Skip to main content

Surrogate end-points for clinical trials in renal transplantation

  • Chapter
Immunosuppression under Trial

Part of the book series: Transplantation and Clinical Immunology ((TRAC,volume 31))

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical trials are carried out to develop therapies that are best for our patients. Most clinicians would agree that the best therapies are those that have the greatest efficacy and the least toxicity, i.e. those that have the highest benefitto-risk ratios. End-points in clinical trials are clearly defined events or measurements that reflect the efficacy and/or toxicity of therapy; they generally need to be understandable and reproducible and must occur frequently enough to allow therapy to be tested in a reasonably small number of patients over a relatively short period of time to make a clinical trial feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group. A randomized clinical trial of cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986; 314: 1219–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. European Multicentre Trial Group. Cyclosporin in cadaveric renal transplantation: one-year follow-up of a multicentre trial. Lancet. 1983; 2: 986–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. West M, Sutherland DER, Matas AJ. Kidney transplant recipients who die with functioning grafts. Serum creatinine level and cause of death. Transplantation. 96 A.D.; 62: 1029–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirata M, Cho YW, Cecka JM et al. Patient death after renal transplantation - an analysis of its role in graft outcome Proposed consensus for definitions and end-points for clinical trials of acute kidney transplant rejection. Transplantation. 1996; 61: 1479–1483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guttmann RD, Soulillou JP, Moore LW et al. Proposed consensus for definitions and endpoints for clinical trials of acute kidney transplant rejection. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1998; 31 (Suppl 1): S40–S46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaber LW, Moore LW, Gaber AO et al. Utility of standardized histological classification in the management of acute rejection. 1995 Efficacy End-points Conference. Transplantation. 1998; 65: 376–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Halloran P, Mathew T, Tomlanovich S, Groth C, Hooftman L, Barker C. Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients. A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection. Transplantation. 1997; 63: 39–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathew TH. A blinded, long-term, randomized multicenter study of mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplantation: results at three years. Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group. Transplantation. 1998; 65: 1450–1454.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Braun WE, Popowniak KL, Nakamoto S, Gifford RWJ, Straffon RA. The fate of renal allografts functioning for a minimum of 20 years. Transplantation. 1995; 60: 784–790.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peddi VR, Whiting J, Weiskittel PD, Alexander JW, First MR. Characteristics of long-term renal transplant survivors. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1998; 32: 101–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Massy ZA, Guijarro C, Wiederkehr MR, Ma JZ, Kasiske BL. Chronic renal allograft rejection: immunologic and nonimmunologic risk factors. Kidney Int. 1996; 49: 518–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Matas AJ. Acute rejection is a major risk factor for chronic rejection. Transplant. Proc. 1998; 30: 766–1768.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kasiske BL, Kalil RSN, Lee HS, Rao KV. Histopathologic findings associated with a chronic, progressive decline in renal allograft function. Kidney Int. 1991; 40: 514–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993; 329: 1456–1462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Klahr S. Levey AS, Beck GJ et al. The effects of dietary protein restriction and blood-pressure control in the progression of chronic renal disease. N.Engl. Med. 1994; 330: 877–884.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasiske BL, Massy ZA, Guijarro C, Ma JZ. Chronic renal allograft rejection and clinical trial design. Kidney Int. 1995; 48 (Suppl 52): S116–S119.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Isoniemi H, Nurminen M, Tikkanen M et al. Risk factors predicting chronic rejection of renal allograft. Transplantation. 1994; 57: 68–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dimény E, Wahlberg J, Larsson E, Fellström B. Can histopathological findings in early renal allograft biopsies identify patients at risk for chronic vascular rejection? Clin. Transplant. 1995; 9: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Serön D, Moreso F, Boyer J et al. Early protocol renal allograft biopsies and graft outcome. Kidney Int. 1997; 51: 310–316.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fioretto P, Steffes MW, Mihatsch MJ, Strom EH, Sutherland DER, Mauer M. Cyclosporine associated lesions in native kidneys of diabetic pancreas transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 1995; 48: 489–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebbutt AF Frith L. Practical issues in equivalence trials. Stat. Med. 1998; 17: 1691–1701.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones B, Jarvis P, Lewis JA, Ebbutt AE Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. BMJ. 1996; 313: 36–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 334: 835–840.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shield CF III, McGrath MM, Goss TE Assessment of health-related quality of life in kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus (FK506)-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. Transplantation. 1997; 64: 1738–1743.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hunsicker LG, Bennett LE. Design of trials of methods to reduce late renal allograft loss: the price of success. Kidney Int. Suppl. 1995; 52: S120–S123.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

P. Cochat J. Traeger C. Merieux M. Derchavane

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kasiske, B.L. (1999). Surrogate end-points for clinical trials in renal transplantation. In: Cochat, P., Traeger, J., Merieux, C., Derchavane, M. (eds) Immunosuppression under Trial. Transplantation and Clinical Immunology, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4643-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4643-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5960-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4643-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics