Abstract
Critical Applied Linguistics (CALx) is not, as yet, a term that is widely used. Nevertheless, it appears to be a useful umbrella under which a number of emerging critical approaches to language and education can be described. Part of the difficulty in defining CALx lies in the difficulties in determining both what it is to be critical and what is meant by Applied Linguistics. The term critical has a number of senses, from the popular meaning of stating negative opinions (as in ‘don’t be so critical’), through the sense of the general practice of commentary (as in literary criticism), to a more psychological version of ways of thinking (as in critical thinking). The sense of critical being used here, however, derives from a line of cultural and political work (‘Critical Theory’), which takes as its basic goal the need for critical analysis of the social, cultural, economic and political ways in which people are inequitably positioned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Auerbach, E.: 1995, ‘The politics of the ESL classroom: Issues of power in pedagogical choices’, In J. Tollefson (ed.), Power and Inequality in Language Education, Cambridge University Press, New York, 9–33.
Benesch, S.: 1993, ‘ESL, ideology, and the politics of pragmatism, TESOL Quarterly 27, 705–717.
Bourne, J.: 1988, ‘ “Natural Acquisition” and a “Masked Pedagogy” ’, Applied Linguistics 9, 83–99.
Canagarajah, A.S.: 1993, ‘Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL’, TESOL Quarterly 27, 601–626.
Canagarajah, A.S.: 1996, ‘From critical research practice to critical research reporting’, TESOL Quarterly 30, 321–331.
Candlin, C: 1990, ‘What happens when applied linguistics goes critical?’, in M.A.K. Halliday, J. Gibbons & H. Nicholas (eds.), Learning, Keeping and Using Language, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Clark, R.: 1992, ‘Principles and practice of CLA in the classroom’, In N. Fairclough (ed.), Critical Language Awareness, Longman, London, 117–140.
Dendrinos, B.: 1992, The EEL Textbook and Ideology, N.C. Grivas, Athens.
Fairclough, N.: 1989, Language and Power, Longman, London.
Fairclough, N.: 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis, Longman, London.
Graman, T: 1988, ‘Education for humanization: Applying Paulo Freire’s pedagogy to learning a second language’, Harvard Educational Review 58, 433–448.
Kress, G.: 1990, ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in W. Grabe (ed.), Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 11, 84–99.
Nelson, C.: 1993, ‘Heterosexism in ESL: Examining our attitudes’,TESOL Quarterly 27, 143–150.
Oda, M.: 1995, ‘Native and nonnative EEL teachers: Building the profession together’, paper presented at The Twenty-Ninth Annual TESOL Convention, Long Beach, California, March 28-April 1, 1995.
Peirce, B.N.: 1995, ‘Social identity, investment, and language learning’, TESOL Quarterly 29,9–31.
Pennycook, A.: 1990, ‘Towards a critical applied linguistics for the 1990s’, Issues in Applied Linguistics 1, 8–28.
Pennycook, A.: 1994a, The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language, Longman, London.
Pennycook, A.: 1994b, ‘Incommensurable discourses?’, Applied Linguistics 15, 115–138.
Phillipson, R.: 1992, Linguistic Imperialism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Phillipson, R. & Skutnabb-Kangas T: 1995, ‘Linguistic rights and wrongs’, Applied Linguistics 16,483–504.
Rampton, B.: 1995, ‘Politics and change in research in applied linguistics’, Applied Linguistics 16, 233–256.
Richards, J., Piatt, J. & Weber, H.: 1985, Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics,Longman, London.
Sanguinetti, J.: 1992/3, ‘Women, “empowerment” and ESL: An exploration of critical and feminist pedagogies’, Prospect 8 (1&2), 9–37.
Schenke, A.: 1991, ‘The “will to reciprocity” and the work of memory: Fictioning speaking out of silence in E.S.L. and feminist pedagogy’, Resources for Feminist Research 20, 47–55.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Cummins, J.: (eds.) 1988, Minority Education: From Shame to Struggle, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.
Sunderland, J. (ed.): 1994, Exploring Gender: Questions and Implications for English Language Education, Prentice Hall, New York.
Tollefson, J.: 1991, Planning Language, Planning Inequality, Longman, London.
van Dijk, T.: 1993 ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’, Discourse and Society 4, 249–283.
Walsh, C.: 1991, Pedagogy and the Struggle for Voice: Issues of Language, Power, and Schooling for Puerto Ricans, OISE Press, Toronto.
Wodak, R. (ed.): 1989, Language, Power, and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Wodak, R.: 1995, ‘Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis’, in J. Verschueren, J-O Östman & J. Blommart (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R.: 1996, Disorders of Discourse, London: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pennycook, A. (1997). Critical Applied Linguistics and Education. In: Wodak, R., Corson, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4538-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4538-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4928-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4538-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive