Advertisement

The Selection Properties of Aspectual Verbs

  • Anne Rochette
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 45)

Abstract

In the generative literature, it has generally been assumed that aspectual verbs like begin show mixed behaviour with respect to the distinction established between raising and control predicates. Although these verbs clearly behave as raising predicates, as shown by the paradigm sentences in (1) first pointed out by Perlmutter (1970), the fact that they can also occur in simple transitive structures, as shown in (2), has led many syntacticians to posit the existence of two subcategorization frames for these verbs.1

Keywords

Semantic Category Selection Property External Argument Selectional Restriction Small Clause 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, C.L.: 1968, Indirect Questions in English, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
  2. Burzio, L.: 1986, Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson, G.N.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. Freed, A. F.: 1979, The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation, Reidel, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grevisse, M.: 1975, Le Bon Usage, Editions J. Duculot, Gembloux.Google Scholar
  7. Grimshaw, J.: 1979, ‘Complement Selection and the Lexicon’, Linguistic Inquiry 10, 279–426.Google Scholar
  8. Kayne, R. S.: 1981, ‘On Certain Differences between French and English’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371.Google Scholar
  9. Kratzer, A.: 1995, ‘Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates’, In G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 125–175.Google Scholar
  10. Lamiroy, B.: 1987, ‘The complementation of aspectual verbs in French’, Language 63, 278–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Long, M. E.: 1974, Semantic Verb Classes and their Role in French Predicate Complementation, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Indiana, Bloomington. Distributed from 1976 by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  12. Newmeyer, F. J.: 1975, English Aspectual Verbs, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  13. Perlmutter, D. M.: 1970, ‘The Two Verbs Begin’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, Massachusetts, 107–120Google Scholar
  14. Pesetsky, D.: 1982, Paths and Categories, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  15. Pustejovsky, J.: 1988, ‘The Geometry of Events’, in C. Tenny, ed., Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect, Lexicon Project Working Papers 24, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 19–39.Google Scholar
  16. Pustejovsky, J.: 1991, ‘The Syntax of Event Structure’, Cognition 41, 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rizzi, L.: 1978, ‘A Restructuring Rule in Italian Syntax’, in S.J. Keyser, ed., Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 113–158.Google Scholar
  18. Rochette, A.: 1988, Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Romance Sentential Complementation, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Rochette, A.: 1990, ‘On the Restructuring Classes of Verbs in Romance’, in A.-M. Di Sciullo and A. Rochette, eds., Binding in Romance. Essays in Honour of Judith McA’Nulty, Special Publication of The Canadian Linguistic Association, Ottawa, 96–128.Google Scholar
  20. Rouveret, A. and J.-R. Vergnaud: 1980, ‘Specifying Refrence to the Subject: French Causatives and Conditions on Representations’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 97–202.Google Scholar
  21. Ruwet, N.: 1972, Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français, Le Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Ruwet, N.: 1983, ‘Montée et contrôle: Une question à revoir?’, Revue Romane 24, 17–37.Google Scholar
  23. Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics and Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  24. Voorst, J. van: 1993, ‘A Localist Model for Event Semantics’, Journal of Semantics 10, 65–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Rochette
    • 1
  1. 1.Université du Québec à MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations