Skip to main content

Hans Nachtsheim, A Human Geneticist Under National Socialism, and the Question of Freedom of Science

  • Chapter
The Practices of Human Genetics

Part of the book series: Sociology of the Sciences ((SOSC,volume 21))

  • 189 Accesses

Abstract

Scientists in Germany after World War II faced a short period of international isolation. There was no official boycott comparable to the one that was implemented after World War I. But in many cases, scientific connections with Germans were cut, Germans were not invited to international congresses, or they were invited only individually, according to their assumed integrity during the National Socialist (NS) past. In particular, geneticists — above all, human geneticists — were criticised for having supported the ideological ends of Nazi Germany and for having provided the scientific basis for genocide programs. Hermann Muller used the term “prostitution of science”1 to describe the readiness with which many geneticists in Germany used their field to support the Nazi ideology and murderous practice. To name only the leading human geneticists who were criticised in this respect: Eugen Fischer, professor of anthropology in Berlin, and who, until 1942, was director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (KWI) for Anthropology, Human Genetics, and Eugenics; Otmar von Verschuer, professor of genetic care and race hygiene, who became Fischer’s successor in the KWI in 1942; and Fritz Lenz, professor of race hygiene and department head of the KWI. All three men were known to have supported not only racial hygiene but also the anti-Jewish and racist views and laws of the regime. The extent of the close cooperation of von Verschuer with Joseph Mengele in Auschwitz became known only much later.

This paper is based on my larger study Biologists Under Hitler (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Hermann Mullerto Max Delbrück, February 24, 1947, Delbrück papers, California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Weindling, Health, Race, and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870-1945, (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 566.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hans Nachtsheimto Hans Grüneberg, April 2, 1948, Grüneberg papers, ICHM London; personal communication by Jonathan Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peter Weingart,Jürgen Kroll, and Kurt Bayertz, Rasse, Blut und Gene — Geschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988), p.583.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Habilitation is an academic degree beyond the doctorate, which allowed the holder to teach at a university.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Personal communication by Jonathan Harwood, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutachten der Dozentenschaft betr. n.b.a.o. Prof. Dr. Nachtsheim, November 17, 1936, Archiv Humboldt-Univ., ZGI/742. (After the Gleichschaltung of the universities in 1933, the Reich education minister based his decisions about positions on expert opinions from the faculty and the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei; they dealt with the scientific expertise, as well as the political attitude of the person.)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hans Nachtsheim to Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, May 14, 1937, Bundesarchiv Koblenz, R73/13328. Nachtshein wrote that he had successfully started “ein neues, auch für die menschliche Rassenhygiene wichtiges Gebiet. “

    Google Scholar 

  10. Diane B. Paul, “The Cold War in Genetics: Hans Nachtsheim and Human Genetics in Post-War Germany,” address given at the History of Science Annual Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico, November 12, 1993.1 didn’t get access to the Nachtsheim papers in the Archives of the Max-Planck-Society and therefore thank Diane Paul for this information.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hans Nachtsheim, ‘Erbleiden beim Tier in ihrer Bedeutung für die menschliche Erbpathologie,” Naturwissenschaften, 32 (1944), pp. 348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerhard Ruhenstroth-Bauer and Hans Nachtsheim, “Die Bedeutung des Sauerstoffmangels für die Auslösung des epileptischen Anfalls,” Klinische Wochenschrift, 23 (1944), pp. 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hans Nachtsheim to Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, March 15, 1944, Bundesarchiv Koblenz, R 73/15342.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerhard Ruhenstroth-Bauer and Hans Nachtshei, “Die Bedeutung des Sauerstoffmangels für die Auslösung des epileptischen Anfalls,” Klinische Wochenschrift, 23 (1944), pp. 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benno Müller-Hill, “Genetics after Auschwitz,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 2 (1987), pp. 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerhard Koch, Humangenetik und Neuro-Psychiatrie in meiner Zeit (1932-1978) — Jahre der Entscheidung (Erlangen: Palm & Enke, 1993), p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  17. This and all subsequent translations from the German are my own.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ernst Klee, “Euthanasie” im NS-Staat-Die “Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens” (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1983), p. 300.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H.-H. Knaape to B. Müller-Hill, 5 December, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hans Nachtsheim, Für und wider die Sterilisation aus eugenischer Indikation, Stuttgart 1952, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alexander Mitscherlich, “Eugenik — Notwendigkeit und Gefahr,” Fortschr. Med., 81 (1963), pp. 714–715.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hans Nachtsheim, “Bourgeoise Biologie,” Der Tagesspiegel, August 5, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hans Nachtsheim, “Lyssenkos Ende,” Deutsche Kommentare, April 14, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See my larger study, Biologists, chapter2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, for example, Joseph Needham, The Nazi Attack on International Science, (London: Watts & Co., 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ute Deichmann and Benno Müller-Hill, “Biological Research at Universities and Kaiser Wilhelm-Institutes in Nazi Germany,” Science, Technology and National Socialism, ed. Monika Renneberg and Mark Walker (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 160–183.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The impact of Lysenko on the biosciences in the USSR has been analyzed, for example, by David Joravsky, The Lysenko Affair, reprint (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  28. For comparison of Hitler’s and Stalin’s terrors, see, for example, Alan Bullock, Hitler and Stalin. Parallel lives (London: Harper Collins, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Benno Müller-Hill, Murderous Science. Elimination by Selection of Jews, Gypsies and Others, Germany 1933-1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weindling, Health, Race, p. 569; Weingart, Kroll and Bayertz, Rasse, Blut, p. 575. I didn’t get access to the Nachtsheim papers in the Archives of the Max-Planck-Society, which contain the correspondence with Havemann.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Weingart, Kroll, and Bayertz, Rasse, Blut, pp. 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hans Harald Bräutigam, “Tod nach Kalender,” Die Zeit, January 20, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hans Nachtsheim to Otmar von Verschuer, March 12, 1945; I thank Raphael Falk for having shown this letter to me, cited in his unpublished manuscript “Hans Nachtsheim: How to be a Eugenicist in National Socialist Germany and Prevail.”

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hans Nachtsheim to L.C. Dunn, February 14, 1961 (author’s translation), in Paul, “The Cold War in Genetics….”

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hans Harald Bräutigam, “Tod nach Kalender,” Die Zeit, January 20, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deichmann, U. (1999). Hans Nachtsheim, A Human Geneticist Under National Socialism, and the Question of Freedom of Science. In: Fortun, M., Mendelsohn, E. (eds) The Practices of Human Genetics. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4718-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4718-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5985-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4718-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics