Abstract
The evolution of two basic premises in 20th-century structural linguistics created the conditions for the emergence of variationist sociolinguistics as an interdisciplinary field. These premises are cultural relativism and orderly linguistic heterogeneity. Cultural relativism is an anthropological tradition inherited by linguistics, according to which no culture or language of a speech community is classified as inferior or underdeveloped irrespective of the level of Western technology that the speech community has achieved. Under the influence of the principle of cultural relativism, linguists posited the ‘functional equivalence and essential equality of all languages, and rejected mistaken evolutionary stereotypes’ (Hymes, 1974, p. 70). At a first stage the relativistic premise applied to comparisons across languages but when the orderly heterogeneity premise was postulated by variationist sociolinguists in the late 60’s, it evolved to comparisons across different varieties or styles of a same language. No variety within a language would be considered inherently superior to the others as concerns its structure even though functional distinctions among them would be acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baratz, J.C. & Shuy, R.W. (eds.): 1969, Teaching Black Children to Read, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
Bernstein. B.B.: 1971, Class, Codes and Control (vol. 1), Paladin, London.
Bortoni-Ricardo, S.: 1996, ‘Codeswitching in a bidialectal school’, in J. Arnold et al. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Variation, Data, Theory, and Analysis, Selected Papers from NWAVE 23 at Stanford, CSLI Publication, Stanford, 377–386.
Bortoni-Ricardo, S.: 1985, The Urbanization of Rural Dialect Speakers: A Sociolinguistic Study in Brazil, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bull, T.: 1982, ‘Mother tongue teaching and learning: Teaching beginners to read and write in the vernacular’, mimeo.
Cheshire, J., Edwards, V., Münstrermann, H. & Weltens B.: 1989, ‘Dialect and education in Europe: A general perspective’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 10, 1–10.
Edwards, V.: 1989, ‘Dialect and education in Europe: A postscript’, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 10, 317–323.
Erickson, F. & Shultz, J.: 1977, ‘When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence’, The Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development 1(2), 5–10.
Fasold, R.W.: 1990, Sociolinguistic s of Language, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Fasold, R.W.: 1969, ‘Orthography in reading material’, in J.C. Baratz & R.W. Shuy (eds.), 68–91.
Freitas, V.L.: 1996, ‘A Variação Estilística de Alunos de 4a Série em Ambiente de Contato Dialetal’, M. A. unpublished thesis, University of Brasília.
Hymes, D.: 1974, Foundations of Sociolinguistics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Labov, W.: 1987, ‘Are black and white vernaculars diverging?’, American Speech 62(1), 5–12.
Labov, W.: 1972, Language in the Inner City, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Labov, W: 1969, ‘The logic of nonstandard English’, Georgetown Monograph on Language and Linguistics, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC (Reprinted in Labov, 1972).
Labov, W. & Harris, W.A.: 1986, ‘De facto segregation of black and white vernaculars’, in Sankoff, D. (ed.), Diversity and Diachrony, John Benjamins B.V, Amsterdam, 1–24.
Mollica, M.C.: 1996, ‘Sociolingüística e Ensino de Língua’, Paper read at the SBPC Annual Conference.
Mougeon, R. & Beniak, E.: 1991, Linguistic Consequences of Language Contact and Restriction, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Naro, A.J.: 1981, ‘The social and structural dimension of a syntactic change’, Language 57(1), 63–98.
Pintsuk, S.: 1988, VARBRUL programs, unpublished manuscript.
Sankoff, D.: 1988, ‘Variable rules’, in U. Ammon, N. Dittmar & J. Klauss (eds.) Sociolinguistics, Academic Press, New York, 119–126.
Shuy, R.W.: 1969, ‘A linguistic background for developing beginning reading materials for black children’, in Baratz & Shuy (eds.), 117–137.
Silva, G.M. de O. & Paiva, M.: 1996, ‘Visão de Conjunto das Variáveis Sociais’, in Silva & Scherre (eds.), 335–378.
Silva, G.M. de O. & Scherre, M.M. (eds.): 1996, Padrões Lingüísticos, Tempo Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro.
Sinclair, J. McH. & Coulthard, M.: 1975, Towards an Analysis of Discourse, Oxford University Press, London.
Stewart, WA.: 1969, ‘On the use of negro dialect in the teaching of reading’ in Baratz & Shuy (eds.), 156–219.
Stubbs, M: 1980, Language and literacy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Toohey, K.: 1986, ‘Minority educational failure: Is dialect a factor?’ Curriculum Inquiry 16(2), 128–145.
Wolfram, W. & Christian, D.: 1989, Dialects and Education: Issues and Answers, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Wolfson, N.: 1989, Perspectives — Sociolinguistics and TESOL, Newbury House Publishers, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bortoni-Ricardo, S.M. (1997). Variationist Sociolinguistics. In: Hornberger, N.H., Corson, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4535-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4935-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4535-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive