Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Intelligent Manufacturing ((IMS))

  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

While the concepts behind object-oriented programming (OOP) have been around for a few years, it is only recently that this software engineering technique has become widely accepted. In addition, with the rapid rise in hardware performance, the traditional drawbacks of object-oriented programming systems (OOPS) (such as larger memory requirements and slower speed) have diminished in significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adiga, S. and Gadre, M. (1990) Object-oriented software modeling of a flexible manufacturing system. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 3, 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, D. G. and Stefik, M. (1983) The LOOPS Manual, Xerox Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B. W. (1988) A spiral model for software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumbaugh, D. (1990) Object-oriented programming in C. The C Users Journal, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. (1986) Object-oriented programming: An evolutionary approach, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabb, D. (1990) ACTOR offers a sophisticated OOP development system. Infoworld, October 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digitalk Inc. (1986) Smalltalk/V: Tutorial and programming handbook, Los-Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, M. A. and Stroustrup, B. (1990) The annotated C+ + reference manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading. MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. (1991) Basic concepts II (variations on a theme). Object-oriented languages, systems and applications, eds., G. Blair, J. Gallagher, D. Hutchison and D. Shepherd, Halsted Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassey, C. R. and Adiga, S. (1990) Berkeley Library of Objects for Control and Simulation of Manufacturing (BLOCS/M). Applications of object-oriented programming, (eds. L. Pinson and R. Wiener), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. and Robson, D. (1983) Smalltalk-80: The language and its implementation, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, M. (1988) Actor. Micro/Systems, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, M. (1990) Trellis: Turning designs into programs. Communications of the ACM, 33(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (1988) Object-Oriented Software Construction, Prentice-Hall, Hertfordshire, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micallef, J. (1988) Encapsulation, reusability and extendability in object-oriented programming languages. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, I. (1989) C+ +for C programmers. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig, M. (1987) Using Smalltalk to implement frames. AI Expert, 2(1), 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig, M., Morgan, T., Jacobs, J. and Wimberly, D. (1989) Object-oriented programming in AI — new choices. AI Expert, January, 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F. and Lorensen, W. (1991) Object-oriented modeling and design. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. H. (1989) A survey of object-oriented programming languages. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1(6) 5–11.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shemer, I. (1987) Systems analysis: A systemic analysis of a conceptual model. Communications of the ACM, 30(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M. and Bobrow, D. G. (1985) Object-oriented programming: Themes and variations. The AI Magazine, Winter, 40–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepstone Inc. (1989) The Objective-C Compiler v4.0 and ICpak 101 v4.0. Stepstone Corporation, Sandy Hook, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroustrup, B. (1987) The C+ + programming language. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stroustrup, B. (1990) On language wars. Hotline on Object-Oriented Technology, 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello, E. R. (1989) Object-oriented programming for artificial intelligence-A guide to tools and system design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, R. S. and Pinson, L. J. (1988) An Introduction to object-oriented programming and C+ +, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gadre, M. (1993). Comparing object-oriented programming languages. In: Adiga, S. (eds) Object-oriented Software for Manufacturing Systems. Intelligent Manufacturing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4844-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4844-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6028-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4844-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics