Advertisement

Community Forestry Development in India

  • Ajit Kumar Banerjee
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 1)

Abstract

In India, forestry development paradigms, other than community based ones, have become anachronistic and should be rejected in order to make further headway. The present method of forestry development, referred to as a scientific management system has been practiced for the last 130 years. However this system is unable to sustain the quantity and quality of India’s forests and it thus fails to meet the demands of the rising local population for industrial wood, fuelwood and needs for non-wood products and recreation. The demand for roundwood in 1995 was 299 mill. m3(FA0 1997). The forest area has continued to contract (339 000 ha per year during the period 1981-1990; FAO 1993) and its quality and stock have degenerated. This, in turn, has encouraged soil erosion, floods, landslides, loss of biodiversity and loss of production.

Keywords

Forest Department Community Forestry Degraded Forest Closed Forest Social Forestry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, J.E.M. 1990. Social Forestry and Communal Management in India. Social Forestry Network: Network Paper 11b. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Arora, D. 1994. From State Regulation to People’s Participation: Case of Forest Management in India. Economic and Political Weekly. 19 March 1994. Pp. 691–698.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, A.K. 1986. Community Woodlots-Technical Aspects. World Bank, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A.K. 1993. Natural Regeneration of West Bengal Forests of India. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, A.K. 1994. Rehabilitation of Degraded Forests in Asia. Technical Paper 270. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A.K. 1996. The Role of the Local Government and Civil Society in Promoting Community Forestry and Social Forestry. In Community Forestry: As a strategy of sustainable forestry management. Proceedings of the International Conference, 1996. DENR and ITTO, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  7. Banuri, T. and Marglin, F.A. (eds.) 1993. Who will Save the Forests? UNU/WIDER. Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  8. Chatterjee, A.P. 1996. Community Forest Management in Arabari: Understanding Sociocultural and Subsistence Issues. Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  9. FAO 1993. Forest Resources Assessment 1990: Tropical Countries. FAO Forestry Paper 112. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  10. FAO 1995. Forest Resources Assessment 1990: Global Synthesis. FAO Forestry Paper 124. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  11. FAO 1997. FAO Yearbook of Forest Products 1995. FAO Forestry Series 30. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  12. Fox, J. (ed.) 1993. Legal Frameworks for Forest Management in Asia. Occasional Paper 16 of East-West Center, Program on Environment, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  13. Government of India 1991. The State of Forest Report, 1991. Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
  14. Guha, R. 1993. The Malign Encounter: The Chipko Movement and Competing Visions of Nature. In T. Banuri and F.A. Marglin (eds.), Who Will Save the Forests? UNU/WIDER. Helsinki, Finland. Pp. 80–113.Google Scholar
  15. Lynch, O.J. and Talbott, K. 1995. Balancing Acts: Community Based Management and National Law in Asia and the Pacific. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, K. and Tangley, L. 1991. Trees of Life: Saving Tropical Forests and Their Biological Wealth. World Resources Institute. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Patnaik, B.K. and Dutta, S. 1997. JFM in South-West Bengal: A study in Participatory Development. Economic and Political Weekly. 13 December 1997. Pp. 3225–3232.Google Scholar
  18. Patnaik, S.S., Barik, S.K. and Shukla, G.P. 1996. Arunachal Forest Pradesh Act-1975: A Conceptual Change from Partnership Management of High Forests to Participatory Forest Management. Paper presented at 5th Asia Forest Network Meeting, Surajkund, India.Google Scholar
  19. Poffenberger, M., Bhattacharya, P. et al. 1996. Grassroots Forest Protection: Eastern India Experiences. Research Network Report 7. Asia Forestry Network. Berkeley, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Poffenberger, M. and McGean, B. (eds.) 1996. Village Voices, Forest Choices. Oxford University Press, Delhi.Google Scholar
  21. Roy, S.B. 1993. Forest Protection Committees in West Bengal, India. In J. Fox (ed.), Legal Frameworks for Forest Management in Asia. Occasional Paper 16 of East-West Center, Program on Environment, Honolulu. Pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
  22. Sarin, M. 1996. From Conflict to Collaboration: Institutional Issues in Community management. In M. Poffenberger and B. McGean (eds.), Village Voices, Forest Choices. Oxford University Press, Delhi. Pp. 165–209.Google Scholar
  23. Saxena, K.G. and Ramakrishnan, P.S. 1984. Herbaceous Vegetation Development and Weed Potential in Slash and Burn Agriculture. Wood Research Vol. 24: 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh, Samar, Datta, Avenash et al. 1997. Participatory Forest Management in West Bengal. WWF-India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  25. Society for Promotion of Wasteland Development (SPWD) 1992. Joint Forest Management: Concepts and Opportunities. Proceedings of the National Workshop. August 1992. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  26. World Bank 1993. India: Policies and Issues in Forest Sector Development. Report No. 10965-In. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. World Bank 1995. Staff Appraisal Report, India. Eco-develop-ment Project. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. World Wide Fund for Nature-India (WWF) 1995. Nature Conservation Handbook. Eastern Region of WWF, Calcutta.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajit Kumar Banerjee

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations