Skip to main content

Cross-mating tests re-discovered: a tool to assess species boundaries in rotifers

  • Conference paper
  • 350 Accesses

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 134))

Abstract

The recent isolation of a mate recognition pheromone in the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis Müller has shed new light on the mate recognition system of rotifers. One result is improved understanding of the importance of mating behavior as a highly efficient process used by rotifers to choose conspecifics. There are many differences in the main characteristics of mating behavior in members of five different families of rotifers. The present work describes the use of these characteristics to assess species boundaries, especially where boundaries between two or more species are unclear. The method proposed here can assess quantitatively the response of males of one species to females of a questionable taxon by measuring the percentage of matings initiated and the number of completed copulations. The data generated can then be used together with molecular, morphological, and other data to determine the species boundaries. This approach can help distinguish between morphological differences resulting from evolutionary divergence of species and morphological differences induced by environmental or ecological factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Birky, C. W. Jr., 1967. Studies on the physiology and genetics of the rotifer Asplanchna. III. Results of outcrossing, selfing and selection. J. exp. Zool. 165: 104–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona, M. J., M. Serra & M. R. Miracle, 1993. Relationships between mixis in Brachionus plicatilis and preconditioning of culture medium by crowding. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., A. Hagiwara & K. Hirayama, 1993. Crossing between seven strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 59: 2009–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. M. & T. A. Langen, 1996. How do animals choose their mates? TIEE 11(11): 468–470.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1963. Contact chemoreception, mating behavior, and sexual isolation in the rotifer genus Brachionus. J. exp. Biol. 40: 625–641.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1983. Rotifera. In K. G. & R. G. Adiyodi (eds), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, Volume VI, Part A. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., Oxford, MA: 231–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. & C. E. Williamson, 1983. Sexual dimorphism in zooplankton (Copepoda, Cladocera, and Rotifera). Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., W. C. Birky & E. S. Wurdak, 1979. Taxonomic relationships of Asplanchna brightwelli, A. intermedia, and A. sieboldi. Arch. Hydrobiol. 87: 224–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, A. & M. Serra, 1995. Behavioral reproductive isolation among sympatric strains of Brachionus plicatilis Müller 1786: insights into the status of this taxonomic species. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, A. & T. W. Snell, 1996. Sibling species and cryptic speciation in the Brachionus plicatilis species complex (Rotifera). J. Evol. Biol. 9: 953–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara, A., T. Kotani, T. W. Snell, M. Assava-Aree & K. Hirayama, 1996. Morphology, reproduction, genetics, and mating behavior of small tropical marine Brachionus strains (Rotifera). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 194: 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koste, W., 1978. Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas, 2 vols, Gebrüder Borntraeger: 672 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, H. W., 1973. Growth media — freshwater. In J. R. Stem (ed.), Handbook of Phycological Methods, Cambridge University Press, London: 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogrady, T., R. L. Wallace & T. W. Snell, 1993. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world, Volume 4: Rotifera. SPB Academic Publishing: 142 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H., 1985. The recognition concepts of species. In E. S. Vbra (ed.), Species and Speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4. Pretoria: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R. W., 1989. Fresh water invertebrates of the United States, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 628 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, T. R. & S. S. S. Sarma. 1985. Mictic and amictic modes of reproduction in the rotifer Brachionus patulus Müeller. Curr. Sci. 54:499–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martünez, R., 1995. Contribution to the knowledge of speciation in Rotifera. Ph. D. Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology. Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.: 140 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martinez, R. & S. I. Dodson, 1992. Culture of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas. Aquaculture 105: 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martinez, R. & T. W. Snell, 1995a. Mating behavior and mate recognition pheromone blocking of male receptors inBrachionus plicatilis Müller (Rotifera) strains. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martinez, R. & T. W. Snell, 1995b. Male discrimination of female Brachionus plicatilis Müller and Brachionus rotundi-formis Tschugunoff (Rotifera) strains. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 190: 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martinez, R., B. Dingmann & T. W. Snell, 1996. Surface glycoproteins potentially involved in mate recognition in nine freshwater rotifer species. Arch. Hydrobiol. 138: 1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1969. Kreuzungsexperimente zwischen Brachionus urceolaris und Brachionus quadridentatus, einbeitrag zur fortpflanzungsbiologie der heterogonen Rotatoria. Arch. Hydrobiol. 65: 397–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H., G. Murugan & H. J. Dumont, 1993. On the taxonomy of the Brachionidae: description of Plationus n. gen. (Rotifera, Monogononta). Hydrobiologia 268: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M., A. Galiana & A. Gómez, 1997. Speciation in monogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia 358 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 124): 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., 1989. Systematics, reproductive isolation and species boundaries in monogonont rotifers. Hydrobiologia 147: 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & M. Childress, 1987. Aging and loss of fertility in male and female Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Int. J. Invertebrate Reprod. Dev. 12: 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & C. A. Hawkinson, 1983. Behavioral reproductive isolation among populations of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Evolution 37: 1294–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & F. H. Hoff, 1987. Fertilization and male fertility in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Hydrobiologia 147: 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & M. A. Nacionales, 1990. Sex pheromone communication in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 97A: 211–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., R. Rico-Martínez, L. S. Kelly & T. E. Battle, 1995. Identification of a sex pheromone from a rotifer. Mar. Biol. 123 347–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, R. S., 1979. A guide to rotifers of the Laurentian Great Lakes. In C. I. Weber, (ed.), EPA-600/4-79-021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC: 185 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A. R., 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In D. Otte & Endler, J. A. (eds), Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1985. Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents to freshwater and marine organisms. In W. H. Peltier & Weber, C. I. (eds), EPA-600/4-85-013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vbra, E. S., 1995. Species as habitat-specific, complex systems. In D. M. Lambert & Spencer, H. G. (eds), Speciation and the Recognition Concept. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, MD 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. Wurdak R. Wallace H. Segers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rico-Martínez, R. (1998). Cross-mating tests re-discovered: a tool to assess species boundaries in rotifers. In: Wurdak, E., Wallace, R., Segers, H. (eds) Rotifera VIII: A Comparative Approach. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 134. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4782-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4782-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6009-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4782-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics