empirical applications of the Malmquist productivity index, proposed by Caves et al. (1982) (CCD), took off after Färe et al. (1994a) (originally circulated as a working paper in 1989) showed the relative ease with which the index could be calculated in the case of piecewise linear frontiers. The additional attraction added by Färe et al. (1994a) was to maintain inefficient operations (accommodated initially in the CCD definition, but then ruled out by assumption). Moreover, they decomposed productivity change into efficiency improvement and frontier shift in the general case of multiple outputs and inputs, generalizing the parametric single output approach in Nishimizu and Page (1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balk, B.M. (1993) “Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher Ideal indexes: comment,” Economic Journal 103, 680–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjurek, H. (1994) “Essays on efficiency and productivity change with applications to public service production,” Ekonomiska Studier 52, Department of economics, Göteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjurek, H. (1996) “The Malmquist total factor productivity index,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98(2), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert (1982) “The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity,” Econometrica, 50, 1393–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and J.A. Swanson (1981) “Productivity growth, scale economies, and capacity utilization in U.S. railroads, 1955–74,” American Economic Review, 71, 994–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M., M. Fuss and L. Waverman (1981) “The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries, with an Application to Canadian Telecommunications,” in Cowing, T.G., and R.E. Stevenson (eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, New York: Academic Press, 179–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. (1981) “The Theory of Total Factor Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries,” in Cowing, T.G., and R.E. Stevenson (eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, New York: Academic Press, 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. (1992) “Fisher ideal output, input, and productivity indexes revisited,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 211–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J. (1957) “The measurement of produtive efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 120(III), 253–281(290).

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., and S. Grosskopf (1992) “Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher Ideal indexes,” Economic Journal 102, 158–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and C.A.K. Lovell (1985) The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Boston, Dordrecht, Lancaster: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and C.A.K. Lovell (1994b) Production Frontiers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and P. Roos (1996) “On two Definitions of Productivity,” Economics Letters, 55, 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, B. Lindgren and P. Roos (1994a) “Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach,” in Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L.M. Seiford (eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R. (1996a) “The Malmquist productivity index, TFP and scale,” memorandum no. 233, Department of Economics, University of Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R. (1996b) “Economic interpretations of the Malmquist productivity index,” paper presented at Methodological Issues in Official Statistics Conference, Statistics Sweden, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F.R., and L. Hjalmarsson (1987) Analyses of Industrial Structure. A Putty-Clay Approach. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E., and C.A.K. Lovell (1995) “A note on the Malmquist productivity index,” Economics Letters 47, 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldi, J., and D. Whitcomb (1967) “Economies of Scale in Industrial Plants.” Journal of Political Economy, 75, 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. (1961) “Measurement of Capital in Relation to the Measurement of Other Economic Aggregates,” in F.A. Lutz and D.C. Hague (eds.), The Theory of Capital, London: MacMillan, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarsson, L. and A. Veiderpass (1992) “Productivity in Swedish electricity retail distribution,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, Supplement, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S.C. and L. Hjalmarsson (forthcoming) “Relative performance of public and private ownership under yardstick regulation: Swedish electricity retail distribution, 1970–1990,” European Economic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. (1953) “Index numbers and indifference surfaces,” Trabajos de Estadística, 4, 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorsteen, R.H. (1961) “On measuring productive potential and relative efficiency,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(3), 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimizu, M. and J.M. Page (1982) “Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: Dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia 1965–78,” Economic Journal 92, 920–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratten, C.F. (1971) “Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Industries.” Department of applied economics, Occasional Papers, No. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, W.E.G. (1960) Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bjurek, H., Førsund, F.R., Hjalmarsson, L. (1998). Malmquist Productivity Indexes: An Empirical Comparison. In: Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Russell, R.R. (eds) Index Numbers: Essays in Honour of Sten Malmquist. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4858-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4858-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6035-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4858-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics