Skip to main content

Teaching, Learning and Assessing Argument

  • Chapter
  • 452 Accesses

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((LANG,volume 6))

Abstract

In broad terms, studies in argument can be ranged on a continuum between formal ‘internal’ notions of argument (e.g. ‘evidence supporting a conclusion’), to argument as action aimed at belief and behaviour within communicative situations. A number of divisions can be discerned in these studies. The first stems from early Greek thought and results in, on the one hand, the philosophical tradition in which language is used transparently in the pursuit of truth and, on the other, a rhetorical tradition concerned with the style and arrangement of language for the production of effects. The second is roughly a division between ‘nature and nurture’: the nature view, in various forms generally held by psychologists, is that the ability to argue is acquired developmentally; whilst the nurturers (generally educationalists) are concerned with the way argument may be developed through teaching and learning strategies (see the review by Costello).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, R., (ed.): 1989, Narrative and Argument, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R.: 1995, Teaching and Learning Argument, Cassell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., Britton, J. & Rosen, H.: 1969, Language, the Learner and the School, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrill, D.: 1992 ‘Issues of audience: Egocentrism revisited’, in Andrews, R. (ed.), Rebirth of Rhetoric, Routledge, London, 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassart, D.G.: 1989, ‘La gestion des contre-arguments dans le texte argumentatif ecrit chez les eleves de 8 a 12 ans et des adultes competents’, European Journal of the Psychology of Education 1, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin., McLeod, A. & Rosen, H.: 1975, The Development of Writing Abilities (11-18), Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Fairclough, N., Ivanic, R. & Martin-Jones, M.: 1991‘Critical language awareness. Part 2: Towards critical alternatives’, Language and Education 5, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coirier, P.: 1996‘Composing argumentative texts: cognitive and/or textual complexity’, in G. Rijlaarsdam, A. van den Berg & M. Couzijn (eds.), Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coirier, P. & Golder, C.: 1993, ‘Writing argumentative text: A developmental study of the acquisition of supporting structures’, European Journal of Psychology ofEducation 2, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, P.J. & Mitchell, S. (eds.): 1995, Competing and Consensual Voices: The Theory and Practice of Argument, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, P.J.: 1997, Liberating Children’s Minds; Education, Citizenship and Critical Thinking, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. & Stratta, L.: 1986‘Argument and the teaching of English: A critical analysis’, in A. Wilkinson (ed.), The Writing of Writing, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolz, J., Pasquier, A. & Bronckart, J.P.: 1993, ‘L’aquisition des discours: Emergence d’une compétence ou apprentissage de capacités langagieres?’, Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolz, J.: 1996, ‘Learning argumentative capacities: A study of the effects of a systematic and intensive teaching of argumentative discourse on 11-12 year-old children’, Argumentation 10(2), 226–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A.: 1988, The Logic of Real Arguments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L., Stein, V., Ackerman, J., Kantz, M.J., McCormick, K. & Peck, W.C.: 1990, Reading to Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, A. & Pringle, I.: 1985, A Comparative Study of Writing Abilities in Two Modes at the Grade 5, 8 and 12 Levels, Ministry of Education, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler, C.: 1994, Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing, and Knowing in Academic Philosophy, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, T.P., White, J., Brooks, G., MacLure, M. & Kispel, A.: 1988, Language Performance in Schools: A Review of APU Language Monitoring 1979–83, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S.: 1995‘Making sense of my own ideas: The problems of authorship in a beginning writing classroom’, Written Communication 12(2), 186–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, P. & Watkins, M.: 1994, Context/Text/Grammar, Text Productions, Broadway NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S.: 1994, Teaching and Learning A rgument in Sixth Forms and Higher Education: Final Report, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, J.: 1968, Teaching the Universe of Discourse, Houghton Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, J.: 1992, ‘The language of argument in the writing of young children’, Looking into Language: Classroom Approaches to Knowledge About Language, R. Bain, B. Fitzgerald & M. Taylor, Hodder & Stoughton, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: 1969, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver (trans. from French, 1958), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B.: 1984, Literacy in Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J.F. & Means M.L.: 1991, ‘Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation’, Learning and Instruction 1, 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, S.: 1993, ‘Cultural differences and framing: American and Japanese group discussions’, in D. Tannen (ed.), Framing in Discourse, Oxford University Press, New York, 176–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A.: 1990, ‘Argument as a primary act of mind’, English in Education 24(1), 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, P.: 1993, ‘What are essays for?’, English in Education 27(2), 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, S. (1997). Teaching, Learning and Assessing Argument. In: Van Lier, L., Corson, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4533-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4533-6_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4933-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4533-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics