Advertisement

Subject Clitics in French and Romance Complex Inversion and Clitic Doubling

  • Dominique Sportiche
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 45)

Abstract

The analysis of the French construction of Complex Inversion illustrated in (1) below raises difficulties with respect to current conceptions of available phrase structure:
  1. (1)
    1. a.

      Jean est-il malade?

      ‘Is John sick?’

       
    2. b.

      Depuquis quand Jean est-il malade.

      ‘Since when is John sick.’

       
     

Keywords

Head Movement Main Clause Case Assignment Clitic Doubling Complex Inversion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, M., K. Johnson and I. Roberts: 1989, ‘Passive Arguments Raised’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 219–251.Google Scholar
  2. Brandi I. and P. Cordin: 1989, ‘Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter’, In O. Jaeggli and K. Safir, eds., Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  4. Bouchard, D.: 1982, On the Content of Empty Categories, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N.: 1992, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,’ MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  6. Cinque, G.: 1988, ‘On si Constructions and the Theory of Arb’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 521–581.Google Scholar
  7. Enç, M.: 1991, ‘The Semantics of Specificity’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 1–25.Google Scholar
  8. Grevisse, M.: 1980, Le Bon Usage, 11 ème edition, Editions Duculot, Paris-Gembloux.Google Scholar
  9. Jaeggli, O.: 1982 Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Jaeggli, O. and C. Silva Corvalan: 1986, Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Jaeggli, O. and K. Safir: 1989, The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kayne, R.: 1972, ‘Subject Inversion in French Interrogatives’, In J. Casagrande and B. Saciuk, eds., Generative Studies in Romance Languages, Newbury House, Rowley.Google Scholar
  13. Kayne, R.: 1975, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. Kayne, R.: 1984, Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Kayne, R.: 1991, ‘Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–686.Google Scholar
  16. Koopman, H.: 1993, ‘The Internal and External Distribution of Pronominal DPs’, this volume.Google Scholar
  17. Koopman, H.: 1994a, ‘Licensing Heads’, In N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot, eds., Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mc Closkey, J.: 1992, ‘On the Scope of Verb Movement in Irish’, unpublished ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  19. Morin, Y-C: 1979, ‘There is No Inversion of Subject Clitics in Modern French’, ms., Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  20. Morin, Y-C: 1985, ‘On Two French Subjectless Verbs voici and voilà’, Language 61.4.Google Scholar
  21. Noonan, M.: 1989, ‘Operator Licensing and the Case of French Interrogatives’, In Proceedings of the Eighth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 8, 315–330.Google Scholar
  22. Noonan, M.: 1992, ‘Case and Syntactic Geometry’, Doctoral Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  23. Perlmutter, D.: 1972, Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Pollock, J-Y.: 1990, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
  25. Renzi L. and L. Vanelli: 1982, ‘I Pronomi Sogetto in Alcune Varieta Romanze’, In Studi Linguistici in Onore di G.B,. Pelligrini, Pacini, Pisa.Google Scholar
  26. Rizzi, L.: 1986, ‘On the Status of Subject Clitics in Romance’, In O. Jaeggli and C. Silva Corvalan, eds., Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  27. Rizzi, L. and I. Roberts: 1989, ‘Complex Inversion in French,’ Probus 1, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberge, Y.: 1990, The Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.Google Scholar
  29. Safir, K.: 1985, Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Shlonsky, U.: 1988, ‘Complementizer Cliticization in Hebrew and the Empty Category Principle’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sportiche, D.: 1989, ‘Le Mouvement Syntaxique: Constraintes et Paramètres’, Languages 95, 35–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sportiche, D.: 1983, Structural Invarience and Symmetry in Syntax, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, distributed by the MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
  33. Sportiche, D.: 1988, ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.Google Scholar
  34. Sportiche, D.: 1995a, ‘Clitic Constructions’, In L. Zaring and J. Rooryck, eds., Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  35. Sportiche, D.: 1995b, ‘Sketch of a Reductionist Approach to Syntactic Variation and Dependencies’, In H. Campos and P. Kempchinsky, eds., Evolution and Revolution in Linguistics Theory, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sportiche, D.: 1995c, ‘French Predicate Clitics and Clause Structure’, In A. Cardinaletti and M.T. Guasti, eds., Small Clauses, Syntax and Semantics, volume 28, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Sportiche, D.: to appear, ‘Pronominal Clitic Dependencies’, In Henk van Riemsdijk, ed., Language Typology: Clitics in the European Languages, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Suñer, M.: 1991, ‘Two Properties of Clitics in Clitic-Doubled Constructions’, In J. Huang and R. May, eds., Logical Structure and Linguistic: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  39. Szabolcsi, A.: 1983, ‘On the non-Unitary Nature of Verb-Second’, ms., Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique Sportiche
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations