Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 45))

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the phenomena which have been regrouped under the titles of ‘clitic doubled constructions’, ‘clitic doubling’, or ‘argument doubling’. These phenomena have been the subject of extensive discussions in contemporary linguistic studies. I believe that their interest ultimately resides in the fact that they open a window on the formation of arguments; they allow us to better understand how argument structures are formed and how they are syntactically projected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aoun, J.: 1979, ‘On Government, Case Marking, and Clitic Placement’, ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J.: 1981, The Formal Nature of Anaphoric Relations. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J. and N. Hornstein: 1985, ‘Quantifier Types’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 623–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J.: 1993, ‘The Syntax of Doubled Arguments’, International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 27,709–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J., E. Benmamoun, and D. Sportiche: 1994, ‘Agreement, Word Order, and Conjunction in Some Varietes of Arabic’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, J. and Y. A. Li: 1989, ‘Constituency and Scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 124–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benmamoun, E.: 1992, Functional and Inflectional Morphology: Problems of Projection, Representation, and Derivation. Doctoral Dissertation, USC, Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H.: 1983, Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H.: 1986, ‘The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics’, In H. Borer, ed., Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H., and Y. Grodinsky: 1986, ‘Syntactic Cliticization and Lexical Cliticization: The Case of Hebrew Dative Clitics’, In H. Borer, ed., Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, M. A: 1987, Null Operator Constructions. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1982., Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1991, ‘Some Notes on the Economy of Derivations and Representations’, In R. Friedin, ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1992, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G.: 1990, Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirdache, H.: 1991, Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, C.: 1990, ‘Clitic-Doubling, Wh-Movement, and Quantification in Romanian’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 351–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, D.: 1984, ‘Pirana: Clitic-Doubling and the Parametrization of Nominal Clitics’, ms., MIT and SIL/UNICAMP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, R., and J. Higginbotham: 1981, ‘Opacity in NP’, Linguistic Analysis 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, J.: 1991, ‘Spanish Object Clitics as Verbal Agreement Morphemes’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 99–114. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A.: 1984, ‘Towards a Theory of Long Distance Anaphors: a GB Approach’, The Linguistic Review 3, 307–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, A: 1984, ‘Clitic Chains’, Ms., Simon Fraser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, S.: 1991, ‘Clitics and Island Effects’, ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O.: 1982, Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O.: 1986, ‘Three Issues in the Theory of Clitics: Case, Double NPs, and Extraction’, In H. Borer, ed., Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1975, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1984, Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H.: 1991, ‘Restrictions on Spec Positions’, ms., UCLA, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, M.: 1990, The Sentence Structure of Arabic. Doctoral Dissertation, USC, Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S.: 1983, The Syntactic Forms of Predication. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouveret, A, and J.-R. Vergnaud: 1980, ‘Specifying Reference to the Subject’, Linguistic Inquiry 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, B.: 1982, ‘Small Clauses and Predication’, ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Zioga, P.: 1990, ‘Double Object Constructions and Small Clauses’, ms. USC, Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Zioga, P.: 1993, The Syntax of Clitic Doubling in Modern Greek. Doctoral Dissertation, USC, Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, U.: 1991, ‘Quantifiers as Functional Heads: A Study of Quantifier Phrases and Quantifier Float’, Lingua 84, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1992, ‘Clitic Constructions’, ms., UCLA California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T.: 1991, ‘Small Clause Restructuring’, In R. Freidin., ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suñer, M.: 1988, ‘The Role of Agreement in Clitic Doubled Constructions’, NLT 6, 391–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suñer, M.: 1992, ‘Two Properties of Clitics in Clitic Doubled Constructions’, In J. Huang and R. May, eds., Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross Linguistic Perspectives. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, J.-R., and M.-L. Zubizarreta.: 1992, ‘The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and English’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 595–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1975, ‘Small Clauses in English’, In Syntax and Semantics 4, 249–273, ed. J.P. Kimball. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1980, Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aoun, J. (1999). Clitic-Doubled Arguments. In: Johnson, K., Roberts, I. (eds) Beyond Principles and Parameters. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5501-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4822-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics