Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSPS,volume 20))

Abstract

According to OECD data, all transitional economies have experienced cuts in R&D expenditures since the beginning of reforms, in absolute terms and in relation to GDP (Radosevic and Auriol, 1999; European Commission, 1994). The European economies in transition were, indeed, the only part of the world that experienced a substantial decline in R&D activity in the first half of 1990s. The OECD data show that the largest fall was recorded for industrial R&D. Since there is no breakdown of industry R&D data between in-house and external R&D, little is known about R&D behaviour at the firm level, particularly about the main factors influencing that behaviour. Where individual country data on R&D behaviour at the firm level have been available, early attempts to identify the determinants of levels of R&D did not produce clear-cut results. For example, Inzelt (1996) reports that in an analysis of patterns of interaction between R&D intensity and other firm characteristics (including size, ownership, and growth rates) based on a sample of 46 Hungarian firms, not even a moderate degree of correlation was found between the examined variables. The objective of this paper is to extend our knowledge of R&D behaviour of firms in transitional economies by finding out what the determinants of that behaviour really are.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, J.H. and Nelson, F.D. (1984), Linear probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-045, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, W.L. and Scott, J.T. (1987), Market Structure and Technological Change, London: Hanvood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, H. and Willmore, L. (1991), ‘Technological Imports and Technological Effort: an Analysis of their Determinants in Brazilian Firms’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, W., van Reenen, J. and Wolfe, T. (1995), ‘Enterprise Restructuring in Early Transition: the Case Study Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe’, Economics of Transition, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 427–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and Levin, R.C. (1989), ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in Schmalensee and Willig (eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier Science Publishers, Vol. II, pp. 1060–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deolalikar, A.B. and Sundaram, A.K. (1989), ‘Technology Choice, Adaptation and Diffusion in Private-and State-Owned Enterprises in India’, in James, J. (ed.), The Technological Behaviour of Public Enterprises in Developing Countries, London: Routledge, pp. 73–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988), Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, pp. 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1994), The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1994, Report EUR 15897 EN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, L. and Sosin, K. (1986), ‘Evaluating Differences in Technological Activity between Transnational and Domestic Firms in Latin America’, The Journal of Development Studies Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzelt, A. (1996), ‘Institutional Support for Technological Improvement: the Case of Hungary’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 51, pp. 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katrak, H. (1985), ‘Imported Technology, Enterprise Size and R&D in a Newly Industrializing Country: the Indian Experience’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katrak, H. (1990), ‘Imports of Technology and the Technological Effort of Indian Enterprises’, World Development, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katrak, H. (1991), ‘In-House Technological Effort, Imports of Technology and Enterprise Characteristics in a Newly Industrializing Country: the Indian Experience’, Journal of International Development, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. (1986), ‘The Soft Budget Constraint’, Kyklos, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. and Saqib, M. (1994), Firm Size, Opportunities for Adaptation, and In-House R&D Activity in Developing Countries: the Case of Indian Manufacturing, UNU/INTECH Working Paper No. 13, Maastricht: UNU/INTECH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1990), Building Industrial Competitiveness in Developing Countries, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D. and Sachs, J. (1990), ‘Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: the Case of Poland’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, I, pp. 75–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S. (1983), Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, S. (1995), ‘Applied Logistic Regression Analysis’, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-106, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. and Wang, Y. (1993), When Privatization Should be Delayed: the Effect of Communist Legacies on Organizational and Institutional Reforms, Working Paper No. 93-1, College Park, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (1977), The Moon and the Ghetto, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1992), Technology and Economy: the Key Relationships, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984), ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy, Vol. 13, pp. 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S. and Auriol, L. (1999), ‘Patterns of Restructuring in Research, Development and Innovation Activities in Central and Eastern European Countries: an Analysis Based on S&T Indicators’, Research Policy 28, pp. 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddharthan, N.S. and Agarwal, R.N. (1991), Determinants of R&D Decisions: a Cross-Section Study of Indian Private Corporate Firms, mimeo, Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urem, B. (1997), ‘Enterprise Strategies in Transition: a Case Study of Czech and Hungarian Firms’, in Enterprise in Transition, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on ‘Enterprise in Transition’, Split-Brela, 22-24 May 1997, Split: Faculty of Economics and Vienna: DAAAM International, pp. 349-353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urem, B. (1999). R&D Behaviour of Firms in Transition Economies: An Analysis of the Key Determinants. In: Dyker, D.A., Radosevic, S. (eds) Innovation and Structural Change in Post-Socialist Countries: A Quantitative Approach. NATO ASI Series, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4463-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4463-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5913-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4463-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics