Advertisement

Awareness and Automaticity in Reading

  • Finn Egil Tønnessen
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 16)

Abstract

It is no exageration to say that without professor Torleiv Høien’s insight and inspiration, I would not be working in the field of dyslexia research today. I had completely different plans back then, when Torleiv, with his characteristic and infectious enthusiasm told me about all the important and fascinating challenges and unsolved problems in the field of reading research. These conversations were the start of many years of fruitful cooperation and friendship. It is therefore with joy that I am allowed through this Festschrift to voice some of my gratitude for these many years of common work.

Keywords

Phonological Awareness Analogical Reasoning Reading Acquisition Phonological Skill Reading Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, P.L., Sternberg, R.J. & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (1989). Learning and individual differences. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, D. & Dienes, Z. (1992). Implicit and explicit knowledge in human performance. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Bower, G.H. & Hilgard, E.R. (1975). Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Brady, S.A. & Shankweiler, D. (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Chipman, S.F., Segal, J.W. & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (1985). Thinking and learning skills. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Colley, A.M. & Beech, J.R. (eds.) (1989). Acquisition and performance of cognitive skills. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Denckla, M.B. & Rudel, R.G. (1976). Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.). Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehri, L.C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal readers and dyslexies. In B.A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia. Implications for early intervention, (pp. 163–189). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Ericsson, K.A. & Smith, J. (Eds.) (1991). Toward a general theory of expertice: Prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R. & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fawcett, A.J. & Nicolson, R.I. (1994). Speed of processing, motor skill, automaticity and dyslexia. In A.J. Fawcett & R.I. Nicolson (eds.). Dyslexia in hildren. Multidisciplinary perspectives. New York: Harwester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  14. Fitts, P.M. & Posner, M.I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  15. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  16. Frith, U. (1981). Experimental approaches in developmental dyslexia: an introduction. Psychological Research, 43, 97–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gagné, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction, 4th ed. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  18. Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Goswami, U. & Bryant, P.E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Gough, P.B., Ehri, L.C. & Treiman, T. (eds.) (1992). Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Hiebert, J. (Ed.) (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Kanfer, R., Ackerman, P.L. & Cudeck, R. (Eds.) (1989). Abilities, motivation and methodology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leong, C.K. (1994). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition: Some issues. In K.P. van den Bos, L.S. Siegel & D.L. Share (eds.) Current directions in dyslexia research (pp. 183–199). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  25. Liberman, I.Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1979). Speech, the alphabet, and teaching to read. In L.B. Resnick & P.A. Weaver (eds.). Theory and practice in early reading. (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Logan, G.D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatisation. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A. & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phoneme awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsh, G., Friedman, M.P., Welch, V. & Desberg, P. (1980). A cognitive-developmental approach to reading acquisition. In G.E. MacKinnon & T.G. Waller (eds.). Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, vol 3, pp. 199–221. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nicolson, R.I. & Fawcett, A.J. (1990). Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia research? Cognition, 30, 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nicholson, R.I. & Fawcett, A.J. (1995). Dyslexia is more than a phonological disability. Dyslexia, 1, 19–36.Google Scholar
  31. Olson, R., Wise, B. & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic and phonological skills. In G.R. Lyon (ed.). Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on assessment issues. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Reber, A.S. (1993) Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. An essay on the cognitive unconscoius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Reber, A.S. (1995). Dictionary of psychology (2nd edition). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Rumelhart, D.E. & McClelland, J.L. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol I: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Share, D.L. & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accomodating individual differences into a mode of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–57.Google Scholar
  37. Shiffrin, R.M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 3, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Singley, M.K. & Anderson, J.R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Response to Christensen. Reading Research Quarterly 27, 279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stanovich, K.E. (1993). The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. In G.R. Lyon, D. Gray, J. Kavanagh & N. Krasnegor (eds.). Better understanding learning disabilities: New views on research and their implications for public policies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Tønnessen, F.E. (1995). On defining ‘dyslexia’. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 2, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tønnessen, F.E. (1997a). How can we best define ‘dyslexia’? Dyslexia, 3, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tønnessen, F.E. (1997b). Can reading be taught? Reading Today, June.Google Scholar
  45. Tønnessen, F.E. (1997c). Treating dyslexia and teaching reading. Nordic Journal of Special Education, 3, 100–106.Google Scholar
  46. Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F. & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488–522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M. & Tanzman, M.S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding and orthographical coding. In G.R. Lyon (ed.) Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  48. Wagner, R.K. & Torgesen, J.J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing, and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yap, R. & van der Leij, A. (1993a). Rate of elementary symbol processing in dyslexies. In S.F. Wright & R. Groner (eds.). Facets of dyslexia and its remediation, (pp. 337–349). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
  51. Yap, R. & van der Leij, A. (1993b). Word processing in dyslexies. An automatic decoding deficit? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yap, R. & van der Leij, A. (1994). Testing the Automatization Deficit Hypothesis of dyslexia via a dual-task paradigm. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 10, 660–665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Finn Egil Tønnessen
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Reading ResearchStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations