Skip to main content

How Risky is Direct Democracy for Basic Science?

  • Chapter
RNA Biochemistry and Biotechnology

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((ASHT,volume 70))

  • 514 Accesses

Abstract

A threatful national referendum which aimed at prohibiting gene technology in Switzerland to a large extend by prohibiting transgenic animals, deliberate release of genetic modified organisms, the patenting of animals and plants as well as their parts and products and by demanding a general reversal of burden of proof in research, has initiated the discussion about the necessity to rethink public communication about new technologies and risk communication both on the side of science as on the side of industry. The paper proposes the installation of three new institutions: first of all the implementation of a Competence Center for Biosafety which fulfills a new form of risk communication as well as the cantonal execution of federal ordinances, second a new institution for establishing strong links between Universities and High Schools to improve information transfer of basic science to the public and third the installation of an information system on the internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sybille Hardmeier, Daniel Scheiwiller: Analyse der eidgenössischen Abstimmung vom 7. Juni 1998

    Google Scholar 

  2. Making that link; Biotechnology and biological science research council (UK) 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andreas Thomann; Was bewegt die Schweiz? CS Bulletin 1/1998

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manuel Eisner, Gentechnologie und gesellschaftliche Moral, Bio World 1/98

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mani, P. (1999). How Risky is Direct Democracy for Basic Science?. In: Barciszewski, J., Clark, B.F.C. (eds) RNA Biochemistry and Biotechnology. NATO Science Series, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4485-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4485-8_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5862-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4485-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics