Abstract
Distributed organizations increasingly rely on new video-supported communication technologies that may be subject to transmission delays. These delays systematically misalign the feedback one side receives from the other. Through microanalysis of video data from a video-supported meeting in a geographically distributed company, we examine the impact of delay in such communication systems. We specify some ways in which they may subliminally affect communication between remote parties. We illustrate typical kinds of breakdown and conclude with observations about the impact of delays on distributed interaction and the ways in which these impacts can be mediated.
Keywords
- Transmission Delay
- Remote Communication
- Computer Support Cooperative Work
- Conversational Partner
- Remote Interaction
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Button, G., and Dourish, P. (1996): “Technomethodology: Paradoxes and Possibilities,” Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 19–26.
Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V. and Henderson, A. (1996): “Your Place or Mine? Learning from Long-Term Use of Video Communication,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–62.
Dourish, P., and Bellotti, V. (1992): “Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces,” Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 107–114.
Garfinkel, H. (1967): Studies in Ethnomethodology, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Goodwin, C. (1980): “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginnings,” Sociological Inquiry, vol. 50, nos. 3–4, pp. 272–302.
Goodwin, C. (1981): Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers, New York: Academic Press.
Heath, C. and Luff, P. (1993): “Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication,” in Button, G., Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, Routledge, London, pp. 35–54.
Isaacs, E. A., Morris, T., Rodriguez, T. K., and Tang, J. C. (1995): “Comparison of Face-to-face and Distributed Presentations,” Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 354–361.
Jefferson, G. (1984): “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgment Tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mm hm,’” Papers in Linguistics, vol. 17, no. 1–4, pp. 197–216.
Jordan, B. and Fuller, N. (1975): “On the Non-Fatal Nature of Trouble: Sense-Making and Trouble-Managing in Lingua Franca Talk,” Semiotica, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–16.
Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. (1995): “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 39–103.
Kendon, A. (1967): Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction. Acta Psychologica, vol. 26, pp. 22–63.
O’Conaill, B., Whittaker, S., and Wilbur, S. (1993): “Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 8, pp. 389–428.
Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M. and Meader D. K. (1995): “What Mix of Video and Audio is Useful for Small Groups Doing Remote Real-time Design Work?” Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 362–367.
Riesz, R. R., and Klemmer, E. T. (1963): “Subjective Evaluation of Delay and Echo Suppressors in Telephone Communications,” The Bell System Technical Journal November, pp. 2919–2933.
Ruhleder, K., and Jordan, B. (1997): “Capturing Complex, Distributed Activities.” in Lee, A. S., Liebenau, J. and De Gross, J. I. Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 246–257.
Ruhleder, K., Jordan, B., and Elmes, M. (1996): “Wiring the ‘New Organization’: Integrating Collaborative Technologies and Team-Based Work,” Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, http://alexia.lis.uiuc.edu/~ruhleder/publications/96.academy.html.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974): “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turntaking for Conversation,” Language, vol. 50, pp. 696–735.
Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1977): The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.,” Language, vol. 53, pp. 361–382.
Schegloff, E. (1979a): “Identification and Recognition in Telephone Openings.” In Psathas, G., Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 23–78.
Schegloff, E. (1979b): “The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation,” in Givon, T., Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 261–288.
Schegloff, E. (1981): “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh huh’ and Other Things that Come Between Sentences,” in Tannen, D., Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, pp. 71–93.
Sellen, A. J., (1995): “Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 10, pp. 401–444.
Sellen, A. J., and Harper, R. (1997): “Video in Support of Organisational Talk,” in Finn, K., Sellen, A. and Wilbur, S., Video-Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 225–244.
Storck, J. and Sproull, L. (1995): “Through a Glass Darkly: What Do People Learn in Videoconferences?” Human-Computer Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 197–219.
Tang, J. C., and Isaacs, E. (1993): “Why do users like video?” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 163–196.
Tatar, D. G., Foster, G., and Bobrow, D. G. (1991): “Design for conversation: lessons from Cognoter,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 185–209.
Whittaker, S. (1995): “Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 501–29.
Yngve, V. (1970) On Getting a Word in Edgewise. Papers of the 6th Regional Meeting of the Linguistic Society of Chicago, pp. 564–577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruhleder, K., Jordan, B. (1999). Meaning-Making Across Remote Sites: How Delays in Transmission Affect Interaction. In: Bødker, S., Kyng, M., Schmidt, K. (eds) ECSCW ’99. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4441-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4441-4_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5948-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4441-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive