Advertisement

Porphyra cultivation in Alaska: conchocelis growth of three indigenous species

  • Michael S. Stekoll
  • Rulong Lin
  • Sandra C. Lindstrom
Conference paper
  • 421 Downloads
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 137)

Abstract

Experiments were performed to determine the range and optima of environmental conditions under which indigenous species of Alaskan Porphyra can grow. Growth of the conchocelis phase of Porphyra abbottae, P. torta and P. pseudolinearis was measured, when cultured in enriched media, under long days (16 h light) and varying conditions of irradiance (20, 40, 80 and 160 μmol photons m−2 s−1), temperature (7, 11, 15 and 19 °C) and salinity (5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 ‱). Optimal growth (7.6% increase in volume day−1) of P abbottae occurred at 11 °C, 80 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and 30 ‱. Porphyra torta grew best (6.5% day−1) at 15 °C, 80 /xmol photons m−2 s−1 and 30 ‱. Porphyra pseudolinearis generally had higher growth rates than the other two species with optimal growth (8.8% day−1) occurring at 7 °C, 160 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and 30 ‱. For all three species salinity between 20 and 40 ‱ had little effect on growth, but there was virtually no growth at salinity of 10 ‱ and below. Irradiances between 20 and 160 μmol photons m−2 s−1 generally had little effect on growth rates. However, growth of P. abbottae increased with irradiance at 7 °C but was inhibited at irradiances over 40 μmol photons m−2 s−1 at 15 °C and higher. Porphyra torta also showed growth inhibition at 15 °C and higher irradiances. Porphyra pseudolinearis appeared to be the most robust species with respect to tolerance to extremes of salinity and irradiance.

Key words

Porphyra conchocelis aquaculture growth Alaska nori 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergdahl, J. C., 1990. Nori (Porphyra C. Ag.: Rhodophyta) maricul-ture research and technology transfer along the northeast Pacific coast. In Akatsuka, I. (ed.), Introduction to Applied Phycology. SPD Academic Publishing, The Hague: 519–551.Google Scholar
  2. DeBoer, J. A., H. J. Guigli, T. L. Israel & C. F. D’Elia, 1978. Nutritional studies of two red algae. I. Growth rate as a function of nitrogen source and concentration. J. Phycol. 14: 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hannach, G. & J. R. Waaland, 1989. Growth and morphology of young gametophytes of Porphyra abbottae (Rhodophyta): effects of environmental factors in culture. J. Phycol. 25: 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lindstrom, S. C. & K. M. Cole, 1992. A revision of the species of Porphyra (Rhodophyta: Bangiales) occurring in British Columbia and adjacent waters. Can. J. Bot. 70: 2066–2075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lindstrom, S. C., N. I. Calvin & R. J. Ellis, 1986. Benthic marine algae of the Juneau, Alaska area. Contr. Nat. Sci. (B.C. Prov. Mus.), No. 6: 10 pp.Google Scholar
  6. McLachlan, J., 1973. Growth media-marine. In Stein, J. (ed.), Handbook of Phycological Methods: Culture Methods and Growth Measurements. Cambridge University Press, London: 25–51.Google Scholar
  7. Merrill, J. E., 1993. Development of nori markets in the western world. J. appl. Phycol. 5: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mumford, T. F. Jr., 1990. Nori cultivation in North America: growth of the industry. Hydrobiologia 204/205: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mumford, T. F. Jr. & A. Miura, 1988. Porphyra as food: cultivation and economics. In Lembi, C. A. & J. R. Waaland (eds), Algae and Human Affairs. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York: 87–117.Google Scholar
  10. Roberts, W. A. Jr., 1993. An assessment of markets for Porphyra products. Report to Sitka Tribe of Alaska, University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, 39 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Scagel, R. F., P. W. Gabrielson, D. J. Garbary, L. Golden, M. W. Hawkes, S. C. Lindstrom, J. C. Oliveira & T. B. Widdowson, 1989 (reprinted 1993). A synopsis of the benthic marine algae of British Columbia, Southeast Alaska, Washington and Oregon. Phycological Contribution No. 3, Univ. of British Columbia, 532 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Stekoll, M. S., 1998. The seaweed resources of Alaska. In Ohno, M., & A. T. Critchley (eds), Seaweed Resources of the World. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo: 258–265.Google Scholar
  13. Waaland, J. R., L. G. Dickson & E. C. S. Duffield, 1990. Conchospore production and seasonal occurrence of some Porphyra species (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in Washington State. Hydrobiologia 204/205: 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Waaland, J. R., L. G. Dickson, E. C. S. Duffield & G. M. Burzycki, 1986. Research on Porphyra aquaculture. In Barclay W. R., & R. P. Mcintosh (eds), Algal Biomass Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Nova Hedwigia 83: 124–131.Google Scholar
  15. Waaland, J. R., L. G. Dickson, E. C. S. Duffield & J. E. Carrier, 1987. Conchocelis growth and photoperiodic control of conchospore release in Porphyra torta (Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 23: 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Stekoll
    • 1
  • Rulong Lin
    • 1
  • Sandra C. Lindstrom
    • 2
  1. 1.Juneau Center, School of Fisheries and Ocean ScienceUniversity of AlaskaJuneauAKUSA
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations