Abstract
Throughout the previous chapters we have been concerned with the acquisition of data, much of it numerical, and its subsequent manipulation to provide information in whatever form it may be required. During these manipulations the assumption has been made that the analytical result is exact. However, as is only too obvious to any analyst who carries out even duplicate analyses, any replication of an analytical measurement will, in general, give a set of results differing by measurable amounts. It is therefore essential that the results from any measurement procedure can be assessed critically to determine the extent of variation which may be expected from a particular procedure and thereby provide a basis for estimating the likely variability, or uncertainty associated with a specific set of analytical results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Davies, O.L. and Goldsmith, P.L. (1972) Statistical Methods in Research and Production, 4th edn, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Dixon, W.J. (1953) Biometrics 9 74.
Ferguson, T.S. (1961) Rev. Inst. Int. de Stat. 3, 29.
Grubbs, F.E. (1969) Technometrics 11 1.
Grubbs, F.E. and Beck, G. (1972) Technometrics 14 847.
Teitjen, J.E. and Moore, R.H. (1972) Technometrics 14 583.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loadman, M.J.R. (1998). Validity of results. In: Analysis of Rubber and Rubber-like Polymers. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4435-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4435-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5905-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4435-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive