Skip to main content

Solar Wind Correlations: Using a Solar Wind Monitor Successfully

  • Chapter
Interball in the ISTP Program

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((ASIC,volume 537))

  • 158 Accesses

Abstract

Solar wind plasma correlations between data from three spacecraft — IMP 8, INTERBALL-1, and WIND — are analyzed for periods near the most recent solar minimum. There are two primary foci of this study: 1) to understand the physics underlying good and poor correlation periods, and 2) to investigate and quantify the degree to which distant solar wind plasma measurements (such as those from near Earth’s L1 point) represent the solar wind affecting the magnetosheath and magnetosphere.

The correlations are examined as a function of the positional separations (in GSE) of the spacecraft, the average flux, speed, and density of the solar wind, the standard deviations of those parameters, and the lags that give the maximum correlation. The character of the correlation behavior (i.e., what percentage of the time good or poor correlations are observed) appears to be dependent on X-separation past some distance (~ 220 R E )which may be dependent on solar cycle timing. There appear to be no strong dependencies on Y-separation or on speed, but some dependence on the flux and density magnitudes and the dependence on their standard deviations is especially strong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paularena, K.I., Zastenker, G.N., Lazarus, A.J. and Dalin, P.A. (1998) Solar wind plasma correlations between IMP 8, INTERBALL-1 and WIND, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,601–14,617.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Richardson, J.D., Dashevskiy, F. and Paularena, K.I. (1998) Solar wind plasma correlations between L1 and Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,619–14,629.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zastenker, G.N., Dalin, P.A., Lazarus, A.J. and Paularena, K.I. (1998) Comparison of solar wind parameters measured simultaneously by several spacecraft, Cosmic Research, 36, 214–225. Also Kosmich. Issled. On Russian), 36, 228–240.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson, J.D. and Paularena, K.I. (1998) The orientation of plasma structure in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2097–2100.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collier, M.R., Slavin, J.A., Lepping, R.P., Szabo, A., and Ogilvie, K. (1998) Timing accuracy for the simple planar propagation of magnetic field structures in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2509–2512.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. King, J.H. (1982) Availability of IMP-7 and IMP-8 data for the IMS period, in C.T. Russell and D.J. Southwood (eds.) The IMS Source Book, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., pp. 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, S C and Nishida, A. (1973) Spatial structure of transverse oscillations in the interplanetary magnetic field Astrophys. Sp. Sci. 23, 301–314 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, C.T., Siscoe, G.L. and Smith, E.J. (1980)Comparison of ISEE-1 and -3 interplanetary magnetic field observations, Geophys. Res. Lett. 7, 381–384.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Crooker, N.U., Siscoe, G.L., Russell, C.T., and Smith, E.J. (1982) Factors controlling degree of correlation between ISEE 1 and ISEE 3 interplanetary magnetic field measurements, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 2224–2230.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paularena, K.I. and Lazarus, A.J. (1994) Comment on “Intercalibration of solar wind instruments during the international magnetospheric study” by S.M. Petrinec and C.T. Russell, J. Geophys. Res. 99 14,777–14,778.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellomo, A. and Mavretic, A. (1978) Description of the MIT plasma experiment on IMP 7/8, Rep. CSR TR-78–2, 51 pp., Cent. for Space Res., Mass. Inst. of Technol., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ogilvie, K.W., et al., (1995) SWE, a comprehensive plasma instrument for the Wind spacecraft, Space Sei. Rev. 71, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Šafránková, J., et al. (1997) Small scale observations of magnetopause motion: Preliminary results of the INTERBALL project, Ann. Geophys. 15, 562–569.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paularena, K.I., Richardson, J.D., Zastenker, G.N., Dalin, P.A. (1999). Solar Wind Correlations: Using a Solar Wind Monitor Successfully. In: Sibeck, D.G., Kudela, K. (eds) Interball in the ISTP Program. NATO Science Series, vol 537. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4487-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4487-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5864-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4487-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics