Advertisement

Conclusion

  • C. F. Fowler
Chapter
  • 139 Downloads
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées book series (ARCH, volume 160)

Abstract

In Descartes’ estimation, Regius, in his Explicatio Mentis Humanae, that “certain broadsheet” of 1647, had either inadvertently stumbled or deliberately crashed through the protective barriers of sound philosophical principles into a theological minefield. Throughout his Notae Descartes showed no reticence in focusing the spotlight on Regius’ materialism and its alarming implications for the foundational Christian doctrines of the existence of God and the immortality of the soul. In fact, the deliberate aggravation of Regius’ conflicts with the theologians could be seen as one of Descartes’ principal aims in rushing into print with his response. Henri Gouhier commented on the Notae: “This is excommunication; from 1648 Cartesianism had its modernist heresy.”1

Keywords

Rational Demonstration Human Person Protective Barrier Substantial Union Handwritten Notation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. F. Fowler
    • 1
  1. 1.The Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations