Advertisement

The Internal and External Distribution of Pronominal DPs

  • Hilda Koopman
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 45)

Abstract

The form and distribution of pronouns varies considerably cross-linguistically. In this paper, I will propose that there is a direct relation between the form (i.e. DP internal realization), and syntactic distribution (i.e. DP external realization).

Keywords

Small Clause Overt Pronoun Person Agreement External Distribution Overt Syntax 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abney, S.: 1987, The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S.: 1982, ‘Where is Morphology’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 571–612.Google Scholar
  3. Awberry, G.: 1976, The Syntax of Welsh: A Transformational View of the Passive, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  4. Awberry, G.: 1990, ‘Dialect Syntax: a neglected source for Welsh’, in R. Hendrick ed.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, M.. and K. Hale: 1990, ‘Relativized Minimality and Pronoun Incorporation’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 289–297.Google Scholar
  6. Borer, H.: 1984, Parametric Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Borsley R. and J. Stephens: 1989, ‘Agreement and the position of subjects in Breton’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardinalleti, A.: 1993, ‘On the Internal structure of pronominal DPs’, ms. University of Venice.Google Scholar
  9. Carstens, V.: 1991, The Morphology and Syntax of Determiner Phrases in KiSwahili. Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  10. Carstens, V.: 1993, Deriving agreement, ms, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Freidin, ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N.: 1992, Towards a Minialist Program for Linguistic Theory, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 1.Google Scholar
  13. Chung, S. and J. McCloskey: 1987, ‘Government, barriers and small clauses in Modern Irish,’ Linguistic Inquiry 18, 173–237.Google Scholar
  14. Corver, N.: 1990, The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions, Doctoral Dissertation, Tilburg.Google Scholar
  15. Crook, H.: 1990, ‘The internal structure of DPs in Bambara’, MA thesis, UCLAGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimshaw, J.: 1991, ‘Extended Projections’, ms. Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  17. Hendrick, R.: 1989, Anaphora in Celtic and Universal Grammar Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Hendrick, R.: 1990, The Syntax of Modern Celtic Languages, San Diego: Academic Press, 27–79.Google Scholar
  19. Hestvik, A.: 1990, LF movement of Pronouns and the Computation of Binding Domains, Doctoral Dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
  20. Holmberg, A.: 1986, Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English, Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  21. Jackendoff, R.: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  22. Jaeggli, O.: 1981, Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, K.: 1991, ‘Object Positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9, 577–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kayne, R.: 1985, ‘Principles of Particle Constructions’, In J. Gueron, et al. eds. Grammatical Representation, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Kayne, R.: 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Twenty–five, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche: 1989, ‘Pronouns, Logical Variables and Logophoricity in Abe’, Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 555–589.Google Scholar
  27. Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche: 1991, ‘The Position of Subjects’, Lingua 85.2/3.Google Scholar
  28. Koopman, H.: 1984, The Syntax of Verbs, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Koopman, H.: 1988, ‘The Structure of the VP in Dutch’, paper presented in Geneva.Google Scholar
  30. Koopman, H.: 1991, ‘The Verb Particle Construction and the Syntax of PPs’, ms. UCLA.Google Scholar
  31. Koopman, H.: 1993, The Structure of Dutch PPs, ms. UCLA.Google Scholar
  32. Koopman, H.: 1994, ‘Licensing Heads’, in N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot, eds., Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Koopman, H. and D. Sportiche: 1982, ‘Variables and the Bijection Principle’, The Linguistic Review 2,139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCloskey J. and K. Hale: 1984, ‘On the syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 143–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCloskey, J.: 1992, ‘On the Scope of Verb Movement in Irish’, unpublished paper, UCSC.Google Scholar
  36. Moritz, L.: 1993, ‘DPs in Ncufie’, In H. Koopman and M. Kural, eds, The structure of Ncufie, UCLA Working papers..Google Scholar
  37. Nkemnji, M.: 1995, ‘Heavy Pied-piping in Nweh,’ Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  38. Postal, P.: 1969, ‘On the so-called “pronouns” in English’, In D. Reibel and S. Shane, eds. Modem Studies in English, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 201–224.Google Scholar
  39. Ritter, E.: 1991, ‘Two Functional categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew’, ms. UQAM..Google Scholar
  40. Rouveret, A.: 1990, ‘X-bar Theory, Minimality and Barrierhood in Welsh’, In R. Hendrick ed,Google Scholar
  41. Rouveret, A.: 1991, ‘Functional Categories and Agreement’, In The Linguistic Review, 353–387Google Scholar
  42. Sadler, L.: 1988, Welsh Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach, Croom H. Kent.Google Scholar
  43. Sportiche, D.: 1995, ‘Sketch of a Reductionist Approach to Syntactic Variations and Dependencies’, In H. Campos and P. Kempchinsky, eds., Evolution and Revolution in Romance Syntax, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sportiche, D.: 1995a, ‘Clitic Constructions’, In L. Zaring and J. Rooryck, eds., Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  45. Sportiche, D.: 1990, ‘Movement, Agreement and Case’, ms, UCLA.Google Scholar
  46. Stowell, T.: 1991, ‘Small Clause Restructuring’, In R. Freidin, ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  47. Stump, G.: 1984, ‘Agreement versus Incorporation in Breton’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 289–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stump, G.: 1989, ‘Further Remarks on Breton Agreement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 429–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Szabolci, A.: 1987, ‘Functional Categories in the Noun Phrase’, In I. Kenesei, ed., Hungarian vol. 2. Budapest: Jate Szeged.Google Scholar
  50. Taraldsen, T.: 1992, ‘Pronouns and agreement’, GLOW newsletter.Google Scholar
  51. Valois, D.: 1991, The Internal Syntax of DP, Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  52. Watkins, T. A: 1972, ‘The Welsh personal pronoun’, Word 28, 146–165.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, S. J.: 1980, A Welsh Grammar, University of Wales Press, Cardiff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilda Koopman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations