Advertisement

A Diagnostic Procedure Based on Reading Component Model

  • R. Malatesha Joshi
Chapter
Part of the Neuropsychology and Cognition book series (NPCO, volume 16)

Abstract

It is estimated that approximately 25 percent of the elementary age school children have some type of reading problem (Stedman & Kaestle, 1987). It is not surprising, therefore, that millions of dollars are spent on specialized programs such as Title I and other remedial reading programs to make children better readers. It is also recognized that early identification is essential if remediation is to be effective. If these children are not identified early for remedial purposes, a vicious cycle sets in resulting in the Matthew Effect in education (Stanovich, 1986; Walberg & Tsai, 1983).

Keywords

Reading Comprehension Poor Reader Reading Disability Matthew Effect Decode Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron, P.G. (1994). Dyslexia and hyperlexia. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Aaron, P.G. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 178–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aaron, P.G., & Joshi, R.M. (1992). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, R.M., Ayotollah, M., Ellsberry, A., Henderson, J., & Lindsey, K. (1998). Decoding and sight-word naming: Are they two independent components of word recognition skill? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.Google Scholar
  5. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, R.M., & Williams, K.A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  6. Boder, E., & Jarrico, S. (1982). The Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns: A Diagnostic Screening Test for Subtypes of Reading Disability. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, P.G. & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming-speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 41, 1059–1068.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr, T. (1982). What’s in a model: Reading theory and reading instruction. In H. Singer (Ed.), Competent reader, disabled reader: Research and application (pp. 125–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Carver, R.P. (1998). Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of reading, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 121–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In J. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing, (pp. 151–216). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dennis, I., & Evans, J.B.T. (1996). The speed-error trade-off problem in psychometric testing. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehri, L.C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Ehri, L.C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, F., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I.Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive process in spelling (pp. 495–516). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gentry, R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192–200.Google Scholar
  18. Glaser, R. (1981). The future of testing: A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36, 923–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glass, G. (1986). Testing old, testing new: Schoolboy psychology and the allocation of intellectual resources. In B.S. Plake, & J.C. Witt (Eds.), The future of testing (pp. 9–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanna, P.R., Hanna, J.S., Hodges, R.E., & Rudorf, E.H. Jr. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Henderson, E. (1990). Teaching spelling. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  23. Hoover, W. & Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joshi, R.M. (1995). Assessing reading and spelling skills. School Psychology Review, 24, 361–375.Google Scholar
  25. Joshi, R.M., & Aaron, P.G. (1991). Developmental reading and spelling disabilities: Are these dissociable? In R.M. Joshi (Ed.), Written language disorders (pp. 1–24). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joshi, R.M., & Aaron, P.G., & Merenova, E. (1998). Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading, San Diego, April 18, 1998.Google Scholar
  27. Joshi, R.M., & Leong, C.K. (Eds.). (1993). Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and component processes. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Joshi, R.M., Williams, K.A., & Wood, J. (1998). Predicting reading comprehension from listening comprehension: Is this the answer to the IQ debate? In C. Hulme & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 319–327). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Markwardt, F.C. (1989). Peabody Individual Achievement Test — Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
  30. Moats, L.C. (1995). Spelling: Development, disability, and instruction. Baltimore, MD: York Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Palmer, J., McCleod, C., Hunt, E., & Davidson, J. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rinsland, H. (1947). A basic vocabulary of elementary school children. New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
  33. Royer, J.M., & Sinatra, G.M. (1994). A cognitive theoretical approach to reading diagnostics. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz, S. (1980). Measuring reading competence: A theoretical-prescriptive approach. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sinatra, G.M., & Royer, J.M. (1994). A cognitive-diagnostic approach to reading problems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  36. Spache, G.D. (1940). Characteristic errors of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 34, 182–189.Google Scholar
  37. Spring, C., & French, L. (1990). Identifying children with specific reading disabilities from listening and reading discrepancy scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 53–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stanovich, K., Cunningham, A.E., & Feeman, D.J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 175–190.Google Scholar
  40. Stedman, L.C., & Kaestle, C.E. (1987). Literacy and reading performance in the United States from 1880 to the present. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 8–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R.J. (1981). Testing and cognitive psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 1181–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tangel, D.M., & Blachman, B.A. (1995). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on kindergarten children’s invented spelling. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 133–261.Google Scholar
  44. Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Treiman, R. (1998). Beginning to spell in English. In C. Hulme & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 371–393), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  46. Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1997). Spelling acquisition in English. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 61–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  47. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 559–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Venezky, R. (1976). Theoretical and experimental base for teaching reading. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  49. Vinsonhaler, J.S., Weinshank, A.B., Wagner, C.C., & Polin, R.M. (1983). Diagnosing children with educational problems: Characteristics of reading and learning disabilities specialists, and classroom teachers. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 134–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walberg, H.J., & Tsai, S. (1983). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 359–373.Google Scholar
  51. Waters, G.S., Bruck, M., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waters, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 12, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woodcock, R.J. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
  54. Woodcock, R.J. (1991). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery-Revised. Chicago, IL. Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  55. Woodcock, R.J. (1997). Woodcock Diagnostic reading Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Malatesha Joshi
    • 1
  1. 1.Oklahoma State UniversityStilwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations