Abstract
Scientists in Germany after World War II faced a short period of international isolation. There was no official boycott comparable to the one that was implemented after World War I. But in many cases, scientific connections with Germans were cut, Germans were not invited to international congresses, or they were invited only individually, according to their assumed integrity during the National Socialist (NS) past. In particular, geneticists — above all, human geneticists — were criticised for having supported the ideological ends of Nazi Germany and for having provided the scientific basis for genocide programs. Hermann Muller used the term “prostitution of science”1 to describe the readiness with which many geneticists in Germany used their field to support the Nazi ideology and murderous practice. To name only the leading human geneticists who were criticised in this respect: Eugen Fischer, professor of anthropology in Berlin, and who, until 1942, was director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (KWI) for Anthropology, Human Genetics, and Eugenics; Otmar von Verschuer, professor of genetic care and race hygiene, who became Fischer’s successor in the KWI in 1942; and Fritz Lenz, professor of race hygiene and department head of the KWI. All three men were known to have supported not only racial hygiene but also the anti-Jewish and racist views and laws of the regime. The extent of the close cooperation of von Verschuer with Joseph Mengele in Auschwitz became known only much later.
This paper is based on my larger study Biologists Under Hitler (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Hermann Mullerto Max Delbrück, February 24, 1947, Delbrück papers, California Institute of Technology.
Paul Weindling, Health, Race, and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870-1945, (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 566.
Hans Nachtsheimto Hans Grüneberg, April 2, 1948, Grüneberg papers, ICHM London; personal communication by Jonathan Harwood.
Peter Weingart,Jürgen Kroll, and Kurt Bayertz, Rasse, Blut und Gene — Geschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988), p.583.
The Habilitation is an academic degree beyond the doctorate, which allowed the holder to teach at a university.
Personal communication by Jonathan Harwood, August 1993.
Ibid.
Gutachten der Dozentenschaft betr. n.b.a.o. Prof. Dr. Nachtsheim, November 17, 1936, Archiv Humboldt-Univ., ZGI/742. (After the Gleichschaltung of the universities in 1933, the Reich education minister based his decisions about positions on expert opinions from the faculty and the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei; they dealt with the scientific expertise, as well as the political attitude of the person.)
Hans Nachtsheim to Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, May 14, 1937, Bundesarchiv Koblenz, R73/13328. Nachtshein wrote that he had successfully started “ein neues, auch für die menschliche Rassenhygiene wichtiges Gebiet. “
Diane B. Paul, “The Cold War in Genetics: Hans Nachtsheim and Human Genetics in Post-War Germany,” address given at the History of Science Annual Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico, November 12, 1993.1 didn’t get access to the Nachtsheim papers in the Archives of the Max-Planck-Society and therefore thank Diane Paul for this information.
Hans Nachtsheim, ‘Erbleiden beim Tier in ihrer Bedeutung für die menschliche Erbpathologie,” Naturwissenschaften, 32 (1944), pp. 348–361.
Gerhard Ruhenstroth-Bauer and Hans Nachtsheim, “Die Bedeutung des Sauerstoffmangels für die Auslösung des epileptischen Anfalls,” Klinische Wochenschrift, 23 (1944), pp. 18–21.
Hans Nachtsheim to Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, March 15, 1944, Bundesarchiv Koblenz, R 73/15342.
Gerhard Ruhenstroth-Bauer and Hans Nachtshei, “Die Bedeutung des Sauerstoffmangels für die Auslösung des epileptischen Anfalls,” Klinische Wochenschrift, 23 (1944), pp. 18–21.
Benno Müller-Hill, “Genetics after Auschwitz,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 2 (1987), pp. 3–20.
Gerhard Koch, Humangenetik und Neuro-Psychiatrie in meiner Zeit (1932-1978) — Jahre der Entscheidung (Erlangen: Palm & Enke, 1993), p. 125.
This and all subsequent translations from the German are my own.
Ernst Klee, “Euthanasie” im NS-Staat-Die “Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens” (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1983), p. 300.
H.-H. Knaape to B. Müller-Hill, 5 December, 1988
Hans Nachtsheim, Für und wider die Sterilisation aus eugenischer Indikation, Stuttgart 1952, p. 50.
Alexander Mitscherlich, “Eugenik — Notwendigkeit und Gefahr,” Fortschr. Med., 81 (1963), pp. 714–715.
Hans Nachtsheim, “Bourgeoise Biologie,” Der Tagesspiegel, August 5, 1948.
Hans Nachtsheim, “Lyssenkos Ende,” Deutsche Kommentare, April 14, 1956.
See my larger study, Biologists, chapter2–4.
See, for example, Joseph Needham, The Nazi Attack on International Science, (London: Watts & Co., 1941).
Ute Deichmann and Benno Müller-Hill, “Biological Research at Universities and Kaiser Wilhelm-Institutes in Nazi Germany,” Science, Technology and National Socialism, ed. Monika Renneberg and Mark Walker (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 160–183.
The impact of Lysenko on the biosciences in the USSR has been analyzed, for example, by David Joravsky, The Lysenko Affair, reprint (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970).
For comparison of Hitler’s and Stalin’s terrors, see, for example, Alan Bullock, Hitler and Stalin. Parallel lives (London: Harper Collins, 1991).
Benno Müller-Hill, Murderous Science. Elimination by Selection of Jews, Gypsies and Others, Germany 1933-1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 70–74.
Weindling, Health, Race, p. 569; Weingart, Kroll and Bayertz, Rasse, Blut, p. 575. I didn’t get access to the Nachtsheim papers in the Archives of the Max-Planck-Society, which contain the correspondence with Havemann.
See Weingart, Kroll, and Bayertz, Rasse, Blut, pp. 572–581.
Hans Harald Bräutigam, “Tod nach Kalender,” Die Zeit, January 20, 1989.
Hans Nachtsheim to Otmar von Verschuer, March 12, 1945; I thank Raphael Falk for having shown this letter to me, cited in his unpublished manuscript “Hans Nachtsheim: How to be a Eugenicist in National Socialist Germany and Prevail.”
Hans Nachtsheim to L.C. Dunn, February 14, 1961 (author’s translation), in Paul, “The Cold War in Genetics….”
Hans Harald Bräutigam, “Tod nach Kalender,” Die Zeit, January 20, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deichmann, U. (1999). Hans Nachtsheim, A Human Geneticist Under National Socialism, and the Question of Freedom of Science. In: Fortun, M., Mendelsohn, E. (eds) The Practices of Human Genetics. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4718-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4718-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5985-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4718-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive