Advertisement

Compressible Large Eddy Simulation Using Unstructured Grid: Supersonic Boundary Layer

  • Gerald Urbin
  • Doyle Knight
Part of the Fluid Mechanics and its Applications book series (FMIA, volume 54)

Abstract

A Mach 3 adiabatic turbulent boundary layer is studied using Large Eddy Simulation (LES). The filtered compressible Navier-Stokes equations are solved on a three-dimensional unstructured grid of tetrahedral cells. A compressible extension of the method of Lund is developed to generate the inflow conditions. Different tests on subgrid scale model and grid refinements are studied. The friction velocity predicted is accurate within a few percent; profiles of Reynolds shear and normal stresses are in good agreement with experimental data as well. The objective of this preliminary study is to assess the capability of the unstructured compressible LES method.

Keywords

Large Eddy Simulation Direct Numerical Simulation Turbulent Boundary Layer Friction Velocity Unstructured Grid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams N.A. Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Supersonic Boundary Layer Flow. Advances in DNS/LES, Proceedings of the First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Greyden Press Columbus, pp 29–40, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. E. Arad and M. Wolfshtein. Analysis of Equilibrium Adverse Pressure Gradient Boundary Layer Using Large Eddy Simulation. AIAA Paper 99-0420, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. J. Boris, F. Grinstein, E. Oran, and R. Kolbe. New Insights into Large Eddy Simulation. Fluid Dynamics Research, 10:199–228, 1992.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Ducros, P. Comte, and M. Lesieur. Large Eddy Simulation of Transition to Turbulence in a Boundary Layer Developing Spatially over a Flat Plate. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 326:1–36, 1996.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. N. El-Hady, T. Zang, and U. Piomelli. Applications of the Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Model to Axisymmetric Transitional Boundary Layer at High Speed. Physics of Fluids, 6:1299–1309, 1994.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Fasel and U. Konzelmann. Non-Parallel Stability of a Flat-Plate Boundary Layer Using the Complete Navier-Stokes Equations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 221:311–347, 1990.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. H. Fernholz and P. Finley. A Critical Commentary on Mean Flow Data for Two-dimensional Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers. AGARD Report. 253:59–63, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. J. Gottlieb and C. Groth. Assessment of Riemann Solvers for Unsteady One-Dimensional Inviscid Flows of Perfect Gases. Journal of Computational Physics, 78:437–458, 1988.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Guo, N. Adams, and L. Kleisler. Modeling of Non-Parallel Effects in Temporal Direct Numerical Simulation of Compressible Boundary Layer. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 7:141–157, 1995.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Johnson and W. Rose. Laser Velocimeter and Hot Wire Anemometer Comparison in a Supersonic Boundary Layer. AIAA Journal, 13:512–515, 1975.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Joslin, C. Street, and C. Chang. Spatial Direct Numerical Simulation of Boundary Layer Transition Mechanism: Validation of PSE Theory. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 4:271–288, 1993.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. L. Kleiser and T. Zang. Numerical Simulation of Transition in Wall-Bounded Shear Flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 23:495–537, 1991.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Knight. A Fully Implicit Navier-Stokes Algorithm Using an Unstructured Grid and Flux Difference Splitting. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 16:101–128. 1994.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Knight and G. Degrez. Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions in High Mach Number Flows — A Critical Survey of Current CFD Prediction Capabilities. AGARD AR-319, Volume 2, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. D. Knight, G. Zhou, N. Okong’o, and V. Shukla. Compressible Large Eddy Simulation Using Unstructured Grids. AIAA Paper 98-0535, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. W. Konrad. A Three Dimensional Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layer Generated by an Isentropic Compression. Ph.D Thesis, Princeton University NJ. 1993.Google Scholar
  17. W. Konrad and A. Smits. Turbulence Measurements in a Three-Dimensional Boundary Layer in Supersonic Flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 372:1–23, 1998.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. H. Le, P. Moin, and J. Kim. Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow over a Backward Facing Step. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 330:349–349, 1997.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Lee, S. Lele, and P. Moin. Interaction of Isotropic Turbulence with Shock Waves: Effect of Shock Strength. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 300:383–407, 1997.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. T. Lund, X. Wu, and K. Squires. Generation of Turbulent Inflow Data for Spatially-Developing Boundary Layer Simulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 140(2):233–258, 1998.MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Martin, U. Piomelli and G. Candler. A Priori Tests of SGS Models in Compressible Turbulence. 3rd ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, July 18–23, 1999, San Francisco USA.Google Scholar
  22. K. Muck, E. Spina, and A. Smits. Compilation of Turbulence Data for an 8 degree Compression Corner at Mach 2.9. Report MAE-1642, April 1984.Google Scholar
  23. N. Okong’o and D. Knight. Compressible Large Eddy Simulation Using Unstructured Grids: Channel and Boundary Layer Flows. AIAA Paper 98-3315. 1998.Google Scholar
  24. C. F. Ollivier-Gooch. High Order ENO Schemes for Unstructured Meshes Based on Least Squares Reconstruction. AIAA Paper No. 97-0540, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. M. Rai and P. Moin. Direct Numerical Simulation of Transition and Turbulence in Spatially Evolving Boundary Layer. Journal of Computational Physics, 109:162–192, 1993.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Smits and J.-P. Dussauge. Turbulent Shear Layers in Supersonic Flow. American Institute of Physics, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
  27. P. Spalart. Direct Simulation of a Turbulent Boundary Layer up to R θ = 1410. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 187:61–98, 1988.ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. P. Spalart and K. Yang. Numerical Study of Ribbon-Induced Transition in Blasius Flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 178:345–365, 1987.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. G. Urbin, C. Brun, and O. Metais. Large Eddy Simulation of Three-Dimensional Spatially Evolving Round Jets. In 11th Turbulent Shear Flows Conference, Grenoble, France, September 1997.Google Scholar
  30. G. Urbin, D. Knight, A. Zheltovodov. Compressible Large Eddy Simulation using Unstructured Grid: Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layer and Compression Corner. AIAA Paper 99-0427, 1999.Google Scholar
  31. A. Walz. Boundary Layers of Flow and Temperature. MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  32. A.A. Zheltovodov, V.N. Yakovlev. Stages of Development, Gas Dynamic Structure and Turbulence Characteristics of Turbulent Compressible Separated Flows in the Vicinity of 2-D Obstacles. Preprint No 27-86, Inst. of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, USSR Acad. of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 1986, 55 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Urbin
    • 1
  • Doyle Knight
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations